Peroneus brevis split rupture is underreported on magnetic resonance imaging of the ankle in patients with chronic lateral ankle pain.

INTRODUCTION

Peroneus brevis split rupture poses a diagnostic challenge, often requiring magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), yet splits are missed in initial radiological reports. However, the frequency of reported peroneus brevis split rupture in clinical MRI examinations is unknown.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate underreporting frequency of peroneus brevis split rupture in patients with lateral ankle pain.

METHODS

We re-evaluated 143 consecutive MRI examinations of the ankle joint, conducted in 2021 in our region, for patients experiencing ankle pain persisting for more than 8 months. Two musculoskeletal radiologists, with 12 and 8 years of experience respectively, assessed the presence of peroneus brevis split rupture. Patients with recent ankle trauma, fractures, postoperative changes, or MRI artifacts were excluded. The radiologists evaluated each MRI for incomplete or complete peroneus brevis split rupture. The consensus between the raters was used as the reference standard. Additionally, raters reviewed the original clinical radiological reports to determine if the presence of peroneus brevis split rupture was noted. Agreement between raters' assessments, consensus, and initial reports was evaluated using Gwet's AC1 coefficients.

RESULTS

Initial radiological reports indicated 23 cases (52.3 %) of peroneus brevis split rupture, meaning 21 cases (47.7 %) were underreported. The Gwet's AC1 coefficients showed that the agreement between raters and initial reports was 0.401 (standard error 0.070), 95 % CI (0.261, 0.541), p<.001, while the agreement between raters in the study was 0.716 (standard error 0.082), 95 % CI (0.551, 0.881), p<.001.

CONCLUSION

Peroneus brevis split rupture is underreported on MRI scans of patients with lateral ankle pain.