• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

猪群建立时间和结构对农场猪群个体间攻击强度的影响。

Effects of Herd Establishment Time and Structure on Group-on-Individual Aggression Intensity in Farm Pigs.

作者信息

Wang Zhen, Shi Zhengxiang, Li Hao, Liu Hui, Xiao Zhaowei, Wang Hao, Pu Shihua

机构信息

College of Water Resources & Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.

Chongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2024 Jul 31;14(15):2229. doi: 10.3390/ani14152229.

DOI:10.3390/ani14152229
PMID:39123756
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11310940/
Abstract

Aggression in farm animals affects welfare. Although one-on-one aggression was studied, group-on-individual aggression remains unresolved. This study aimed to examine how herd establishment times and structures influence aggression intensity (AI) of herds towards unfamiliar pigs. Six groups of pigs were established, with a new pig added every three days. AI was measured by skin lesion severity on the new pigs. A parabolic model based on the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm and conjoint analysis identified factors influencing AI. Results show AI was not significantly affected by herd size but was significantly influenced by the number of pens ( < 0.01). AI showed a significant association with elevated time (T) since the establishment of the herd in six pig herds (Kendall's tau-τ = 0.976, < 0.001). The effect of T on the AI became stronger as T increased, which was consistently validated in six pig herds. Furthermore, the interaction effect indicates a significant difference in AI between herds formed with two pens and those with more than two pens when T ≤ 12 ( < 0.05). However, as T increased beyond 12, the number of pens used to form the herd did not significantly affect AI. These findings highlight the complex interactions between herd establishment time and structural composition in shaping aggression intensity towards unfamiliar pigs.

摘要

农场动物的攻击性会影响其福利。尽管一对一的攻击性已得到研究,但群体对个体的攻击性仍未得到解决。本研究旨在探讨畜群建立时间和结构如何影响畜群对陌生猪的攻击强度(AI)。建立了六组猪群,每三天添加一头新猪。通过新猪的皮肤损伤严重程度来测量AI。基于Levenberg-Marquardt算法和联合分析的抛物线模型确定了影响AI的因素。结果表明,AI不受畜群规模的显著影响,但受猪栏数量的显著影响(<0.01)。在六个猪群中,AI与畜群建立后的时间(T)呈显著正相关(肯德尔tau-τ = 0.976,<0.001)。随着T的增加,T对AI的影响变得更强,这在六个猪群中得到了一致验证。此外,交互作用表明,当T≤12时,由两个猪栏组成的畜群和由两个以上猪栏组成的畜群之间的AI存在显著差异(<0.05)。然而,当T超过12时,用于组建畜群的猪栏数量对AI没有显著影响。这些发现突出了畜群建立时间和结构组成在塑造对陌生猪的攻击强度方面的复杂相互作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07c/11310940/d7714946f7dd/animals-14-02229-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07c/11310940/37264d580031/animals-14-02229-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07c/11310940/2ced23b7c57e/animals-14-02229-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07c/11310940/dff7f80407bb/animals-14-02229-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07c/11310940/d7714946f7dd/animals-14-02229-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07c/11310940/37264d580031/animals-14-02229-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07c/11310940/2ced23b7c57e/animals-14-02229-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07c/11310940/dff7f80407bb/animals-14-02229-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07c/11310940/d7714946f7dd/animals-14-02229-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Herd Establishment Time and Structure on Group-on-Individual Aggression Intensity in Farm Pigs.猪群建立时间和结构对农场猪群个体间攻击强度的影响。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Jul 31;14(15):2229. doi: 10.3390/ani14152229.
2
Effect of intramuscular vaccination against Lawsonia intracellularis on production parameters, diarrhea occurrence, antimicrobial treatment, bacterial shedding, and lean meat percentage in two Danish naturally infected finisher pig herds.肌肉内接种抗细胞内劳森菌对丹麦两个自然感染育肥猪群生产参数、腹泻发生、抗菌治疗、细菌脱落和瘦肉率的影响。
Prev Vet Med. 2023 Mar;212:105837. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105837. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
3
Effect of pens with an elevated platform on space utilization, skin lesions and growth performance in nursery pigs.平台笔对保育猪空间利用、皮肤损伤和生长性能的影响。
Animal. 2021 Jan;15(1):100002. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100002. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
4
Risk factors for the occurrence of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) in Danish pig herds.丹麦猪群中出现与家畜相关的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(LA-MRSA)的风险因素。
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Nov 1;159:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
5
The "Real Welfare" scheme: Identification of risk and protective factors for welfare outcomes in commercial pig farms in the UK.“真实福利”计划:英国商业养猪场福利结果的风险与保护因素识别
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Oct 1;146:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
6
More tail lesions among undocked than tail docked pigs in a conventional herd.在一个传统猪群中,未断尾的猪比断尾的猪有更多的尾部病变。
Animal. 2017 Oct;11(10):1825-1831. doi: 10.1017/S1751731117000490. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
7
Type and frequency of contacts between Belgian pig herds.比利时猪群之间的接触类型和频率。
Prev Vet Med. 2009 Jan 1;88(1):57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Oct 5.
8
The effect of docking length on the risk of tail biting, tail-directed behaviour, aggression and activity level of growing pigs kept under commercial conditions. docking 长度对商业条件下生长猪的咬尾风险、尾部导向行为、攻击性和活动水平的影响。
Animal. 2018 Dec;12(12):2609-2618. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118000563. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
9
Economic impact of different strategies to use sex-sorted sperm for reproductive management in seasonal-calving, pasture-based dairy herds.不同策略在季节性产犊、放牧型奶牛场的生殖管理中使用性别分选精子的经济影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Nov;104(11):11747-11758. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20150. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
10
Behavior and performance of pigs previously housed in large groups.先前饲养在大群体中的猪的行为和性能。
J Anim Sci. 2009 Apr;87(4):1472-8. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1202. Epub 2008 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavioral Transition Path and Pivotal Nodes Regulating Attack in Initial Encounters between Unfamiliar Pigs.陌生猪初次相遇时攻击行为的转变路径及关键调控节点
Animals (Basel). 2024 Sep 6;14(17):2595. doi: 10.3390/ani14172595.

