• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围产期心理治疗的使用及联邦医疗保险覆盖前后的费用。

Perinatal Psychotherapy Use and Costs Before and After Federally Mandated Health Insurance Coverage.

机构信息

Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Department of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2426802. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26802.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26802
PMID:39120900
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11316231/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Insurance coverage affects health care access for many delivering women diagnosed with perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs). The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA; passed in 2008) and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA; passed in 2010) aimed to improve health care access.

OBJECTIVE

To assess associations between MHPAEA and ACA implementation and psychotherapy use and costs among delivering women overall and with PMADs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study conducted interrupted time series analyses of private insurance data from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2019, for delivering women aged 15 to 44 years, including those with PMADs, to assess changes in psychotherapy visits in the year before and the year after delivery. It estimated changes in any psychotherapy use and per-visit out-of-pocket costs (OOPCs) for psychotherapy associated with MHPAEA (January 2010) and ACA (January 2014) implementation. Data analyses were performed from August 2022 to May 2023.

EXPOSURES

Implementation of the MHPAEA and ACA.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Any psychotherapy use and per-visit OOPCs for psychotherapy standardized to 2019 dollars.

RESULTS

The study included 837 316 overall deliveries among 716 052 women (mean [SD] age, 31.2 [5.4] years; 7.6% Asian, 8.8% Black, 12.8% Hispanic, 64.1% White, and 6.7% unknown race and ethnicity). In the overall cohort, a nonsignificant step change was found in the delivering women who received psychotherapy after MHPAEA implementation of 0.09% (95% CI, -0.04% to 0.21%; P = .16) and a nonsignificant slope change of delivering women who received psychotherapy of 0.00% per month (95% CI, -0.02% to 0.01%; P = .69). A nonsignificant step change was found in delivering individuals who received psychotherapy after ACA implementation of 0.11% (95% CI, -0.01% to 0.22%; P = .07) and a significantly increased slope change of delivering individuals who received psychotherapy of 0.03% per month (95% CI, 0.00% to 0.05%; P = .02). Among those with PMADs, the MHPAEA was associated with an immediate increase (0.72%; 95% CI, 0.26% to 1.18%; P = .002) then sustained decrease (-0.05%; -0.09% to -0.02%; P = .001) in psychotherapy receipt; the ACA was associated with immediate (0.77%; 95% CI, 0.26% to 1.27%; P = .003) and sustained (0.07%; 95% CI, 0.02% to 0.12%; P = .005) monthly increases. In both populations, per-visit monthly psychotherapy OOPCs decreased (-$0.15; 95% CI, -$0.24 to -$0.07; P < .001 for overall and -$0.22; -$0.32 to -$0.12; P < .001 for the PMAD population) after MHPAEA passage with an immediate increase ($3.14 [95% CI, $1.56-$4.73]; P < .001 and $2.54 [95% CI, $0.54-$4.54]; P = .01) and steady monthly increase ($0.07 [95% CI, $0.02-$0.12]; P = .006 and $0.10 [95% CI, $0.03-$0.17]; P = .004) after ACA passage.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found complementary and complex associations between passage of the MHPAEA and ACA and access to psychotherapy among delivering individuals. These findings indicate the value of continuing efforts to improve access to mental health treatment for this population.

摘要

重要性

保险覆盖范围影响许多被诊断患有围产期情绪和焦虑障碍 (PMAD) 的产妇获得医疗保健的机会。心理健康平等待遇和成瘾公平法案 (MHPAEA;2008 年通过) 和患者保护与平价医疗法案 (ACA;2010 年通过) 旨在改善医疗保健的可及性。

目的

评估 MHPAEA 和 ACA 实施与接受治疗的产妇整体和患有 PMAD 的产妇接受心理治疗的使用和费用之间的关联。

设计、设置和参与者:这项横断面研究对 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间私人保险数据进行了中断时间序列分析,包括 15 至 44 岁的产妇,包括患有 PMAD 的产妇,以评估分娩前一年和分娩后一年心理治疗就诊次数的变化。它估计了与 MHPAEA(2010 年 1 月)和 ACA(2014 年 1 月)实施相关的任何心理治疗使用和每次就诊的自付费用 (OOPC) 的变化。数据分析于 2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 5 月进行。

