• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床环境中的有效汇报:一项测试基于证据的汇报应用程序对麻醉护理人员表现影响的试点研究。

Effective debriefings in the clinical setting: a pilot study to test the impact of an evidence based debriefing app on anesthesia care providers' performance.

作者信息

Seelandt Julia C, Schneider Jeannine, Kolbe Michaela, Grande Bastian

机构信息

Simulation Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Institute of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 26;11:1427061. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1427061. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1427061
PMID:39131087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11310000/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Debriefing enhances team learning, performance, and patient safety. Despite its benefits, it's underused. To address this, we developed an evidence-based debriefing app.

METHODS

This pilot study, conducted at a Swiss hospital, evaluated team performance during two anesthesia inductions using the Team Performance Scale (TPS). Following the first induction, teams engaged with the Zurich Debriefing App, with debriefing sessions meticulously recorded for subsequent evaluation. To mitigate bias, raters underwent comprehensive TPS training. The debriefings were analyzed through the DE-CODE framework. We utilized paired t-tests to examine performance improvements and linear regressions to assess the impact of reflective statements on performance, moderated by psychological safety.

RESULTS

Team performance significantly improved from the first to the second induction ( (9) = -2.512,  = 0.033). Senior physicians' ( = 8) reflective statements predicted post-assessment TPS scores (  = 0.732,  = 0.061), while consultants ( = 7) and nurse anesthetists ( = 10) did not. Interaction analysis revealed no moderation effects, but a main effect indicated the significance of senior physicians' reflective statements.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study confirms the efficacy of the evidence-based debriefing app in enhancing anesthesia team performance. Senior physicians' reflective statements positively influenced performance; however, no moderation effects were observed. The study highlights the potential of debriefing apps to streamline and enhance team debriefing processes, with significant implications for improving clinical practice and patient safety. Further research is needed to validate these findings on a larger scale and optimize the integration of debriefing into routine clinical practice.

摘要

背景

总结汇报可促进团队学习、提高绩效并提升患者安全。尽管有诸多益处,但它的使用并不充分。为解决这一问题,我们开发了一款基于证据的总结汇报应用程序。

方法

这项在瑞士一家医院进行的试点研究,使用团队绩效量表(TPS)评估了两次麻醉诱导过程中的团队表现。在第一次诱导后,团队使用苏黎世总结汇报应用程序,总结汇报会议被详细记录以供后续评估。为减少偏差,评估人员接受了全面的TPS培训。通过DE-CODE框架对总结汇报进行分析。我们使用配对t检验来检查绩效改进情况,并使用线性回归来评估反思性陈述对绩效的影响,以心理安全感作为调节变量。

结果

从第一次诱导到第二次诱导,团队绩效有显著提高((9) = -2.512, = 0.033)。高级医师( = 8)的反思性陈述可预测评估后的TPS分数( = 0.732, = 0.061),而顾问医师( = 7)和麻醉护士( = 10)的反思性陈述则不能。交互分析未发现调节效应,但主效应表明高级医师的反思性陈述具有重要意义。

