• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左主干冠状动脉疾病治疗后的性别特异性临床结局。一项NOBLE子研究。

Sex-Specific Clinical Outcomes After Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. A NOBLE Substudy.

作者信息

McEntegart Margaret B, Holm Niels R, Lindsay Martin M, Oldroyd Keith G, Mäkikallio Timo, Hildick-Smith David, Erglis Andrejs, Kellerth Thomas, Davidavicius Giedrius, Menown Ian B A, Mogensen Lone J H, Nielsen Per H, Steigen Terje K, Endresen Petter C, Spence Mark S, Graham Alastair N J, Stradins Peteris, Anttila Vesa, Thuesen Leif, Christiansen Evald H

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 May 30;1(4):100338. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100338. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100338
PMID:39131931
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11308852/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While female sex has been associated with worse outcomes following coronary revascularization, previous analyses in left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease have been conflicting. In addition, a signal that increased mortality may be specific to women treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) requires further investigation.

METHODS

Nordic-Baltic-British left main revascularization study (NOBLE) was a randomized trial comparing PCI to coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in patients with LMCA disease. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, nonprocedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke (major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events [MACCE]). We report the 5-year sex-specific outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 1184 patients analyzed, 256 (22%) were female and 928 (78%) were male. There were no significant within-sex differences in baseline characteristics, disease location, or complexity between those treated with PCI and those with CABG. The 5-year MACCE rates were 29% and 15% in females and 28% and 20% in males treated with PCI and CABG, respectively. Within both sexes, there was an increased risk of MACCE with PCI compared with CABG, but no difference in all-cause mortality. On multivariate analysis, female sex was not an independent predictor of MACCE.

CONCLUSIONS

Following the treatment of LMCA disease, long-term outcomes favored CABG over PCI in both sexes. Importantly, there was no difference in all-cause mortality in females or males at 5 ​years.

摘要

背景

虽然女性性别与冠状动脉血运重建术后较差的预后相关,但先前对左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)疾病的分析结果存在矛盾。此外,有迹象表明死亡率增加可能是接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的女性所特有的,这需要进一步研究。

方法

北欧-波罗的海-英国左主干血运重建研究(NOBLE)是一项随机试验,比较了LMCA疾病患者接受PCI与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的疗效。主要终点是全因死亡率、非手术性心肌梗死、再次血运重建和中风的综合指标(主要不良心血管和脑血管事件[MACCE])。我们报告了5年的性别特异性结果。

结果

在分析的1184例患者中,256例(22%)为女性,928例(78%)为男性。接受PCI和CABG治疗的患者在基线特征、疾病部位或复杂性方面,性别内无显著差异。接受PCI和CABG治疗的女性5年MACCE发生率分别为29%和15%,男性分别为28%和20%。在两性中,与CABG相比,PCI治疗的MACCE风险增加,但全因死亡率无差异。多变量分析显示,女性性别不是MACCE的独立预测因素。

