• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉血管内碎石术引入后经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间钙修饰的应用

Use of Calcium Modification During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Introduction of Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy.

作者信息

Butala Neel M, Waldo Stephen W, Secemsky Eric A, Kennedy Kevin F, Spertus John A, Rymer Jennifer A, Rao Sunil V, Messenger John C, Yeh Robert W

机构信息

Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado.

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.

出版信息

J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Jan 22;3(2):101254. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101254. eCollection 2024 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101254
PMID:39132220
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11308754/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Calcified coronary lesions are a challenge for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel calcium modification technology approved for commercial use in February 2021, but little is known about its uptake in US clinical practice.

METHODS

We described trends in use of calcium modification strategies, variation in use across hospitals, and predictors of calcium modification and IVL use in PCI. We included National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry patients who underwent PCI between April 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022. We examined trends and hospital variation in calcium modification and IVL use. We used multivariate hierarchical logistic regression to identify predictors of calcium modification and IVL use at hospitals in 2022.

RESULTS

Of 2,733,494 PCIs across 1676 hospitals over 4.75 years, 11.4% were performed with calcium modification. Coronary IVL use increased rapidly from 0% of PCIs in Q4 2020 to 7.8% of PCIs in Q4 2022, which was accompanied by an overall increase in use of all calcium modification strategies (11.1%-16.0%) during this period with a slight corresponding decrease in coronary atherectomy use (5.4%-4.4%). In 2022, there was wide variation in IVL use across hospitals (median, 3.86%; IQR, 0%-8.19%), with IVL being the most common calcium modification strategy in 48% of hospitals. The treating hospital was the strongest predictor of calcium modification (median odds ratio [OR], 2.49; 95% CI, 2.40-2.57) and IVL use (median OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 2.74-3.04).

CONCLUSIONS

IVL has rapidly changed the landscape of calcium modification use for PCI, although there remains wide variation across hospitals.

摘要

背景

钙化性冠状动脉病变是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)面临的一项挑战。冠状动脉血管内碎石术(IVL)是一项于2021年2月获批投入商业使用的新型钙修饰技术,但对于其在美国临床实践中的应用情况知之甚少。

方法

我们描述了钙修饰策略的使用趋势、各医院使用情况的差异,以及PCI中钙修饰和IVL使用的预测因素。我们纳入了2018年4月1日至2022年12月31日期间接受PCI的国家心血管数据注册中心CathPCI注册患者。我们研究了钙修饰和IVL使用的趋势及医院差异。我们使用多变量分层逻辑回归来确定2022年各医院钙修饰和IVL使用的预测因素。

结果

在4.75年的时间里,1676家医院共进行了2,733,494例PCI,其中11.4%的手术采用了钙修饰。冠状动脉IVL的使用从2020年第四季度PCI的0%迅速增加到2022年第四季度PCI的7.8%,在此期间,所有钙修饰策略的使用总体增加(从11.1%增至16.0%),而冠状动脉旋切术的使用相应略有下降(从5.4%降至4.4%)。2022年,各医院IVL的使用差异很大(中位数为3.86%;四分位间距为0% - 8.19%),在48%的医院中,IVL是最常用的钙修饰策略。治疗医院是钙修饰(中位数优势比[OR]为2.49;95%置信区间为2.40 - 2.57)和IVL使用(中位数OR为2.89;95%置信区间为2.74 - 3.04)的最强预测因素。