暴露情况

MHPAEA 和 ACA 的实施。

主要结果和措施

标准化为 2019 美元的任何心理治疗使用和每次就诊的 OOPC。

结果

该研究包括 716052 名女性的 837316 次分娩(平均[SD]年龄,31.2[5.4]岁;7.6%为亚洲人,8.8%为黑人,12.8%为西班牙裔,64.1%为白人,6.7%为未知种族和民族)。在总体队列中,MHPAEA 实施后接受心理治疗的产妇就诊人数出现了一个非显著的阶跃变化,增加了 0.09%(95%CI,-0.04%至 0.21%;P=0.16),每月接受心理治疗的产妇就诊人数的斜率变化也出现了一个非显著的阶跃变化,增加了 0.00%(95%CI,-0.02%至 0.01%;P=0.69)。ACA 实施后接受心理治疗的产妇就诊人数出现了一个非显著的阶跃变化,增加了 0.11%(95%CI,-0.01%至 0.22%;P=0.07),每月接受心理治疗的产妇就诊人数的斜率变化也出现了一个显著的阶跃变化,增加了 0.03%(95%CI,0.00%至 0.05%;P=0.02)。在患有 PMAD 的产妇中,MHPAEA 与接受心理治疗的人数立即增加(0.72%;95%CI,0.26%至 1.18%;P=0.002),然后持续减少(-0.05%;-0.09%至-0.02%;P=0.001);ACA 与接受心理治疗的人数立即增加(0.77%;95%CI,0.26%至 1.27%;P=0.003)和持续增加(0.07%;95%CI,0.02%至 0.12%;P=0.005)有关。在这两个群体中,每次就诊的每月心理治疗 OOPC 均有所下降(-0.15;95%CI,-0.24 至-0.07;P<0.001,对于整体人群和-0.22;-0.32 至-0.12;P<0.001,对于 PMAD 人群),MHPAEA 通过立即增加(3.14;95%CI,1.56 至 4.73;P<0.001)和持续每月增加(0.07;95%CI,0.02 至 0.12;P=0.006)来提高费用,而 ACA 则通过立即增加(2.54;95%CI,0.54 至 4.54;P=0.01)和持续每月增加(0.10;95%CI,0.03 至 0.17;P=0.004)来提高费用。