结论

这项试点研究证实了基于证据的总结汇报应用程序在提高麻醉团队绩效方面的有效性。高级医师的反思性陈述对绩效有积极影响;然而,未观察到调节效应。该研究凸显了总结汇报应用程序在简化和加强团队总结汇报流程方面的潜力,对改善临床实践和患者安全具有重要意义。需要进一步开展研究以在更大规模上验证这些发现,并优化将总结汇报纳入常规临床实践的方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ed4/11310000/94ef6f9bce76/fmed-11-1427061-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ed4/11310000/019a74589cd0/fmed-11-1427061-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ed4/11310000/94ef6f9bce76/fmed-11-1427061-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ed4/11310000/019a74589cd0/fmed-11-1427061-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ed4/11310000/94ef6f9bce76/fmed-11-1427061-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effective debriefings in the clinical setting: a pilot study to test the impact of an evidence based debriefing app on anesthesia care providers' performance.临床环境中的有效汇报:一项测试基于证据的汇报应用程序对麻醉护理人员表现影响的试点研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 26;11:1427061. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1427061. eCollection 2024.
2
Improvement in student-led debriefing analysis after simulation-based team training using a revised teamwork assessment tool.使用经过修订的团队评估工具后,基于模拟的团队培训中学生主导的汇报分析得到改善。
Surgery. 2021 Dec;170(6):1659-1664. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.06.014. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
3
Debriefing the Interprofessional Team in Medical Simulation医学模拟中的跨专业团队汇报
4
Does a Written Tool to Guide Structured Debriefing Improve Discourse? Implications for Interprofessional Team Simulation.书面工具引导结构化讨论是否能提高讨论效果?对跨专业团队模拟的启示。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Nov;75(6):e240-e245. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
5
A comparison of rapid cycle deliberate practice and traditional reflective debriefing on interprofessional team performance.快速循环刻意练习与传统反思性汇报对跨专业团队绩效的比较。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Feb 7;24(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05101-1.
6
Quality with quantity? Evaluating interprofessional faculty prebriefs and debriefs for simulation training using video.质量与数量?使用视频评估模拟培训中的跨专业教员预讲和讲评。
Surgery. 2019 Jun;165(6):1069-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
7
TeamGAINS: a tool for structured debriefings for simulation-based team trainings.TeamGAINS:一种用于基于模拟的团队培训的结构化讨论的工具。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jul;22(7):541-53. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000917. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
8
9
Interprofessional team debriefings with or without an instructor after a simulated crisis scenario: An exploratory case study.模拟危机情景后有或没有教员参与的跨专业团队汇报:一项探索性案例研究
J Interprof Care. 2016 Nov;30(6):717-725. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1181616. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
10
Accuracy of Postresuscitation Team Debriefings in a Pediatric Emergency Department.儿科急诊科复苏后团队汇报的准确性
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;70(3):311-319. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.01.034. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Helping healthcare teams to debrief effectively: associations of debriefers' actions and participants' reflections during team debriefings.帮助医疗团队进行有效的反思:团队反思过程中反思者的行为与参与者的思考之间的关联。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Mar;32(3):160-172. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014393. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
2
DE-CODE: a coding scheme for assessing debriefing interactions.DE-CODE:一种用于评估汇报互动的编码方案。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018 Mar 23;4(2):51-58. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000233. eCollection 2018.
3
"A debriefer must be neutral" and other debriefing myths: a systemic inquiry-based qualitative study of taken-for-granted beliefs about clinical post-event debriefing.
“汇报者必须保持中立”及其他汇报误区:一项基于系统探究的关于临床事件后汇报中既定信念的定性研究
Adv Simul (Lond). 2021 Mar 4;6(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41077-021-00161-5.
4
Implementation of the 'TAKE STOCK' Hot Debrief Tool in the ED: a quality improvement project.在急诊科实施“TAKE STOCK”热点汇报工具:一项质量改进项目。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Aug;38(8):579-584. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208830. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
5
A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the after-action review (or debrief) and factors that influence its effectiveness.行动后回顾(或汇报)的有效性及其影响因素的荟萃分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Jul;106(7):1007-1032. doi: 10.1037/apl0000821. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
6
'Take 10 to talk about it': Use of a scripted, post-event debriefing tool in a neonatal intensive care unit.“花10分钟讨论一下”:在新生儿重症监护病房使用脚本化的事件后汇报工具。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Jul;56(7):1134-1139. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14856. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
7
Does team reflexivity impact teamwork and communication in interprofessional hospital-based healthcare teams? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.团队反思是否会影响跨专业医院医疗团队的团队合作和沟通?系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Aug;29(8):672-683. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009921. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
8
Laborious but Elaborate: The Benefits of Really Studying Team Dynamics.艰巨却精细:深入研究团队动态的益处
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 28;10:1478. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01478. eCollection 2019.
9
Smartphone applications for depression: a systematic literature review and a survey of health care professionals' attitudes towards their use in clinical practice.智能手机应用程序治疗抑郁症:一项系统文献综述以及对临床实践中使用此类应用的卫生保健专业人员态度的调查。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Mar;270(2):139-152. doi: 10.1007/s00406-018-0974-3. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
10
Resilience From a Stakeholder Perspective: The Role of Next of Kin in Cancer Care.从利益相关者的角度看韧性:癌症护理中近亲的作用。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Sep;16(3):e205-e210. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000532.