• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学校体育活动整体推广:来自美国小学的研究结果。

Whole-of-School Physical Activity Promotion: Findings From Elementary Schools in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, UTHealth Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas.

Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, UTHealth Houston School of Public Health, Austin, Texas.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2024 Dec;67(6):960-967. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.08.003. Epub 2024 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2024.08.003
PMID:39128591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11585414/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Schools can support students' participation in physical activity by offering opportunities consistent with a Whole-of-School (WOS) approach; however, the extent to which physical activity opportunities are provided and how school-level characteristics associate with their use remains unclear. This study examined how elementary schools' use a WOS approach to promote physical activity, as well as associations between school-level characteristics and physical activity opportunities provided.

METHODS

Survey data was collected from 162 elementary schools participating in the NFL PLAY 60 FitnessGram Project during the 2022-2023 school year. A WOS index (ranging from 0 to 12) was created from responses by school staff on questions about 6 physical activity practices (physical education, recess, before- and after-school programs, classroom-based approaches, active transport). Multivariable regression models examined associations between school characteristics and WOS index scores. Analyses were completed in Spring 2024.

RESULTS

Fully adjusted models indicated a statistically significant difference between the percentage of economically disadvantaged students served and WOS index score. Schools serving between 20% and 39% (p<0.001), 40%-59% (p<0.01), 60%-79% (p<0.01) and ≥80% (p<0.001) economically disadvantaged students scored significantly lower on the WOS index compared to schools with 0%-19% economically disadvantaged students.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies are needed to examine disparities in physical activity practices consistent with a WOS approach to understand the implications on health, academic performance, and other key outcomes. This information can inform the development of strategies to address disparities and ensure youth have equitable access to school-based physical activity opportunities.

摘要

简介

学校可以通过提供与全人教育(WOS)方法一致的机会来支持学生参与体育活动;然而,提供的体育活动机会的程度以及学校层面的特征与它们的使用之间的关联仍然不清楚。本研究考察了小学如何采用 WOS 方法来促进体育活动,以及学校层面的特征与提供的体育活动机会之间的关联。

方法

在 2022-2023 学年,调查数据从参与 NFL PLAY 60 FitnessGram 项目的 162 所小学中收集。根据学校工作人员对 6 种体育活动实践(体育教育、课间休息、课前和课后项目、课堂方法、主动交通)问题的回答,创建了一个 WOS 指数(范围从 0 到 12)。多变量回归模型考察了学校特征与 WOS 指数得分之间的关联。分析于 2024 年春季完成。

结果

完全调整后的模型表明,服务的经济困难学生比例与 WOS 指数得分之间存在统计学上的显著差异。服务 20%-39%(p<0.001)、40%-59%(p<0.01)、60%-79%(p<0.01)和≥80%(p<0.001)经济困难学生的 WOS 指数得分显著低于服务 0%-19%经济困难学生的学校。

结论

需要进行研究,以检查与 WOS 方法一致的体育活动实践中的差异,以了解对健康、学业成绩和其他关键结果的影响。这些信息可以为制定解决差异的策略提供信息,并确保年轻人有平等获得基于学校的体育活动机会的机会。