本文引用的文献

1
Ecological, social, and intrinsic factors affecting wild orangutans' curiosity, assessed using a field experiment.运用野外实验评估影响野生猩猩好奇心的生态、社会和内在因素。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 14;13(1):13184. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39214-2.
2
An urgent call for global action to shift to regenerative farming.呼吁全球采取紧急行动转向再生农业。
Nat Food. 2021 Nov;2(11):846-847. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00405-7.
3
Mixed management in growing and finishing pigs: Differences between gender and their impacts on behavior, growth performance, and physiological parameters.
生长育肥猪的混群管理:性别差异及其对行为、生长性能和生理参数的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0284481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284481. eCollection 2023.
4
Farm animal welfare: Beyond "natural" behavior.农场动物福利:超越“自然”行为。
Science. 2023 Jan 27;379(6630):326-328. doi: 10.1126/science.ade5437. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
5
Effect of Phase Feeding, Space Allowance and Mixing on Productive Performance of Grower-Finisher Pigs.分阶段饲喂、饲养空间和混群对生长育肥猪生产性能的影响
Animals (Basel). 2022 Feb 7;12(3):390. doi: 10.3390/ani12030390.
6
The Impact of Grouping on Skin Lesions and Meat Quality of Pig Carcasses.分组对猪胴体皮肤损伤和肉质的影响。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 25;10(4):544. doi: 10.3390/ani10040544.
7
Experimental field evidence that out-group threats influence within-group behavior.实验性实地证据表明,群体外威胁会影响群体内行为。
Behav Ecol. 2019 Sep-Oct;30(5):1425-1435. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arz095. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
8
Estimation of indirect social genetic effects for skin lesion count in group-housed pigs by quantifying behavioral interactions1.通过量化群居猪的行为相互作用来估计皮肤损伤数量的间接社会遗传效应 1。
J Anim Sci. 2019 Sep 3;97(9):3658-3668. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz244.
9
Patients prioritize local recurrence risk over other attributes for surgical treatment of facial melanomas-Results of a stated preference survey and choice-based conjoint analysis.患者在接受面部黑色素瘤手术治疗时更看重局部复发风险,而非其他因素——基于选择偏好调查和联合分析的结果。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Aug;79(2):210-219.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.02.059. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
10
Social Control of Hypothalamus-Mediated Male Aggression.下丘脑介导的雄性攻击行为的社会控制
Neuron. 2017 Aug 16;95(4):955-970.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.046. Epub 2017 Jul 27.