Suppr超能文献

儿科急诊科复苏后团队汇报的准确性

Accuracy of Postresuscitation Team Debriefings in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

作者信息

Mullan Paul C, Cochrane Niall H, Chamberlain James M, Burd Randall S, Brown Fawn D, Zinns Lauren E, Crandall Kristen M, O'Connell Karen J

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA; Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC; George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.

Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;70(3):311-319. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.01.034. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Guideline committees recommend postresuscitation debriefings to improve performance. "Hot" postresuscitation debriefings occur immediately after the event and rely on team recall. We assessed the ability of resuscitation teams to recall their performance in team-based, hot debriefings in a pediatric emergency department (ED), using video review as the criterion standard. We hypothesized that debriefing accuracy will improve during the course of the study.

METHODS

Resuscitation physician and nurse leaders cofacilitated debriefings after ED resuscitations involving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or intubation. Debriefing teams recorded their self-assessments of clinical performance measures with standardized debriefing forms. The debriefing form data were compared with actual performance measured by video review at 2 pediatric EDs over 22 months. CPR performance measures included time to automated external defibrillator pad placement, epinephrine administration timing, and compression pause timing. Intubation measures included occurrences of oxygen desaturation, number of intubation attempts, and use of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring.

RESULTS

We analyzed 100 resuscitations (14 cardiac arrests, 22 cardiac arrests with intubation, and 64 intubations). The accuracy of debriefing answers was 87%, increasing from 83% to 91% between the first and second halves of the study period (7.7% difference; 95% confidence interval 0.2% to 15%). Debriefings that acknowledged an error in certain performance measures (ie, automated external defibrillator pad placement delay, multiple intubation attempts, and occurrence of oxygen desaturation) had significantly worse performance in those specific measures on video review.

CONCLUSION

Teams in postresuscitation debriefings had a higher degree of debriefing answer accuracy in the final 50 debriefings than in the first 50. Teams also distinguished various degrees of resuscitation performance.

摘要

研究目的

指南委员会推荐复苏后汇报以提高表现。“热”复苏后汇报在事件发生后立即进行,依赖团队回忆。我们以视频回顾作为标准对照,评估了儿科急诊科复苏团队在基于团队的热汇报中回忆其表现的能力。我们假设在研究过程中汇报准确性将会提高。

方法

复苏医生和护士负责人在急诊科涉及心肺复苏(CPR)或插管的复苏后共同主持汇报。汇报团队用标准化汇报表格记录他们对临床表现指标的自我评估。在22个月内,将两个儿科急诊科的汇报表格数据与通过视频回顾测得的实际表现进行比较。CPR表现指标包括自动体外除颤器电极片放置时间、肾上腺素给药时间和按压中断时间。插管指标包括氧饱和度下降情况、插管尝试次数和呼气末二氧化碳监测的使用。

结果

我们分析了100次复苏(14次心脏骤停、22次伴有插管的心脏骤停和64次插管)。汇报答案的准确率为87%,在研究期的前半段和后半段之间从83%提高到了91%(差异7.7%;95%置信区间0.2%至15%)。在某些表现指标(即自动体外除颤器电极片放置延迟、多次插管尝试和氧饱和度下降情况)中承认存在错误的汇报,在视频回顾中的那些特定指标上表现明显更差。

结论

复苏后汇报中的团队在最后50次汇报中的汇报答案准确率高于前50次。团队也区分了不同程度的复苏表现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验