结论

尽管各医院之间仍存在很大差异,但IVL已迅速改变了PCI中钙修饰的使用格局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7af0/11308754/0309707eacea/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7af0/11308754/6507307ceaed/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7af0/11308754/d27a34340874/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7af0/11308754/bb88435dad99/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7af0/11308754/0036bd7167d3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7af0/11308754/0309707eacea/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7af0/11308754/6507307ceaed/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7af0/11308754/d27a34340874/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7af0/11308754/bb88435dad99/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7af0/11308754/0036bd7167d3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7af0/11308754/0309707eacea/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of Calcium Modification During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Introduction of Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy.冠状动脉血管内碎石术引入后经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间钙修饰的应用
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Jan 22;3(2):101254. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101254. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Coronary intravascular lithotripsy in contemporary practice: challenges and opportunities in coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉腔内碎石术在当代实践中的应用:冠状动脉介入治疗中的挑战与机遇。
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Jan-Dec;18:17539447241263444. doi: 10.1177/17539447241263444.
3
Contemporary Trends and Outcomes of Intravascular Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From BMC2.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中血管内碎石术的当代趋势和结果:来自 BMC2 的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Aug 12;17(15):1811-1821. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.04.039. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
4
Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy for Calcified Coronary Lesions: First Real-World Experience.用于钙化冠状动脉病变的冲击波血管内碎石术:首次真实世界经验。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Mar;31(3):46-48. doi: 10.25270/jic/19.00048. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
5
Intravascular lithotripsy compared to rotational atherectomy for the treatment of calcified distal left main coronary artery disease: A single center experience.血管内碎石术与旋磨术治疗钙化的左主干冠状动脉远端病变的比较:单中心经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov;102(6):997-1003. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30855. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
6
Physiological and angiographic outcomes of PCI in calcified lesions after rotational atherectomy or intravascular lithotripsy.旋磨或腔内碎石术后钙化病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的生理和血管造影结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Apr 1;352:27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.01.066. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
7
Comparative study of costs and resource utilization of rotational atherectomy versus intravascular lithotripsy for percutaneous coronary intervention.旋磨术与血管内碎石术治疗经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的成本和资源利用比较研究。
Minerva Cardiol Angiol. 2022 Jun;70(3):332-340. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5683.21.05681-7. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
8
Complementary Utility of Intravascular Lithotripsy With Atherectomy for Severely Calcified Coronary Stenoses in Contemporary Practice.当代实践中血管内碎石术联合旋切术治疗严重钙化冠状动脉狭窄的互补效用
J Invasive Cardiol. 2023 Jan;35(1):E46-E54. doi: 10.25270/jic/22.00310. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
9
Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of Intravascular Lithotripsy Use During Calcified Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.钙化左主干冠状动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中血管内碎石术应用的回顾性多中心分析
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Nov 10;3(2):101213. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101213. eCollection 2024 Feb.
10
Combined Coronary Orbital Atherectomy and Intravascular Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Stenoses: The First Case Series.联合冠状动脉旋磨术和血管内冲击波碎石术治疗严重钙化性冠状动脉狭窄:首例病例系列报道
J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 Mar;34(3):E210-E217. doi: 10.25270/jic/21.00106. Epub 2022 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention with intravascular lithotripsy for severe calcified lesions.血管内超声引导下血管内碎石术用于严重钙化病变的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效和安全性。
Heart Vessels. 2025 Aug 16. doi: 10.1007/s00380-025-02596-6.
2
Coronary intravascular lithotripsy: the tombstone of coronary calcium.冠状动脉内碎石术:冠状动脉钙化的终结
Future Cardiol. 2024;20(13):669-670. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2024.2411191. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

本文引用的文献

1
2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021 年 ACC/AHA/SCAI 冠状动脉血运重建指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 18;79(2):197-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.005. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
2
Comparing Baseline Data From Registries With Trials: Evidence From the CathPCI Registry and DAPT Study.比较来自注册登记处与试验的基线数据:来自心脏导管介入注册登记处和双联抗血小板治疗研究的证据。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 28;14(12):1386-1388. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.065.
3
Principles of Intravascular Lithotripsy for Calcific Plaque Modification.
血管内碎石术治疗钙化斑块修饰的原则。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 28;14(12):1275-1292. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.036.
4
Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Artery Disease.血管内碎石术治疗严重钙化冠状动脉疾病。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 1;76(22):2635-2646. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.603. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
5
Coronary Calcification and Long-Term Outcomes According to Drug-Eluting Stent Generation.冠状动脉钙化与药物洗脱支架世代与长期预后。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 22;13(12):1417-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.053.
6
Trends in Usage and Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Atherectomy: A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry.冠状动脉旋磨术使用趋势及临床结果:来自全国心血管数据注册中心经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)注册研究的报告。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb;13(2):e008239. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008239. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
7
High-Speed Rotational Atherectomy Versus Modified Balloons Prior to Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions.高速旋磨术与改良球囊在药物洗脱支架置入治疗严重钙化冠状动脉病变前的应用比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct;11(10):e007415. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007415.
8
Temporal Trends in Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program.经美国退伍军人事务部临床评估、报告和追踪项目观察到的冠状动脉造影及经皮冠状动脉介入术的时间趋势。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 May 14;11(9):879-888. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.02.035.
9
Orbital atherectomy for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: 3-year results of the pivotal ORBIT II trial.用于治疗初发、严重钙化冠状动脉病变的轨道旋切术:关键的ORBIT II试验3年结果
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 Jun;18(4):261-264. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
10
Temporal Trends in the Risk Profile of Patients Undergoing Outpatient Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's CathPCI Registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)门诊患者风险特征的时间趋势:来自国家心血管数据注册中心的 CathPCI 注册研究报告。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar;9(3):e003070. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003070.