• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刺激频率对帕金森病双侧丘脑底核深部脑刺激后言语流畅性的影响

Impact of Stimulation Frequency on Verbal Fluency Following Bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.

作者信息

Busteed Laura, García-Sánchez Carmen, Pascual-Sedano Berta, Grunden Nicholas, Gironell Alexandre, Kulisevsky Jaime, Pagonabarraga Javier

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.

Movement Disorders Unit, Neurology Department, Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2025 Jan 21;40(1):22-32. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acae062.

DOI:10.1093/arclin/acae062
PMID:39127889
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The effects of stimulation frequency on verbal fluency (VF) following subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) are not well understood. The present study examines the impact stimulation frequency has on VF following bilateral STN-DBS in PD.

METHODS

Prospective study of 38 consecutive patients with PD with low frequency STN-DBS (LFS) (n = 10) and high frequency STN-DBS (HFS) (n = 14), and a non-operated PD control group consisting of patients with fluctuating response to dopaminergic medication (n = 14) homogeneous in age, education, disease duration, and global cognitive function. Patients were evaluated on VF tasks (letter, semantic, action verbs, alternating). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to assess distinctions between groups. Pre- and post-surgical comparisons of fluencies were performed for operated groups. A mixed ANOVA was applied to the data to evaluate the interaction between treatment (HFS vs. LFS) and time (pre- vs. post-surgery). Strategy use (clustering and switching) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Semantic and letter fluency performance revealed significant differences between HFS and LFS groups. Pre- and post-surgical comparisons revealed HFS negatively affected letter, semantic, and action fluencies, but LFS had no effect on VF. No interaction effect or main effect of treatment was found. Main effect of time was significant for semantic and action fluencies indicating a decrease in postoperative fluency performance. Patients with LFS produced larger average cluster sizes than patients with HFS.

CONCLUSION

LFS may be less detrimental to VF, but these findings suggest that VF decline following STN-DBS is not caused by stimulation frequency alone.

摘要

目的

帕金森病(PD)患者丘脑底核深部脑刺激(STN-DBS)后刺激频率对言语流畅性(VF)的影响尚未完全明确。本研究探讨双侧STN-DBS后刺激频率对PD患者VF的影响。

方法

对38例连续的PD患者进行前瞻性研究,其中低频STN-DBS(LFS)组(n = 10)和高频STN-DBS(HFS)组(n = 14),以及一个未手术的PD对照组,该对照组由对多巴胺能药物反应波动的患者组成(n = 14),在年龄、教育程度、病程和整体认知功能方面具有同质性。对患者进行VF任务(字母、语义、动作动词、交替)评估。进行单因素方差分析(ANOVA)以评估组间差异。对手术组进行手术前后流畅性比较。应用混合ANOVA分析数据,以评估治疗(HFS与LFS)和时间(术前与术后)之间的相互作用。评估策略使用(聚类和转换)情况。

结果

语义和字母流畅性表现显示HFS组和LFS组之间存在显著差异。手术前后比较显示,HFS对字母、语义和动作流畅性有负面影响,但LFS对VF没有影响。未发现治疗的交互作用或主效应。时间的主效应在语义和动作流畅性方面显著,表明术后流畅性表现下降。LFS患者产生的平均聚类大小比HFS患者大。

结论

LFS对VF的损害可能较小,但这些发现表明STN-DBS后VF下降并非仅由刺激频率引起。

相似文献

1
Impact of Stimulation Frequency on Verbal Fluency Following Bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.刺激频率对帕金森病双侧丘脑底核深部脑刺激后言语流畅性的影响
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2025 Jan 21;40(1):22-32. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acae062.
2
Dissociable effects of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation surgery and acute stimulation on verbal fluency in Parkinson's disease.丘脑底核深部脑刺激手术和急性刺激对帕金森病言语流畅性的可分离影响。
Behav Brain Res. 2020 Jun 18;388:112621. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112621. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
3
Effect of Low versus High Frequency Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation on Speech Intelligibility and Verbal Fluency in Parkinson's Disease: A Double-Blind Study.低频与高频丘脑底核电刺激对帕金森病患者言语清晰度和言语流畅性的影响:一项双盲研究。
J Parkinsons Dis. 2019;9(1):141-151. doi: 10.3233/JPD-181368.
4
Effect of low-frequency deep brain stimulation on sensory thresholds in Parkinson's disease.低频脑深部电刺激对帕金森病感觉阈值的影响。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;126(2):397-403. doi: 10.3171/2016.2.JNS152231. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
5
Deep Brain Stimulation Frequency of the Subthalamic Nucleus Affects Phonemic and Action Fluency in Parkinson's Disease.丘脑底核的深部脑刺激频率影响帕金森病的音素流畅性和动作流畅性。
Parkinsons Dis. 2016;2016:6760243. doi: 10.1155/2016/6760243. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
6
Anterior lead location predicts verbal fluency decline following STN-DBS in Parkinson's disease.前导电极位置可预测 STN-DBS 治疗帕金森病后言语流畅性下降。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2021 Nov;92:36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.10.012. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
7
Alternating verbal fluency performance following bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease.双侧丘脑底核脑深部电刺激治疗帕金森病后交替言语流畅性表现。
Eur J Neurol. 2012 Dec;19(12):1525-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03759.x. Epub 2012 May 26.
8
Decline in verbal fluency after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a microlesion effect of the electrode trajectory?苍白球内侧核深部脑刺激后帕金森病言语流畅性下降:电极轨迹的微损伤效应?
J Parkinsons Dis. 2015;5(1):95-104. doi: 10.3233/JPD-140443.
9
Verbal Fluency in Parkinson's Patients with and without Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus: A Meta-analysis.接受和未接受双侧丘脑底核深部脑刺激的帕金森病患者的语言流畅性:一项荟萃分析。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016 Apr;22(4):478-85. doi: 10.1017/S1355617716000035. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
10
Frequency-dependent reciprocal modulation of verbal fluency and motor functions in subthalamic deep brain stimulation.丘脑底核深部脑刺激中言语流畅性与运动功能的频率依赖性相互调制
Arch Neurol. 2006 Sep;63(9):1273-6. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.9.1273.

引用本文的文献

1
Parkinson's disease and deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS): long-term disease evaluation and neuropsychological outcomes in a 9-year matched-controlled study.帕金森病与丘脑底核深部脑刺激术(STN-DBS):一项为期9年的匹配对照研究中的长期疾病评估及神经心理学结果
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jan 23;48(1):74. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03231-8.