• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性完全闭塞性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的穿刺部位选择与预后:来自退伍军人事务部CART项目的见解

Access Site Selection and Outcomes for Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Insights from the VA CART Program.

作者信息

Chakravartti Jaidip, Feser William J, Plomondon Mary E, Valle Javier A, Rao Sunil V, Gutierrez J Antonio, Grunwald Gary K, Gunzburger Elise, Swaminathan Rajesh V

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine.

Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado.

出版信息

J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Aug 24;1(6):100440. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100440. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100440
PMID:39132361
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11308032/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been increasing use of transradial access (TRA) for non-chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There are limited data on TRA for CTO PCI. The objectives of this study were to assess the temporal trends in the use of TRA versus transfemoral access (TFA), identify procedural and lesion characteristics associated with the use of TRA and TFA, and evaluate the association of access site with procedural complications and technical success among veterans undergoing attempted CTO PCI.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of veteran patients who underwent attempted CTO PCI to compare outcomes between TRA and TFA. Patients who had undergone attempted PCI of at least 1 CTO were included. Propensity score matching was used to evaluate the composite primary outcome of major procedural complications, in-hospital bleeding, or 30-day mortality and the secondary outcome of procedural success.

RESULTS

In total, 4609 patients underwent attempted CTO PCI during 2010-2017. Rates of TRA for CTO PCI increased significantly, from 7% in 2010 to 38% in 2017 ( < .01). A greater percentage of CTO lesions in the TFA group was calcified and >20.0 mm in length. TRA was not associated with a reduction in the composite primary outcome (TRA 3.3% vs TFA 4.0%, = .47) or procedural success (TRA 66.6% vs TFA 65.7%, = .74) compared with TFA.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis of patients who underwent attempted CTO PCI, the proportion of TRA for CTO PCI has increased over time but was not associated with a greater safety or procedural success than TFA.

摘要

背景

经桡动脉入路(TRA)在非慢性完全闭塞(CTO)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中的应用日益增多。关于CTO PCI使用TRA的数据有限。本研究的目的是评估TRA与经股动脉入路(TFA)使用的时间趋势,确定与TRA和TFA使用相关的手术和病变特征,并评估在接受CTO PCI尝试的退伍军人中,入路部位与手术并发症和技术成功之间的关联。

方法

我们对接受CTO PCI尝试的退伍军人患者进行了回顾性分析,以比较TRA和TFA之间的结果。纳入至少1次CTO PCI尝试的患者。倾向评分匹配用于评估主要手术并发症、院内出血或30天死亡率的复合主要结局以及手术成功的次要结局。

结果

2010年至2017年期间,共有4609例患者接受了CTO PCI尝试。CTO PCI的TRA使用率显著增加,从2010年的7%增至2017年的38%(P<0.01)。TFA组中更大比例的CTO病变有钙化且长度>20.0 mm。与TFA相比,TRA与复合主要结局的降低(TRA为3.3% vs TFA为4.0%,P = 0.47)或手术成功(TRA为66.6% vs TFA为65.7%,P = 0.74)无关。

结论

在这项对接受CTO PCI尝试患者的回顾性分析中,CTO PCI的TRA比例随时间增加,但与TFA相比,其安全性或手术成功率并未更高。

相似文献

1
Access Site Selection and Outcomes for Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Insights from the VA CART Program.慢性完全闭塞性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的穿刺部位选择与预后:来自退伍军人事务部CART项目的见解
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Aug 24;1(6):100440. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100440. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
2
Femoral or Radial Approach in Treatment of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.股动脉或桡动脉入路治疗冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞:一项随机临床试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Apr 25;15(8):823-830. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.02.012.
3
Transradial and Transfemoral Access for Retrograde Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Comparison of the Clinical Features and Prognostic Implications.经桡动脉和经股动脉途径用于逆向慢性完全闭塞性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:临床特征与预后意义的比较
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Aug 26;17:3689-3698. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S479408. eCollection 2024.
4
Meta-Analysis on the Safety and Efficacy of Transradial Approach in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经桡动脉途径在慢性完全闭塞性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的安全性和有效性的Meta分析
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Apr 1;192:245-254. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.01.005. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
5
Comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approach in treatment of chronic total occlusions with similar lesion characteristics.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径治疗具有相似病变特征的慢性完全闭塞病变的比较。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2018 May;19(5):319-325. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2018.02779.
6
Radial versus femoral access for left main percutaneous coronary intervention: An analysis from the Veterans Affairs Clinical, Reporting, and Tracking Program.经股动脉与桡动脉入路行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干病变:来自退伍军人事务部临床、报告和跟踪项目的分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(2):480-488. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30024. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
7
Left main percutaneous coronary intervention-Radial versus femoral access: A systematic analysis.左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗-桡动脉与股动脉入路:系统分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 1;95(7):E201-E213. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28451. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
8
Procedural Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Chronic Total Occlusions Via the Radial Approach: Insights From an International Chronic Total Occlusion Registry.经桡动脉入路行慢性完全闭塞病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的操作结果:来自国际慢性完全闭塞病变注册研究的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 25;12(4):346-358. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.019.
9
Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径用于无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):790-798. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.10.025. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
10
Randomized Comparison Between Radial and Femoral Large-Bore Access for Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.随机比较桡动脉和股动脉大腔径入路在复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 28;14(12):1293-1303. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.041. Epub 2021 May 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Access Selection for Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Complication Management.
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2021 Jan;10(1):109-120. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2020.09.009.
2
Radial Versus Femoral Access in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中慢性完全闭塞病变经桡动脉与股动脉入路的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun;12(6):e007778. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007778. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
3
Procedural Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Chronic Total Occlusions Via the Radial Approach: Insights From an International Chronic Total Occlusion Registry.经桡动脉入路行慢性完全闭塞病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的操作结果:来自国际慢性完全闭塞病变注册研究的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 25;12(4):346-358. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.019.
4
Technical Considerations in Transradial Unprotected Left Main Stem Rotational Atherectomy-Assisted and IVUS-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the 7.5F Eaucath Sheathless Guiding Catheter System.使用7.5F Eaucath无鞘引导导管系统进行经桡动脉非保护左主干旋磨术辅助及血管内超声引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的技术考量
Cardiol Res. 2018 Aug;9(4):258-263. doi: 10.14740/cr740w. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
5
Comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approach in treatment of chronic total occlusions with similar lesion characteristics.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径治疗具有相似病变特征的慢性完全闭塞病变的比较。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2018 May;19(5):319-325. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2018.02779.
6
Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for left main bifurcation lesions using 7.5-Fr sheathless guide catheter.使用7.5F无鞘引导导管行经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗左主干分叉病变
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 May;97(18):e0678. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010678.
7
The Hybrid Approach to Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Update From the PROGRESS CTO Registry.Hybrid 策略在慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用:来自 PROGRESS CTO 注册研究的更新。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 23;11(14):1325-1335. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.02.036. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
8
Length of stay following percutaneous coronary intervention: An expert consensus document update from the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的住院时间:心血管血管造影和介入学会的专家共识文件更新。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct 1;92(4):717-731. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27637. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
9
Fully Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Percutaneous Intervention of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions Applying the Hybrid Algorithm: Insights From RECHARGE Registry.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径行冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病变介入治疗的杂交算法:RECHARGE 注册研究的结果
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep;10(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005255.
10
Vascular Access Site and Outcomes Among 26,807 Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion Angioplasty Cases From the British Cardiovascular Interventions Society National Database.英国心血管介入学会国家数据库中 26807 例慢性完全闭塞冠状动脉介入治疗患者血管入路及结局分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr 10;10(7):635-644. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.055.