Suppr超能文献

组织学与分子诊断肺排斥反应的治疗反应。

Treatment Responses in Histologic Versus Molecular Diagnoses of Lung Rejection.

机构信息

Prague Lung Transplant Program, Department of Pneumology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia.

Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Transpl Int. 2024 Jul 26;37:12847. doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.12847. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Histologic evaluation of allograft biopsies after lung transplantation has several limitations, suggesting that molecular assessment using tissue transcriptomics could improve biopsy interpretation. This single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluated discrepancies between the histology of transbronchial biopsies (TBBs) with no rejection (NR) and T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) by molecular diagnosis. The accuracy of diagnosis was assessed based on response to treatment. 54 TBBs from Prague Lung Transplant Program obtained between December 2015 and January 2020 were included. Patients with acute cellular rejection (ACR) grade ≥ 1 by histology received anti-rejection treatment. Response to therapy was defined as an increase in FEV1 of ≥ 10% 4 weeks post-biopsy compared to the pre-biopsy value. Among the 54 analyzed TBBs, 25 (46%) were concordant with histology, while 29 (54%) showed discrepancies. ACR grade 0 was found in 12 TBBs (22%) and grade A1 ≥ 1 in 42 TBBs (78%). Treatment response was present in 14% in the NR group and in 50% in the TCMR group ( = 0.024). Our findings suggest that low-grade acute cellular rejection is less likely to be associated with molecular TCMR, which might better identify lung transplant recipients who benefit from therapy.

摘要

肺移植后同种异体移植物活检的组织学评估存在多种局限性,这表明使用组织转录组学进行分子评估可以改善活检的解读。这项单中心回顾性队列研究评估了经支气管镜活检(TBB)中无排斥反应(NR)和 T 细胞介导排斥反应(TCMR)的组织学与分子诊断之间的差异。诊断的准确性是基于治疗反应来评估的。纳入了布拉格肺移植项目在 2015 年 12 月至 2020 年 1 月期间获得的 54 份 TBB。组织学上表现为急性细胞排斥反应(ACR)≥1 级的患者接受了抗排斥治疗。治疗反应定义为活检后 4 周与活检前相比 FEV1 增加≥10%。在分析的 54 份 TBB 中,25 份(46%)与组织学一致,而 29 份(54%)存在差异。12 份 TBB 表现为 ACR 0 级(22%),42 份 TBB 表现为 A1 级≥1 级(78%)。NR 组的治疗反应率为 14%,而 TCMR 组为 50%(=0.024)。我们的研究结果表明,低级别急性细胞排斥反应不太可能与分子 TCMR 相关,这可能更好地识别出受益于治疗的肺移植受者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/254c/11310027/4f2e67c2f9a0/ti-37-12847-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验