Gravett Michael G, Menon Ramkumar, Tribe Rachel M, Hezelgrave Natasha L, Kacerovsky Marian, Soma-Pillay Priya, Jacobsson Bo, McElrath Thomas F
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, United States.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 26;11:1414428. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1414428. eCollection 2024.
Preterm birth remains an important global problem, and an important contributor to under-5 mortality. Reducing spontaneous preterm birth rates at the global level will require the early identification of patients at risk of preterm delivery in order to allow the initiation of appropriate prophylactic management strategies. Ideally these strategies target the underlying pathophysiologic causes of preterm labor. Prevention, however, becomes problematic as the causes of preterm birth are multifactorial and vary by gestational age, ethnicity, and social context. Unfortunately, current screening and diagnostic tests are non-specific, with only moderate clinical risk prediction, relying on the detection of downstream markers of the common end-stage pathway rather than identifying upstream pathway-specific pathophysiology that would help the provider initiate targeted interventions. As a result, the available management options (including cervical cerclage and vaginal progesterone) are used empirically with, at best, ambiguous results in clinical trials. Furthermore, the available screening tests have only modest clinical risk prediction, and fail to identify most patients who will have a preterm birth. Clearly defining preterm birth phenotypes and the biologic pathways leading to preterm birth is key to providing targeted, biomolecular pathway-specific interventions, ideally initiated in early pregnancy Pathway specific biomarker discovery, together with management strategies based on early, mid-, and-late trimester specific markers is integral to this process, which must be addressed in a systematic way through rigorously planned biomarker trials.
早产仍然是一个重要的全球性问题,也是5岁以下儿童死亡的一个重要原因。要在全球范围内降低自然早产率,就需要尽早识别有早产风险的患者,以便能够启动适当的预防性管理策略。理想情况下,这些策略应针对早产的潜在病理生理原因。然而,由于早产的原因是多因素的,并且因孕周、种族和社会背景而异,预防工作变得困难重重。不幸的是,目前的筛查和诊断测试缺乏特异性,临床风险预测能力一般,依赖于检测常见终末通路的下游标志物,而不是识别上游通路特异性的病理生理学,这有助于医疗人员启动有针对性的干预措施。因此,现有的管理选项(包括宫颈环扎术和阴道用黄体酮)都是凭经验使用,在临床试验中充其量只能得到不明确的结果。此外,现有的筛查测试临床风险预测能力有限,无法识别出大多数将会早产的患者。明确定义早产表型以及导致早产的生物学途径,是提供有针对性的、基于生物分子途径的特异性干预措施的关键,理想情况下应在妊娠早期启动。发现途径特异性生物标志物,以及基于孕早期、中期和晚期特定标志物的管理策略,是这一过程不可或缺的一部分,必须通过严格规划的生物标志物试验以系统的方式加以解决。