Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Virginia Consortium Program in Clinical Psychology, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Psychosom Res. 2024 Oct;185:111878. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111878. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
Affect regulation theories of eating disorders (ED) posit that negative affect increases in the hours before and decreases following disordered eating behaviors (DEBs) in daily life, yet findings from studies assessing affective changes post-DEBs are mixed. This inconsistency may be due to the previously unassessed role of other transdiagnostic processes in these associations, such as interoception (the ability to sense and integrate information from bodily sensations). To address this research gap, the present study examined whether different interoception dimensions moderated negative affect trajectories surrounding DEBs in the natural environment.
150 women with ED pathology (Mage = 21.0, SD = 4.1) completed 4 surveys targeting affect and DEBs each day for a 10-day ecological momentary assessment period. Polynomial multilevel models examined negative affect trajectories pre- and post-DEBs (dietary restriction, overeating, loss of control eating), and whether these trajectories varied based on daily interoception dimensions (not distracting, self-regulation, body listening and trust).
Negative affect increased prior to loss of control eating-but not dietary restriction or overeating-and decreased following all DEBs. Further, the magnitude of the decrease in negative affect that emerged post-dietary restriction decreased in strength as daily "not distracting" interoception increased. The other interoception dimensions did not moderate negative affect trajectories surrounding DEBs.
Allowing oneself to experience (vs. distract from) uncomfortable bodily sensations may weaken affect dysregulation processes that follow dietary restriction in daily life and are theorized to maintain DEBs. These results provide insight that may strengthen EDs theories, research, and inform interoception-focused interventions.
进食障碍(ED)的情绪调节理论假设,在日常生活中,负性情绪在进食障碍行为(DEB)前几个小时增加,并在之后减少,但评估 DEB 后情绪变化的研究结果存在差异。这种不一致可能是由于以前未评估的其他跨诊断过程在这些关联中的作用,例如内感受(感知和整合来自身体感觉信息的能力)。为了解决这一研究空白,本研究检验了在自然环境中,不同的内感受维度是否调节了 DEB 周围的负性情绪轨迹。
150 名有 ED 病史的女性(Mage=21.0,SD=4.1)在 10 天的生态瞬间评估期间,每天完成 4 次针对情绪和 DEB 的调查。多项式多层模型检验了 DEB(节食、暴食、失控进食)前后的负性情绪轨迹,以及这些轨迹是否基于日常内感受维度(不分散注意力、自我调节、倾听身体和信任)而有所不同。
负性情绪在失控进食前增加,但在节食或暴食后减少。此外,节食后负性情绪减少的幅度随着每日“不分散注意力”内感受的增加而减弱。其他内感受维度并没有调节 DEB 周围的负性情绪轨迹。
允许自己体验(而不是分散注意力)不舒服的身体感觉可能会削弱日常生活中节食后出现的情绪失调过程,这些过程被认为是维持 ED 的原因。这些结果提供了可能增强 ED 理论、研究并为以内感受为重点的干预措施提供信息的见解。