• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同时引入四项干预措施以改善急诊科流程。一项质量改进项目。

Improving emergency department flow by introducing four interventions simultaneously. A quality improvement project.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Haaglanden Medical Center, P.O. Box 432, 2501 CK The Hague, the Netherlands.

Department of Trauma Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, P.O. Box 432, 2501 CK The Hague, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Int Emerg Nurs. 2024 Sep;76:101499. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101499. Epub 2024 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101499
PMID:39128253
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency department (ED) crowding is a widespread issue with adverse effects on patient care and outcomes.

LOCAL PROBLEM

ED crowding exacerbates wait times and compromises patient care, prompting opportunities for internal process improvement.

METHOD

Over one week, the ED flow project team implemented four interventions, including an additional triage station, to optimize patient flow. We compared triage times, length of stay, crowding levels, and patient experiences with two control periods.

RESULTS

During peak hours, waiting times to triage decreased significantly with a median of 20 min (IQR 15-30) in the project week and 26 min (IQR 18-37) in the control weeks. Self-referrals decreased, while general practitioner referrals remained unchanged. Individual patient length of stay was unaffected, but crowding reduced notably during the project week. We found no difference in patient experiences between the periods.

CONCLUSION

The interventions contributed to reduced crowding and improved patient flow. The dedication of the ED flow project team and the ED nurses was crucial to these outcomes. An additional triage station during peak hours in the ED was established as a structural change.

摘要

背景

急诊部门(ED)拥堵是一个普遍存在的问题,对患者的治疗和预后都有不良影响。

本地问题

ED 拥堵加剧了等待时间,并影响了患者的治疗,因此需要进行内部流程改进。

方法

在一周的时间里,ED 流程项目团队实施了四项干预措施,包括增加一个分诊站,以优化患者的流程。我们将两个控制期的分诊时间、住院时间、拥堵程度和患者体验进行了比较。

结果

在高峰时段,分诊的等待时间显著缩短,项目周的中位数为 20 分钟(IQR 15-30),而对照周的中位数为 26 分钟(IQR 18-37)。自诊患者减少,而全科医生的转诊数量保持不变。患者的个体住院时间没有变化,但项目周的拥堵程度明显降低。我们没有发现两个时期患者体验有差异。

结论

这些干预措施有助于减少拥堵,改善患者的流程。ED 流程项目团队和 ED 护士的奉献精神对这些结果至关重要。在 ED 的高峰时段增加一个分诊站是一个结构性的改变。

相似文献

1
Improving emergency department flow by introducing four interventions simultaneously. A quality improvement project.同时引入四项干预措施以改善急诊科流程。一项质量改进项目。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2024 Sep;76:101499. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101499. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
2
Delayed flow is a risk to patient safety: A mixed method analysis of emergency department patient flow.延迟流动对患者安全构成风险:急诊科患者流动的混合方法分析。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2021 Jan;54:100956. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2020.100956. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
3
Medical Team Evaluation: Effect on Emergency Department Waiting Time and Length of Stay.医疗团队评估:对急诊科候诊时间和住院时间的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 22;11(4):e0154372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154372. eCollection 2016.
4
Are Split Flow and Provider in Triage Models in the Emergency Department Effective in Reducing Discharge Length of Stay?急诊科分诊模式中的分流流程和提供者对减少出院住院时间是否有效?
J Emerg Nurs. 2016 Nov;42(6):487-491. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
5
Decreasing length of stay in the emergency department with a split emergency severity index 3 patient flow model.采用分段式 3 级急诊严重指数患者流程模型缩短急诊科住院时间。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Nov;20(11):1171-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12249.
6
A 5-year time study analysis of emergency department patient care efficiency.急诊科患者护理效率的5年时间研究分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Sep;34(3):326-35. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70126-5.
7
Pivot Nursing: An Alternative to Traditional ED Triage.枢纽式护理:传统急诊科分诊的替代方案。
J Emerg Nurs. 2016 Sep;42(5):395-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2015.07.014. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
8
Impact of a patient-flow physician coordinator on waiting times and length of stay in an emergency department: A before-after cohort study.患者流量医生协调员对急诊科等候时间和住院时间的影响:一项前后队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 14;13(12):e0209035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209035. eCollection 2018.
9
Predictive variables of an emergency department quality and performance indicator: a 1-year prospective, observational, cohort study evaluating hospital and emergency census variables and emergency department time interval measurements.预测急诊质量和绩效指标的变量:一项为期 1 年的前瞻性、观察性队列研究,评估医院和急诊人数变量以及急诊部门时间间隔测量。
Emerg Med J. 2013 Aug;30(8):638-45. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201404. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
10
Interventions to improve emergency department throughput and care delivery indicators: A systematic review and meta-analysis.干预措施以改善急诊科吞吐量和医疗服务提供指标:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;31(8):789-804. doi: 10.1111/acem.14946. Epub 2024 Jun 3.