The Ionian School, Early Evolution of Life Department, Genetic Code and tRNA Origin Laboratory, Via Roma 19, 67030, Alfedena, L'Aquila, Italy.
Biosystems. 2024 Oct;244:105287. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105287. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
I analyzed the polyphyletic origin of glycyl-tRNA synthetase (GlyRS) and lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysRS), making plausible the following implications. The fact that the genetic code needed to evolve aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs) only very late would be in perfect agreement with a late origin, in the main phyletic lineages, of both GlyRS and LysRS. Indeed, as suggested by the coevolution theory, since the genetic code was structured by biosynthetic relationships between amino acids and as these occurred on tRNA-like molecules which were evidently already loaded with amino acids during its structuring, this made possible a late origin of ARSs. All this corroborates the coevolution theory of the origin of the genetic code to the detriment of theories which would instead predict an early intervention of the action of ARSs in organizing the genetic code. Furthermore, the assembly of the GlyRS and LysRS protein domains in main phyletic lineages is itself at least evidence of the possibility that ancestral genes were assembled using pieces of genetic material that coded these protein domains. This is in accordance with the exon theory of genes which postulates that ancestral exons coded for protein domains or modules that were assembled to form the first genes. This theory is exemplified precisely in the evolution of both GlyRS and LysRS which occurred through the assembly of protein domains in the main phyletic lineages, as analyzed here. Furthermore, this late assembly of protein domains of these proteins into the two main phyletic lineages, i.e. a polyphyletic origin of both GlyRS and LysRS, appears to corroborate the progenote evolutionary stage for both LUCA and at least the first part of the evolutionary stages of the ancestor of bacteria and that of archaea. Indeed, this polyphyletic origin would imply that the genetic code was still evolving because at least two ARSs, i.e. proteins that make the genetic code possible today, were still evolving. This would imply that the evolutionary stages involved were characterized not by cells but by protocells, that is, by progenotes because this is precisely the definition of a progenote. This conclusion would be strengthened by the observation that both GlyRS and LysRS originating in the phyletic lineages leading to bacteria and archaea, would demonstrate that, more generally, proteins were most likely still in rapid and progressive evolution. Namely, a polyphyletic origin of proteins which would qualify at least the initial phase of the evolutionary stage of the ancestor of bacteria and that of archaea as stages belonging to the progenote.
我分析了甘氨酰-tRNA 合成酶(GlyRS)和赖氨酰-tRNA 合成酶(LysRS)的多系起源,提出了以下几点推论。遗传密码需要进化氨酰-tRNA 合成酶(ARSs)的事实表明,这一过程发生得非常晚,这与 GlyRS 和 LysRS 在主要进化谱系中的晚期起源是完全一致的。事实上,正如共进化理论所表明的,由于遗传密码是由氨基酸之间的生物合成关系构建的,而这些关系发生在 tRNA 样分子上,在其构建过程中,这些分子显然已经加载了氨基酸,这使得 ARSs 的起源成为可能。所有这些都证实了遗传密码起源的共进化理论,而不是那些预测 ARSs 早期干预遗传密码组织的理论。此外,在主要进化谱系中 GlyRS 和 LysRS 蛋白质结构域的组装本身至少证明了这样一种可能性,即祖先基因是使用编码这些蛋白质结构域的遗传物质片段组装而成的。这符合基因的外显子理论,该理论假设,祖先外显子编码的是蛋白质结构域或模块,这些模块被组装起来形成第一个基因。这种理论在 GlyRS 和 LysRS 的进化中得到了精确的例证,这两种进化都是通过主要进化谱系中蛋白质结构域的组装来实现的。此外,这两种蛋白质的蛋白质结构域在两个主要进化谱系中的晚期组装,即 GlyRS 和 LysRS 的多系起源,似乎证实了 LUCA 和细菌祖先以及古菌祖先的进化阶段的前半部分都处于前原核生物阶段。事实上,这种多系起源表明遗传密码仍在进化,因为至少有两种 ARSs,即今天使遗传密码成为可能的蛋白质,仍在进化。这意味着涉及的进化阶段的特征不是由细胞而是由原细胞,也就是前原核生物,因为这正是前原核生物的定义。这一结论将得到以下观察结果的加强,即起源于细菌和古菌进化谱系的 GlyRS 和 LysRS 表明,更普遍地说,蛋白质很可能仍在快速和持续进化。也就是说,蛋白质的多系起源至少可以将细菌和古菌祖先的进化阶段的初始阶段定性为前原核生物阶段。