Suppr超能文献

低程序性死亡配体1表达人群中的一线免疫检查点抑制剂

First-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in low programmed death-ligand 1-expressing population.

作者信息

Zhang Feiyang, Chen Guoming, Yin Yixin, Chen Xiaojiang, Nie Runcong, Chen Yingbo

机构信息

Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 26;15:1377690. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1377690. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Inhibitors of programmed cell death 1 (PD1) and its ligand (PDL1) have exhibited favorable long-term survival in many types of advanced-stage cancer and current approvals have to date been granted in certain tumour types irrespective of PD-L1 status. We extracted the following information: study sample size, trial period, cancer types, intervention of treatment, type of PD-L1 antibody, immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring method, number and percentage of PD-L1 < 1% population, and median follow- up time. PD-L1 expression was defined as percentage of number of PD-L1-stained tumor cells (TPS), area of tumor infiltrated by PD-L1-stained immune cells (IPS), number of PD-L1-stained cells (tumor cells, lymphocytes and macrophages; CPS). Different trials used distinct method to define low PD-L1 expression. The risk of bias of the included trials was assessed by using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs. Here, a total of 34 trials were included to extract individual patient data (IPD) to evaluate the survival benefit of first line PD1/PDL1 inhibitors vs. standard-of-care (SOC) in patients with PDL1 < 1%. In term of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy, OS (HR = 0.90, 0.81-1.01) and PFS (HR = 1.11, 0.97-1.27) between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor group and SOC group were comparable. In term of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combination therapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor group exhibited longer OS (median 19.5 months vs. 16.3 months; HR = 0.83, 0.79-0.88, < 0.001) and PFS than those of SOC group (median 8.11 months vs. 6.96 months; HR = 0.82, 0.77-0.87, < 0.001).Subgroup analysis showed that survival benefit was mainly observed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (HR = 0.74; HR = 0.69; < 0.001), small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) (HR = 0.58, < 0.001; HR = 0.55, = 0.030), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) (HR = 0.62, = 0.005; HR = 0.79, < 0.001), melanoma (HR = 0.53, < 0.001) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) (HR = 0.35, = 0.013). Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combinational therapy rather than monotherapy exhibit survival benefit in the low PD-L1 population in the first-line setting, and the survival benefit was mainly observed in specific tumor types.

摘要

程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD1)及其配体(PDL1)抑制剂已在多种晚期癌症中显示出良好的长期生存率,目前已在某些肿瘤类型中获批,无论PD-L1状态如何。我们提取了以下信息:研究样本量、试验周期、癌症类型、治疗干预、PD-L1抗体类型、免疫组织化学(IHC)评分方法、PD-L1<1%人群的数量和百分比,以及中位随访时间。PD-L1表达定义为PD-L1染色肿瘤细胞数量的百分比(TPS)、PD-L1染色免疫细胞浸润肿瘤的面积(IPS)、PD-L1染色细胞的数量(肿瘤细胞、淋巴细胞和巨噬细胞;CPS)。不同试验采用不同方法定义低PD-L1表达。采用Cochrane随机对照试验偏倚风险工具评估纳入试验的偏倚风险。在此,共纳入34项试验以提取个体患者数据(IPD),评估一线PD1 / PDL1抑制剂与标准治疗(SOC)相比,对PD-L1<1%患者的生存获益。就抗PD-1 / PD-L1单药治疗而言,PD-1 / PD-L1抑制剂组与SOC组之间的总生存期(HR = 0.90,0.81 - 1.01)和无进展生存期(HR = 1.11,0.97 - 1.27)相当。就抗PD-1 / PD-L1联合治疗而言,PD-1 / PD-L1抑制剂组的总生存期(中位19.5个月对16.3个月;HR = 0.83,0.79 - 0.88,<0.001)和无进展生存期均长于SOC组(中位8.11个月对6.96个月;HR = 0.82,0.77 - 0.87,<0.001)。亚组分析显示,生存获益主要见于非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)(HR = 0.74;HR = 0.69;<0.001)、小细胞肺癌(SCLC)(HR = 0.58,<0.001;HR = 0.55,= 0.030)、食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)(HR = 0.62,= 0.005;HR = 0.79,<0.001)、黑色素瘤(HR = 0.53,<0.001)和鼻咽癌(NPC)(HR = 0.35,= 0.013)。在一线治疗中,抗PD-1 / PD-L1联合治疗而非单药治疗在低PD-L1人群中显示出生存获益,且生存获益主要见于特定肿瘤类型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9542/11310016/03e6b577e605/fphar-15-1377690-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验