Suppr超能文献

拉莫三嗪与左乙拉西坦治疗生育年龄女性青少年失神癫痫的比较:一项贝叶斯再分析。

Lamotrigine vs levetiracetam in female patients of childbearing age with juvenile absence epilepsy: A Bayesian reanalysis.

机构信息

Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Department of Precision Medicine and Genomics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2024 Oct;65(10):2897-2908. doi: 10.1111/epi.18087. Epub 2024 Aug 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Women of childbearing age with juvenile absence epilepsy (JAE) face treatment challenges due to limited access to safe and effective anti-seizure medications (ASMs). In a previous study we compared the effectiveness of levetiracetam (LEV) and lamotrigine (LTG) in women with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), highlighting a superiority of LEV in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. In this study, we specifically reanalyzed, through a Bayesian approach and by expanding the previously published cohort, the comparative effectiveness of these ASMs as initial monotherapy in JAE.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, comparative effectiveness study on women of childbearing age diagnosed with JAE and prescribed LEV or LTG as the initial ASM. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) Bayesian Cox proportional hazard models were employed to evaluate treatment failure (TF) due to ineffectiveness and ASM retention. The patients' center of provenance and year of prescription were considered as random effect factors. Posterior probabilities and relative log-risk distribution were computed, and the distribution of posterior draws was analyzed to assess the evidence supporting LTG superiority over LEV.

RESULTS

Of 123 patients, those treated with LTG (n = 67) demonstrated lower TF and higher ASM retention than those treated with LEV (n = 56), with the IPTW-weighted Bayesian Cox proportional hazards model showing a 99.2% posterior probability of LTG being superior on TF and a 99.5% probability on ASM retention. Additional analyses on ≥50% and ≥75% seizure reduction through IPTW-weighted Bayesian logistic regression largely confirmed these findings, whereas the two ASMs did not show evident differences in terms of seizure freedom. The two ASMs showed comparable safety profiles, with only a minority of patients discontinuing treatment due to side effects.

SIGNIFICANCE

Bayesian reanalysis supports LTG as first-line monotherapy for JAE in women of childbearing age, emphasizing the importance of individualized treatment strategies in women with IGE. This study underscores the value of Bayesian methods in refining clinical research and treatment decisions.

摘要

目的

由于获得安全有效的抗癫痫药物(ASM)的机会有限,生育年龄的青少年失神癫痫(JAE)女性面临治疗挑战。在之前的一项研究中,我们比较了左乙拉西坦(LEV)和拉莫三嗪(LTG)在特发性全面性癫痫(IGE)女性中的有效性,突出了 LEV 在青少年肌阵挛性癫痫中的优越性。在这项研究中,我们通过贝叶斯方法并通过扩展之前发表的队列,专门重新分析了这些 ASM 作为 JAE 初始单药治疗的比较有效性。

方法

我们对诊断为 JAE 并开处方 LEV 或 LTG 作为初始 ASM 的生育年龄女性进行了一项多中心、回顾性、比较有效性研究。采用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)贝叶斯 Cox 比例风险模型评估因无效和 ASM 保留而导致的治疗失败(TF)。患者的原籍中心和处方年份被视为随机效应因素。计算了后验概率和相对对数风险分布,并分析了后验图的分布,以评估支持 LTG 优于 LEV 的证据。

结果

在 123 名患者中,与 LEV 治疗组(n=56)相比,LTG 治疗组(n=67)的 TF 更低,ASM 保留率更高,IPT-W 加权贝叶斯 Cox 比例风险模型显示 LTG 在 TF 上具有 99.2%的后验概率优于 LEV,在 ASM 保留上具有 99.5%的概率。通过 IPTW 加权贝叶斯逻辑回归进行的额外分析表明,≥50%和≥75%的癫痫发作减少,这些发现基本得到证实,而两种 ASM 在无癫痫发作方面没有明显差异。两种 ASM 具有相似的安全性特征,只有少数患者因副作用而停止治疗。

意义

贝叶斯重新分析支持 LTG 作为生育年龄 JAE 女性的一线单药治疗,强调了在 IGE 女性中采用个体化治疗策略的重要性。这项研究强调了贝叶斯方法在完善临床研究和治疗决策方面的价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验