结论

治疗LMCA疾病后,两性的长期预后均显示CABG优于PCI。重要的是,5年时女性和男性的全因死亡率无差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bb/11308852/5377663e6d0d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bb/11308852/33c446bb36e1/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bb/11308852/f5faae624b51/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bb/11308852/9820d33de3e6/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bb/11308852/a46dbef8edfc/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bb/11308852/5377663e6d0d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bb/11308852/33c446bb36e1/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bb/11308852/f5faae624b51/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bb/11308852/9820d33de3e6/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bb/11308852/a46dbef8edfc/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bb/11308852/5377663e6d0d/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex-Specific Clinical Outcomes After Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. A NOBLE Substudy.左主干冠状动脉疾病治疗后的性别特异性临床结局。一项NOBLE子研究。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 May 30;1(4):100338. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100338. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.
2
Age-Stratified Outcome in Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A NOBLE Trial Substudy.左主干冠状动脉狭窄治疗的年龄分层结果:NOBLE 试验亚研究。
Cardiology. 2021;146(4):409-418. doi: 10.1159/000515376. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
3
Prognostic Value of Sex After Revascularization for Left Main Coronary Disease: Extended PRECOMBAT Study.左主干冠状动脉疾病血运重建术后性别的预后价值:PRECOMBAT扩展研究
JACC Asia. 2021 Nov 9;2(1):19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.08.009. eCollection 2022 Feb.
4
Outcomes After Coronary Stenting or Bypass Surgery for Men and Women With Unprotected Left Main Disease: The EXCEL Trial.男性和女性无保护左主干病变患者行冠状动脉支架置入术或旁路手术的结果:EXCEL 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 9;11(13):1234-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.051.
5
Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干狭窄:NOBLE 随机非劣效性试验的 5 年更新结果。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):191-199. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32972-1. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
6
Impact of 3-dimensional bifurcation angle on 5-year outcome of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease: a substudy of the SYNTAX trial (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery).三维分叉角度对左主干冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 5 年预后的影响:SYNTAX 试验(紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏搭桥术的联合治疗)的一项亚组研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1250-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.009.
7
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
8
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干狭窄患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;2(10):1079-1088. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2895.
9
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对三血管病变患者的比较:SYNTAX 试验的最终五年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 21;35(40):2821-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu213. Epub 2014 May 21.
10
Treatment of complex coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes: 5-year results comparing outcomes of bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in the SYNTAX trial.糖尿病患者复杂冠状动脉疾病的治疗:SYNTAX 试验比较旁路手术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 5 年结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 May;43(5):1006-13. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt017. Epub 2013 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and angiographic profile of left main coronary artery disease in patients with chronic coronary syndrome: a retrospective study.慢性冠状动脉综合征患者左主干冠状动脉疾病的临床和血管造影特征:一项回顾性研究。
Egypt Heart J. 2025 Feb 3;77(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s43044-025-00615-5.
2
Outcomes of Complex Percutaneous Cardiac Interventions in Women.女性复杂经皮心脏介入治疗的结果
US Cardiol. 2023 Nov 23;17:e18. doi: 10.15420/usc.2022.21. eCollection 2023.
3
Position Statement on Ischemic Heart Disease - Women-Centered Health Care - 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: an individual patient data meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的比较:一项个体患者数据分析荟萃研究。
Lancet. 2021 Dec 18;398(10318):2247-2257. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02334-5. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
2
Intravascular ultrasound to guide left main stem intervention: a NOBLE trial substudy.血管内超声指导左主干介入治疗:NOBLE 试验子研究。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Jun 25;16(3):201-209. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01003.
3
Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial.
《缺血性心脏病以女性为中心的医疗保健——2023年立场声明》
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Aug 4;120(7):e20230303. doi: 10.36660/abc.20230303.
4
Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2022: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials.《临床心脏病学进展 2022:重点临床试验综述》。
Adv Ther. 2023 Jun;40(6):2595-2625. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02502-4. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干狭窄:NOBLE 随机非劣效性试验的 5 年更新结果。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):191-199. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32972-1. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
4
Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease.左主干冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术后 5 年的结果。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 7;381(19):1820-1830. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1909406. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
5
Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft in left main coronary artery disease: a comprehensive meta-analysis of adjusted observational studies and randomized controlled trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病:调整后的观察性研究和随机对照试验的综合荟萃分析。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2018 Oct;19(10):554-563. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000703.
6
Outcomes After Coronary Stenting or Bypass Surgery for Men and Women With Unprotected Left Main Disease: The EXCEL Trial.男性和女性无保护左主干病变患者行冠状动脉支架置入术或旁路手术的结果:EXCEL 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 9;11(13):1234-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.051.
7
Clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary revascularization vs coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials and 4,686 patients.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉血运重建与冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床结局:6项随机试验和4686例患者的荟萃分析
Am Heart J. 2017 Aug;190:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 18.
8
ESC working group position paper on myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries.欧洲心脏病学会工作组关于非阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死的立场文件。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Jan 14;38(3):143-153. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw149.
9
Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干狭窄(NOBLE):一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2743-2752. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32052-9. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
10
Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.依维莫司洗脱支架或旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2223-2235. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610227. Epub 2016 Oct 31.