结论和相关性

本研究发现 MHPAEA 和 ACA 的通过与接受治疗的产妇获得心理治疗的机会之间存在互补和复杂的关联。这些发现表明,继续努力改善这一人群获得心理健康治疗的机会是有价值的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/11316231/1adc9df1ebd4/jamanetwopen-e2426802-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/11316231/cf4942b2122c/jamanetwopen-e2426802-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/11316231/1e711bee4cc6/jamanetwopen-e2426802-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/11316231/1adc9df1ebd4/jamanetwopen-e2426802-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/11316231/cf4942b2122c/jamanetwopen-e2426802-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/11316231/1e711bee4cc6/jamanetwopen-e2426802-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e3/11316231/1adc9df1ebd4/jamanetwopen-e2426802-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Perinatal Psychotherapy Use and Costs Before and After Federally Mandated Health Insurance Coverage.围产期心理治疗的使用及联邦医疗保险覆盖前后的费用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2426802. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26802.
2
The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act Evaluation Study: Impact on Specialty Behavioral Health Care Utilization and Spending Among Carve-In Enrollees.《精神健康平等与成瘾公平法案》评估研究:对纳入医保的参保者专科行为健康护理利用情况及支出的影响
Med Care. 2017 Feb;55(2):164-172. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000635.
3
The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act evaluation study: Impact on specialty behavioral healthcare utilization and spending among enrollees with substance use disorders.《精神健康平等与成瘾公平法案》评估研究:对患有物质使用障碍的参保人专科行为健康护理利用情况及支出的影响
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Sep;80:67-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
4
Patterns of Health Insurance Coverage Around the Time of Pregnancy Among Women with Live-Born Infants--Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 29 States, 2009.2009年,29个州活产婴儿母亲孕期前后的医疗保险覆盖模式——妊娠风险评估监测系统
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Jun 19;64(4):1-19.
5
Out-of-Pocket Spending and Premium Contributions After Implementation of the Affordable Care Act.平价医疗法案实施后的自付支出和保费缴纳情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar 1;178(3):347-355. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8060.
6
Association of the US Affordable Care Act With Out-of-Pocket Spending and Catastrophic Health Expenditures Among Adult Patients With Traumatic Injury.美国平价医疗法案与创伤成年患者自付支出和灾难性医疗支出的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e200157. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0157.
7
Health Care Utilization and Costs for Older Adults Aging Into Medicare After the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施后步入医疗保险体系的老年人的医疗保健利用情况及费用
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jan 3;6(1):e245025. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5025.
8
Associations of Insurance Churn and Catastrophic Health Expenditures With Implementation of the Affordable Care Act Among Nonelderly Patients With Cancer in the United States.美国癌症非老年患者的保险退保率和灾难性医疗支出与平价医疗法案实施的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2124280. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24280.
9
The impact of the affordable care act on perinatal mood and anxiety disorder diagnosis and treatment rates among Michigan Medicaid enrollees 2012-2018.《平价医疗法案对密歇根州医疗补助计划参保者 2012-2018 年间围产期情绪和焦虑障碍诊断及治疗率的影响》
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 30;24(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10539-y.
10
Association of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act With Ambulatory Quality, Patient Experience, Utilization, and Cost, 2014-2016.2014-2016 年,《患者保护与平价医疗法案》与门诊质量、患者体验、利用和成本的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2218167. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.18167.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of the affordable care act on perinatal mood and anxiety disorder diagnosis and treatment rates among Michigan Medicaid enrollees 2012-2018.《平价医疗法案对密歇根州医疗补助计划参保者 2012-2018 年间围产期情绪和焦虑障碍诊断及治疗率的影响》
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 30;24(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10539-y.
2
Association of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act and the Affordable Care Act on severe maternal morbidity.精神健康平权法案和平价医疗法案对严重产妇发病率的影响。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2023 Nov-Dec;85:126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2023.10.006. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
3
Medicaid Expansion Associated With Some Improvements In Perinatal Mental Health.
医疗补助扩大与围产期心理健康的一些改善有关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Oct;40(10):1605-1611. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00776.
4
Interrupted time series analysis using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models: a guide for evaluating large-scale health interventions.使用自回归求和移动平均 (ARIMA) 模型的中断时间序列分析:评估大规模卫生干预措施的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Mar 22;21(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01235-8.
5
Association of Federal Mental Health Parity Legislation With Health Care Use and Spending Among High Utilizers of Services.联邦精神健康平权立法与服务高利用率者的医疗保健使用和支出的关联。
Med Care. 2019 Apr;57(4):245-255. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001076.
6
Fertility of Men and Women Aged 15-44 in the United States: National Survey of Family Growth, 2011-2015.美国15 - 44岁男性和女性的生育能力:2011 - 2015年全国家庭成长调查
Natl Health Stat Report. 2018 Jul(113):1-17.
7
The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): Overview of Design and Methodology.妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS):设计与方法概述。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Oct;108(10):1305-1313. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304563. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
8
Variation in the 12-Month Treatment Trajectories of Children and Adolescents After a Diagnosis of Depression.儿童和青少年抑郁症诊断后 12 个月治疗轨迹的变化。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Jan 1;172(1):49-56. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3808.
9
Peripartum depression: Early recognition improves outcomes.围产期抑郁症:早期识别可改善结局。
Cleve Clin J Med. 2017 May;84(5):388-396. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.84a.14060.
10
Women In The United States Experience High Rates Of Coverage 'Churn' In Months Before And After Childbirth.美国女性在分娩前后几个月的保险“转换”率很高。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Apr 1;36(4):598-606. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1241.