Rejc Enrico, Zaccaron Simone, Bowersock Collin, Pisolkar Tanvi, Ugiliweneza Beatrice, Forrest Gail F, Agrawal Sunil, Harkema Susan J, Angeli Claudia A
Tim and Caroline Reynolds Center for Spinal Stimulation, Kessler Foundation, 1199 Pleasant Valley Way, West Orange, NJ 07052, USA.
Department of Medicine, University of Udine, P.le Kolbe 4, 33100 Udine (UD), Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 24;13(15):4309. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154309.
(1) . High-level spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts trunk control, leading to an impaired performance of upright postural tasks in sitting and standing. We previously showed that a novel robotic postural stand training with spinal cord epidural stimulation targeted at facilitating standing (Stand-scES) largely improved standing trunk control in individuals with high-level motor complete SCI. Here, we aimed at assessing the effects of robotic postural stand training with Stand-scES on sitting postural control in the same population. (2) . Individuals with cervical ( = 5) or high-thoracic ( = 1) motor complete SCI underwent approximately 80 sessions (1 h/day; 5 days/week) of robotic postural stand training with Stand-scES, which was performed with free hands (i.e., without using handlebars) and included periods of standing with steady trunk control, self-initiated trunk and arm movements, and trunk perturbations. Sitting postural control was assessed on a standard therapy mat, with and without scES targeted at facilitating sitting (Sit-scES), before and after robotic postural stand training. Independent sit time and trunk center of mass (CM) displacement were assessed during a 5 min time window to evaluate steady sitting control. Self-initiated antero-posterior and medial-lateral trunk movements were also attempted from a sitting position, with the goal of covering the largest distance in the respective cardinal directions. Finally, the four Neuromuscular Recovery Scale items focused on sitting trunk control (Sit, Sit-up, Trunk extension in sitting, Reverse sit-up) were assessed. (3) . In summary, neither statistically significant differences nor large Effect Size were promoted by robotic postural stand training for the sitting outcomes considered for analysis. (4) . The findings of the present study, together with previous observations, may suggest that robotic postural stand training with Stand-scES promoted trunk motor learning that was posture- and/or task-specific and, by itself, was not sufficient to significantly impact sitting postural control.
(1). 高位脊髓损伤(SCI)会破坏躯干控制,导致坐姿和站姿下的直立姿势任务表现受损。我们之前表明,一种针对促进站立的新型脊髓硬膜外刺激机器人姿势站立训练(Stand-scES)在很大程度上改善了高位运动完全性SCI患者的站立躯干控制。在此,我们旨在评估Stand-scES机器人姿势站立训练对同一人群坐姿控制的影响。(2). 患有颈髓(n = 5)或高位胸髓(n = 1)运动完全性SCI的个体接受了约80次(每天1小时;每周5天)的Stand-scES机器人姿势站立训练,训练时双手自由(即不使用扶手),包括躯干控制稳定的站立期、自发的躯干和手臂运动以及躯干扰动。在机器人姿势站立训练前后,在标准治疗垫上评估坐姿控制,评估时有无旨在促进坐姿的脊髓硬膜外刺激(Sit-scES)。在5分钟时间窗口内评估独立坐立时间和躯干质心(CM)位移,以评估稳定坐姿控制。还尝试从坐姿进行自发的前后和内外侧躯干运动,目标是在各自的基本方向上覆盖最大距离。最后,评估专注于坐姿躯干控制的四个神经肌肉恢复量表项目(坐立、仰卧起坐、坐姿躯干伸展、反向仰卧起坐)。(3). 总之,对于分析所考虑的坐姿结果,机器人姿势站立训练既未促进统计学上的显著差异,也未产生大的效应量。(4). 本研究的结果与先前的观察结果一起,可能表明Stand-scES机器人姿势站立训练促进了特定姿势和/或任务的躯干运动学习,但其本身不足以显著影响坐姿控制。