Ybarra Luiz F, Rinfret Stéphane
London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, 339 Windermere Road, Room B6-127, London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/YbarraLuiz.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McGill University, McGill University Health Centre, Glen Site, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada.
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2021 Jan;10(1):109-120. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2020.09.009.
Dual access for chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention is considered best practice by many experts. There are 2 access sites: radial and femoral. Both accesses have important advantages and disadvantages. Determining the ratio risk/benefit-efficacy/safety of each access for each patient in a specific procedure should be based on procedural and clinical variables. Given the safety benefit and the minimal procedural disadvantages, radial access should be the standard approach, especially in procedures of low complexity and in patients at high risk of vascular complications. Nonetheless, mastering both approaches is important because they are needed in multiple occasions.
