USDA-ARS, Northwest Watershed Research Center, Boise, Idaho, USA.
J Environ Qual. 2024 Nov-Dec;53(6):861-868. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20617. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
The Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network, through its Common Experiment (CE) framework, contrasts prevailing and alternative agricultural practices for efficacy and sustainability within the indicator domains of environment, productivity, economics, and society. Invasive species, wildfire, and climate change are principal threats to Great Basin agroecosystems. Prescribed grazing may be an effective tool for restoring lands degraded by these disturbances. At the Great Basin (GB) LTAR site headquartered in Boise, ID, our contribution to the CE contrasts a prevailing (PRV), cattle grazing practice of fixed moderate stocking and duration with an alternative (ALT), prescribed grazing practice called high-intensity low-frequency (HILF) grazing where stocking and duration are tailored to suppress invasive annual grass competition with native or desirable plant species and thus promote recovery of rangelands degraded by annual grass invasion and recurrent wildfire. Preliminary results indicate cheatgrass density and fuel height have been reduced in ALT-treated paddocks compared to PRV paddocks. Since its inception in 2014, our GB CE has been a research co-production effort among ranchers, public land managers, and researchers. Future directions for this research will center on expanding the experiment to multiple study areas to better address the scope of the annual grass/wildfire problem. We expect this research will lead to effective and sustainable grazing practices for restoring >41 million hectares of degraded rangelands in the Great Basin and other areas of the western United States.
长期农业生态系统研究 (LTAR) 网络通过其共同实验 (CE) 框架,在环境、生产力、经济和社会等指标领域对比流行和替代农业实践的效果和可持续性。入侵物种、野火和气候变化是大盆地农业生态系统的主要威胁。规定放牧可能是恢复受这些干扰退化土地的有效工具。在总部位于爱达荷州博伊西的大盆地 (GB) LTAR 站点,我们对 CE 的贡献对比了一种流行的 (PRV) 牛放牧实践,即固定适度的放牧强度和持续时间,以及一种替代的 (ALT) 放牧实践,称为高强度低频率 (HILF) 放牧,其中放牧强度和持续时间可根据抑制入侵一年生草本植物与本地或理想植物物种的竞争来定制,从而促进受一年生草本植物入侵和反复野火退化的牧场恢复。初步结果表明,与 PRV 牧场相比,ALT 处理的围场内的雀麦密度和燃料高度降低了。自 2014 年成立以来,我们的 GB CE 一直是牧场主、公共土地管理者和研究人员之间的合作研究努力。这项研究的未来方向将集中在扩大实验到多个研究区域,以更好地解决一年生草本植物/野火问题的范围。我们预计这项研究将为恢复大盆地和美国西部其他地区超过 4100 万公顷退化牧场提供有效和可持续的放牧实践。