Zhang Yongfeng, Wu Peng
Department of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Xianyang, Xianyang, Shaanxi, China.
Department of Neurology, Honghui Hospital Affiliated of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 22;104(34):e43506. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043506.
Epilepsy is a common neurological disease that seriously affects the quality of life of patients. There are many clinical drugs for treatment. Levetiracetam and lacoxamide have attracted much attention in recent years. This study focuses on comparing the efficacy and safety of the 2 treatments for epilepsy, in order to provide strong support for clinical precision medicine. In this retrospective study, we collected the case data of 82 patients. Eighty-two patients with epilepsy admitted to our hospital from March 2022 to February 2023 were selected and evenly divided into levetiracetam group (41 cases) and lacoxamide group (41 cases) by different treatment method. The whole treatment cycle lasted 24 weeks. The effectiveness measures included seizure frequency, seizure duration, electroencephalogram (EEG) improvement, cognitive function score, and quality of life scale score. The safety assessment included the incidence, type, and severity of adverse reactions. In terms of effectiveness, the seizure frequency of levetiacetam group after treatment was reduced by about (42.0 ± 3.5) % (P < .05), the seizure duration was shortened by (35.0 ± 2.8) seconds (P < .05), and the normalization ratio of EEG reached (38.0 ± 4.2) % (P < .05). Compared with before treatment, the cognitive function score was increased by (12.0 ± 1.5) points (P < .05), the quality of life scale score was increased by (18.0 ± 2.2) points (P < .05). In lacosamine group, the seizure frequency was decreased by about (39.0 ± 3.2) % (P < .05), the seizure duration was shortened by (30.0 ± 2.5) s (P < .05), and the improvement rate of EEG was (35.0 ± 3.8) % (P < .05). The cognitive function score increased (10.0 ± 1.3) points (P < .05), and the quality of life scale score increased (15.0 ± 2.0) points (P < .05). Both levetiracetam and lacoxamine show significant effectiveness in the treatment of epilepsy, which can effectively control seizure frequency and duration from multiple dimensions, improve EEG, and enhance patients' cognition and quality of life. In terms of safety, the characteristics of adverse reactions were different, and levetiracetam was generally well tolerated.
癫痫是一种常见的神经系统疾病,严重影响患者的生活质量。临床上有多种治疗药物。左乙拉西坦和拉科酰胺近年来备受关注。本研究旨在比较这两种癫痫治疗方法的疗效和安全性,为临床精准用药提供有力支持。在这项回顾性研究中,我们收集了82例患者的病例数据。选取2022年3月至2023年2月在我院住院的82例癫痫患者,根据不同治疗方法将其平均分为左乙拉西坦组(41例)和拉科酰胺组(41例)。整个治疗周期持续24周。疗效指标包括癫痫发作频率、发作持续时间、脑电图(EEG)改善情况、认知功能评分和生活质量量表评分。安全性评估包括不良反应的发生率、类型和严重程度。在疗效方面,左乙拉西坦组治疗后癫痫发作频率降低约(42.0±3.5)%(P<0.05),发作持续时间缩短(35.0±2.8)秒(P<0.05),脑电图正常化率达到(38.0±4.2)%(P<0.05)。与治疗前相比,认知功能评分增加(12.0±1.5)分(P<0.05),生活质量量表评分增加(18.0±2.2)分(P<0.05)。拉科酰胺组癫痫发作频率降低约(39.0±3.2)%(P<0.05),发作持续时间缩短(30.0±2.5)秒(P<0.05),脑电图改善率为(35.0±3.8)%(P<0.05)。认知功能评分增加(10.0±1.3)分(P<0.05),生活质量量表评分增加(15.0±2.0)分(P<0.05)。左乙拉西坦和拉科酰胺在癫痫治疗中均显示出显著疗效,可从多个维度有效控制癫痫发作频率和持续时间,改善脑电图,并提高患者的认知和生活质量。在安全性方面,不良反应特点不同,左乙拉西坦总体耐受性良好。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025-8-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-9-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-9-5
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-4-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-6-29
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-15
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-10-24
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001
Med Lett Drugs Ther. 2024-8-5
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024-4-26
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-10-16