Brito Mauro-Gustavo-Amaral, Pedrosa Marlus-da Silva, Bona Ariel-José, Rodrigues José-Augusto, do Amaral Flávia-Lucisano-Botelho, Peruzzo Daiane-Cristina, França Fabiana-Mantovani-Gomes
Christus Faculdade do Piauí, Piripiri, Piauí, Brazil.
São Leopoldo Mandic Institute and Dental Research Center, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2024 Jun 1;16(6):e700-e706. doi: 10.4317/jced.61598. eCollection 2024 Jun.
To evaluate the effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness and color changes of bis-acryl (Protemp 4 - 3M ESPE- St. Paul, USA; Structur 3 - Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany) and chemically activated acrylic materials (Duralay - Reliance, SP, Brazil).
Specimens (10 x 2 mm) thick were prepared for each material. The specimens were subjected to polishing and finishing procedures with aluminum oxide discs (Diamond Master - FGM, Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil) and spiral rubber disks (Sof-Lex - 3M ESPE, Germany). The control did not receive any polishing and finishing procedures. Surface roughness and color measurement values were obtained after the finishing and polishing procedures and immediately after 30 days of storage in water, coffee, and red wine. Data for each material were analyzed by One-Way ANOVA (<0.05).
The polishing with aluminum oxide discs was able to affect the initial surface roughness values of chemically activated acrylic material (<0.05). After immersion in staining solutions, lower ∆E values were only observed for the bis-acryl composite resins compared to the control group (<0.05).
The finishing and polishing systems influenced the surface roughness and color stability of the materials tested. The chemically activated acrylic resin showed lower surface roughness and higher color stability than the bis-acryl materials. Acrylic resin, bis-acryl resin, provisional restoration.
评估不同的修整和抛光系统对双丙烯酸树脂(美国明尼苏达州圣保罗市3M ESPE公司的Protemp 4;德国库克斯港Voco公司的Structur 3)和化学固化丙烯酸材料(巴西圣保罗Reliance公司的Duralay)表面粗糙度和颜色变化的影响。
为每种材料制备厚度为(10×2mm)的试样。使用氧化铝盘(巴西圣卡塔琳娜州茹安维尔市FGM公司的Diamond Master)和螺旋橡胶盘(德国3M ESPE公司的Sof-Lex)对试样进行抛光和修整处理。对照组不进行任何抛光和修整处理。在修整和抛光处理后以及在水、咖啡和红酒中储存30天后立即获取表面粗糙度和颜色测量值。每种材料的数据通过单因素方差分析进行分析(<0.05)。
使用氧化铝盘进行抛光能够影响化学固化丙烯酸材料的初始表面粗糙度值(<0.05)。与对照组相比,浸入染色溶液后,仅双丙烯酸复合树脂观察到较低的∆E值(<0.05)。
修整和抛光系统影响了所测试材料的表面粗糙度和颜色稳定性。化学固化丙烯酸树脂比双丙烯酸材料表现出更低的表面粗糙度和更高的颜色稳定性。丙烯酸树脂、双丙烯酸树脂、临时修复体。