Theoretical Biology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.
Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, Bari, Italy.
Biosystems. 2024 Oct;244:105288. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105288. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
This article proposes an evolutionary trajectory for the development of biological energy producing systems. Six main stages of energy producing system evolution are described, from early evolutionary pyrite-pulled mechanism through the Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA) to contemporary systems. We define the Last Pure Chemical Entity (LPCE) as the last completely non-enzymatic entity. LPCE could have had some life-like properties, but lacked genetic information carriers, thus showed greater instability and environmental dependence than LUCA. A double bubble model is proposed for compartmentalization and cellularization as a prerequisite to both highly efficient protein synthesis and transmembrane ion-gradient. The article finds that although LUCA predominantly functioned anaerobically, it was a non-exclusive anaerobe, and sulfur dominated metabolism preceded phosphate dominated one.
本文提出了生物能量产生系统发展的进化轨迹。描述了能量产生系统进化的六个主要阶段,从早期的进化硫铁矿拉动机制到最后的普遍共同祖先(LUCA)再到当代系统。我们将最后纯化学实体(LPCE)定义为最后一个完全非酶实体。LPCE 可能具有一些类似生命的特性,但缺乏遗传信息载体,因此比 LUCA 表现出更大的不稳定性和环境依赖性。提出了双泡模型作为高效蛋白质合成和跨膜离子梯度的前提进行分隔和细胞化。本文发现,尽管 LUCA 主要进行无氧功能,但它并非专性厌氧菌,且硫代谢先于磷代谢。