相似文献

1
Whole-of-School Physical Activity Promotion: Findings From Elementary Schools in the United States.学校体育活动整体推广:来自美国小学的研究结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Dec;67(6):960-967. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.08.003. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
2
Bridging Public Health and Education: Results of a School-Based Physical Activity Program to Increase Student Fitness.架起公共卫生与教育的桥梁:一项以学校为基础的体育活动计划提高学生身体素质的成果。
Public Health Rep. 2017 Nov/Dec;132(2_suppl):81S-87S. doi: 10.1177/0033354917726328.
3
Geographic and Grade-Level Disparities in Student Access to School-Based Physical Education and Physical Activity Opportunities Across 25 US States.美国25个州学生获得校内体育教育和体育活动机会的地理及年级差异
J Phys Act Health. 2024 Nov 27;22(2):235-244. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2024-0340. Print 2025 Feb 1.
4
Elementary school physical activity opportunities and physical fitness of students: A statewide cross-sectional study of schools.小学体育活动机会与学生体质:全州范围的学校横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 15;14(1):e0210444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210444. eCollection 2019.
5
Examining associations between school-level determinants and the implementation of physical activity opportunities.检查学校层面决定因素与体育活动机会实施之间的关联。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Feb 7;14(2):89-97. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad055.
6
The Whole-of-School Approach to Physical Activity: Findings From a National Sample of U.S. Secondary Students.学校整体体育活动方法:来自美国中学生全国样本的研究结果
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Sep;49(3):387-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
Elementary school staff perspectives on the implementation of physical activity approaches in practice: an exploratory sequential mixed methods study.小学工作人员对实践中实施身体活动方法的看法:一项探索性序贯混合方法研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 24;11:1193442. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1193442. eCollection 2023.
8
Associations between gender, school socioeconomic status, and cardiorespiratory fitness among elementary and middle school students.男女性别、学校社会经济地位与中小学生心肺功能适应性的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):1495. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09571-y.
9
Physical education and physical activity: results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2006.体育教育与体育活动:2006年学校健康政策与项目研究结果
J Sch Health. 2007 Oct;77(8):435-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00229.x.
10
Prevalence and Types of School-Based Out-of-School Time Programs at Elementary Schools and Implications for Student Nutrition and Physical Activity.中小学校外时间项目的流行程度和类型及其对学生营养和身体活动的影响。
J Sch Health. 2019 Jan;89(1):48-58. doi: 10.1111/josh.12710.

引用本文的文献

1
Using the R = MC heuristic to assess whole-of-school physical activity implementation in elementary schools: a cross-sectional study.运用R = MC启发式方法评估小学全校体育活动的实施情况:一项横断面研究
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Aug 23;22(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01815-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Observed and perceived benefits of providing physical activity opportunities in elementary schools: a qualitative study.小学提供体育活动机会的观察到的和感知到的益处:一项定性研究。
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Aug 31;5:1240382. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1240382. eCollection 2023.
2
Elementary school staff perspectives on the implementation of physical activity approaches in practice: an exploratory sequential mixed methods study.小学工作人员对实践中实施身体活动方法的看法:一项探索性序贯混合方法研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 24;11:1193442. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1193442. eCollection 2023.
3
Youth sport participation and physical activity in rural communities.农村社区青少年体育参与和身体活动
Arch Public Health. 2021 Apr 8;79(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00570-y.
4
Using a multi-stakeholder experience-based design process to co-develop the Creating Active Schools Framework.运用多方利益相关者基于经验的设计过程共同制定《创建积极学校框架》。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Feb 7;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-0917-z.
5
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.美国人体育活动指南。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 20;320(19):2020-2028. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14854.
6
School Segregation and Disparities in Urban, Suburban, and Rural Areas.城市、郊区和农村地区的学校隔离与差距
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2017 Nov;674(1):199-216. doi: 10.1177/0002716217733936. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
7
Disparities in Fitness and Physical Activity Among Children.儿童在健康状况和体育活动方面的差异。
WMJ. 2016 Nov;115(5):245-50.
8
Effects of physical activity on executive functions, attention and academic performance in preadolescent children: a meta-analysis.体育活动对青少年执行功能、注意力和学业成绩的影响:荟萃分析。
J Sci Med Sport. 2018 May;21(5):501-507. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.595. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
9
Effect of classroom-based physical activity interventions on academic and physical activity outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于课堂的体育活动干预对学业和体育活动结果的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Aug 25;14(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0569-9.
10
The Longitudinal Impact of NFL PLAY 60 Programming on Youth Aerobic Capacity and BMI.NFL PLAY 60 项目对青少年有氧适能和 BMI 的纵向影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Mar;52(3):311-323. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Dec 2.