• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受血液透析患者的动静脉通路复发性血栓形成与通畅情况

Recurrent thrombosis and patency of the arteriovenous access in patients receiving hemodialysis.

作者信息

Weiss Ryan, Yu Qian, Funaki Brian, Hammes Mary

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2025 Jul;26(4):1249-1256. doi: 10.1177/11297298241260755. Epub 2024 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1177/11297298241260755
PMID:39126205
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thrombosis of the vascular access in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis are common and require timely interventional procedures to restore patency. The aim of the current study was to identify factors having a significant effect on patency rates after access thrombosis. Our hypothesis was the length of time between the initial clotting of the access and the subsequent percutaneous declotting impacts the patency rates of the vascular access.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients with a clotted arteriovenous access between Jan 1, 2011, and Jan 1, 2016, were included. Demographics, access history, and associated details of the access procedure were reviewed from the electronic medical record. Statistical analysis was done using -test and chi-square or fisher exact tests to compare arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) and arteriovenous grafts (AVG). Primary patency, defined as the time from index procedure to endpoint, was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test.

RESULTS

There were 883 percutaneous declotting procedures reviewed. About 351 procedures were performed in patients with an AVF and 532 with an AVG. The mean time from thrombosis to declotting was 1.71 ± 2.29 days. The overall median primary patency for both AVF and AVG was 43 days with no difference in patency between patients with AVF (39 days) versus AVG (42 days;  = 0.385). The time period from access thrombosis to declotting did not affect patency rates for either AVG or AVF ( = 0.385). On multivariable analysis, prior intervention (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.14-1.53,  < 0.001) and cardiovascular disease (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03-1.37,  = 0.016) were independently associated with access patency.

CONCLUSIONS

Time from thrombosis to declotting did not affect patency rates however once there was a thrombotic event, recurrent thrombosis requiring intervention was common with patency significantly decreased. Future prospective studies to validate our results and study pathogenic mechanisms of recurrent thrombosis are warranted.

摘要

背景

对于需要血液透析的终末期肾病患者,血管通路血栓形成很常见,需要及时采取介入措施以恢复通畅。本研究的目的是确定对通路血栓形成后通畅率有显著影响的因素。我们的假设是,通路初次凝血与随后的经皮清除血栓之间的时间长度会影响血管通路的通畅率。

方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,纳入了2011年1月1日至2016年1月1日期间动静脉通路发生血栓形成的患者。从电子病历中回顾了人口统计学、通路病史以及通路手术的相关细节。使用t检验、卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验进行统计分析,以比较动静脉内瘘(AVF)和动静脉移植物(AVG)。主要通畅率定义为从索引手术到终点的时间,使用Kaplan-Meier方法和对数秩检验进行分析。

结果

共回顾了883例经皮清除血栓手术。其中,AVF患者进行了约351例手术,AVG患者进行了532例手术。从血栓形成到清除血栓的平均时间为1.71±2.29天。AVF和AVG的总体主要通畅率中位数均为43天,AVF患者(39天)与AVG患者(42天;P = 0.385)的通畅率无差异。从通路血栓形成到清除血栓的时间段对AVG或AVF的通畅率均无影响(P = 0.385)。多变量分析显示,既往干预(HR:1.32,95%CI:1.14 - 1.53,P < 0.001)和心血管疾病(HR:1.19,95%CI:1.03 - 1.37,P = 0.016)与通路通畅独立相关。

结论

从血栓形成到清除血栓的时间不影响通畅率,然而一旦发生血栓事件,需要干预的复发性血栓形成很常见,且通畅率显著降低。有必要进行未来的前瞻性研究以验证我们的结果并研究复发性血栓形成的致病机制。

相似文献

1
Recurrent thrombosis and patency of the arteriovenous access in patients receiving hemodialysis.接受血液透析患者的动静脉通路复发性血栓形成与通畅情况
J Vasc Access. 2025 Jul;26(4):1249-1256. doi: 10.1177/11297298241260755. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
2
Interventions for thrombosed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts.血栓形成的血液透析动静脉瘘和移植物的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 14;2(2):CD013293. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013293.pub2.
3
The Alpha to Omega of Dialysis Access: Arteriovenous Fistula and Graft (Part 1).透析通路的来龙去脉:动静脉内瘘与移植物(第1部分)
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2025 Jul;59(5):513-527. doi: 10.1177/15385744251328396. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
4
Comparison between transposed arteriovenous fistulas and arteriovenous graft for the hemodialysis patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review.转位动静脉瘘与动静脉移植物在血液透析患者中的比较:荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Vasc Access. 2024 Mar;25(2):369-389. doi: 10.1177/11297298221102875. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
5
A comparison of arteriovenous grafts and fistulas in lower extremity hemodialysis procedures.下肢血液透析手术中动静脉移植物与动静脉内瘘的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jul;82(1):240-247. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.03.003. Epub 2025 Mar 8.
6
Medical adjuvant treatment to increase patency of arteriovenous fistulae and grafts.用于提高动静脉内瘘和移植物通畅率的医学辅助治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 16;2015(7):CD002786. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002786.pub3.
7
Mechanical thrombectomy with the InThrill device for thrombosed hemodialysis access: A single center experience.使用InThrill装置进行机械性血栓切除术治疗血栓形成的血液透析通路:单中心经验。
J Vasc Access. 2025 Jul;26(4):1288-1293. doi: 10.1177/11297298241273605. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
8
Antiplatelet agents for preventing thrombosis after peripheral arterial bypass surgery.用于预防外周动脉搭桥术后血栓形成的抗血小板药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 19;2015(2):CD000535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000535.pub3.
9
A systematic review and meta-analysis of one-stage versus two-stage brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula creation.一期与两期肱动脉-贵要静脉动静脉内瘘建立的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;68(1):285-297. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.428.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of systemic intraoperative anticoagulation during arteriovenous access formation for dialysis.透析动静脉通路建立期间全身术中抗凝的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Access. 2016 Jan-Feb;17(1):1-5. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000484. Epub 2015 Dec 7.