Enhancing BPPV Treatment Outcomes: A Comparative Study of the Epley Maneuver with and without the Dizzy-Fix Training Device.

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluates the effectiveness of combining the Epley Maneuver with the Dizzy-Fix Training Device in treating Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV), aiming to enhance treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, 50 patients diagnosed with posterior canal BPPV were allocated into two groups: one receiving the traditional Epley Maneuver and the other undergoing the Epley Maneuver supplemented with the Dizzy-Fix Training Device. Key measures included the proportion of symptom-free patients at one month, changes in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scores, the recurrence rate within one month, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The Dizzy-Fix group achieved a significantly higher symptom resolution rate by day 7 (90% vs. 60%) and reported greater patient satisfaction (4.5/5 vs. 3.8/5) compared to the Epley Maneuver alone group. Additionally, this group exhibited a more substantial decrease in DHI scores (from an average of 30 to 5) and a lower recurrence rate (10% vs. 40%) within the first month post-treatment.

CONCLUSION

Incorporating the Dizzy-Fix Training Device with the Epley Maneuver significantly improves the management of BPPV, evidenced by faster symptom resolution, enhanced patient satisfaction, and reduced symptom recurrence. These findings underscore the value of integrating real-time visual feedback technologies in vestibular rehabilitation, promising better patient outcomes, and advancing the quality of care in BPPV treatment.