• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健中患者安全事件的医疗专业人员的反应。

Medical Professionals' Responses to a Patient Safety Incident in Healthcare.

机构信息

Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.

Department of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik, Košice, Slovakia.

出版信息

Int J Public Health. 2024 Jul 26;69:1607273. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607273. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/ijph.2024.1607273
PMID:39132384
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11310029/
Abstract

Patient safety incidents (PSIs) are common in healthcare. Open communication facilitated by psychological safety in healthcare could contribute to the prevention of PSIs and enhance patient safety. The aim of the study was to explore medical professionals' responses to a PSI in relation to psychological safety in Slovak healthcare. Sixteen individual semi-structured interviews with Slovak medical professionals were performed. Obtained qualitative data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the conventional content analysis method and the consensual qualitative research method. We identified eight responses to a PSI from medical professionals themselves as well as their colleagues, many of which were active and with regard to ensuring patient safety (e.g., notification), but some of them were passive and ultimately threatening patients' safety (e.g., silence). Five superiors' responses to the PSI were identified, both positive (e.g., supportive) and negative (e.g., exaggerated, sharp). Medical professionals' responses to a PSI are diverse, indicating a potential for enhancing psychological safety in healthcare.

摘要

患者安全事件(PSIs)在医疗保健中很常见。医疗保健中的开放沟通,通过心理安全感来促进 PSIs 的预防,并提高患者安全性。本研究的目的是探讨斯洛伐克医疗保健专业人员对 PSI 的反应与心理安全感之间的关系。对 16 名斯洛伐克医疗专业人员进行了 16 次单独的半结构化访谈。获得的定性数据逐字转录,并使用常规内容分析方法和共识定性研究方法进行分析。我们从医疗专业人员自身及其同事那里确定了对 PSI 的八种反应,其中许多是积极的,并且是为了确保患者安全(例如通知),但也有一些是被动的,最终威胁到患者的安全(例如沉默)。还确定了五位上级对 PSI 的五种反应,既有积极的(例如支持),也有消极的(例如夸大、尖锐)。医疗专业人员对 PSI 的反应是多种多样的,这表明有潜力增强医疗保健中的心理安全感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f63c/11310029/6f38e28ec631/ijph-69-1607273-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f63c/11310029/edfdf71d9622/ijph-69-1607273-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f63c/11310029/6f38e28ec631/ijph-69-1607273-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f63c/11310029/edfdf71d9622/ijph-69-1607273-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f63c/11310029/6f38e28ec631/ijph-69-1607273-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Medical Professionals' Responses to a Patient Safety Incident in Healthcare.医疗保健中患者安全事件的医疗专业人员的反应。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Jul 26;69:1607273. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607273. eCollection 2024.
2
An exploration of patient safety culture in Kuwait hospitals: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives.科威特医院患者安全文化探索:医护人员观点的定性研究。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2020 Dec;28(6):617-625. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12574. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
3
Personal, situational and organizational aspects that influence the impact of patient safety incidents: A qualitative study.影响患者安全事件影响的个人、情境和组织因素:一项定性研究。
Rev Calid Asist. 2016 Jul;31 Suppl 2:34-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
4
A qualitative evaluation of healthcare professionals' perceptions of adverse events focusing on communication and teamwork in maternity care.医疗保健专业人员对母婴保健中不良事件的认知的定性评估,重点关注沟通和团队合作。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Mar;75(3):585-593. doi: 10.1111/jan.13864. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
5
Are health professionals' perceptions of patient safety related to figures on safety incidents?卫生专业人员对患者安全的看法是否与安全事件的数字有关?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Oct;19(5):944-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01887.x. Epub 2012 Jul 29.
6
Experiences and responses of second victims of patient safety incidents in Korea: a qualitative study.韩国患者安全事件二次受害者的经历与反应:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb 6;19(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3936-1.
7
Rural healthcare professionals' participation in Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD): beyond a binary decision.农村医疗保健专业人员参与医疗辅助死亡(MAiD):超越二元决策。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Apr 25;23(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01440-4.
8
Patient safety issues and concerns in Bhutan's healthcare system: a qualitative exploratory descriptive study.不丹医疗保健系统中的患者安全问题与担忧:一项定性探索性描述性研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 30;8(7):e022788. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022788.
9
Barriers to implementing patient safety incident reporting and learning guidelines in specialised care units, KwaZulu-Natal: A qualitative study.在夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省的专业护理病房实施患者安全事件报告和学习指南的障碍:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 8;19(3):e0289857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289857. eCollection 2024.
10
A qualitative study on healthcare professionals' perceived barriers to insulin initiation in a multi-ethnic population.一项针对多民族人群中医疗保健专业人员认为的胰岛素起始障碍的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Jul 4;13:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-28.

本文引用的文献

1
Global trends and partial forecast of adverse effects of medical treatment from 1990 to 2019: an epidemiological analysis based on the global burden of disease study 2019.1990年至2019年医疗不良影响的全球趋势及部分预测:基于2019年全球疾病负担研究的流行病学分析
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 25;24(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17560-0.
2
Opportunities to strengthen resilience of health care workers regarding patient safety.加强医护人员在患者安全方面的韧性的机会。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 19;23(1):1127. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10054-0.
3
Reporting of adverse events and the fundamental tasks of managers-A qualitative interview study.
不良事件报告与管理者的基本任务:一项定性访谈研究。
Nurs Open. 2023 Sep;10(9):6291-6299. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1875. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
4
Negative emotions experienced by healthcare staff following medication administration errors: a descriptive study using text-mining and content analysis of incident data.医护人员在给药错误后经历的负面情绪:使用事件数据的文本挖掘和内容分析进行的描述性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 3;22(1):1474. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08818-1.
5
Trends in Adverse Event Rates in Hospitalized Patients, 2010-2019.2010-2019 年住院患者不良事件发生率趋势。
JAMA. 2022 Jul 12;328(2):173-183. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.9600.
6
Organizational Factors That Promote Error Reporting in Healthcare: A Scoping Review.促进医疗保健中错误报告的组织因素:范围综述。
J Healthc Manag. 2022 Jul 1;67(4):283-301. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-21-00166.
7
Common Barriers to Reporting Medical Errors.常见的报告医疗差错障碍。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2021 Jun 10;2021:6494889. doi: 10.1155/2021/6494889. eCollection 2021.
8
Preventable medication harm across health care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在医疗保健环境中可预防的药物伤害:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2020 Nov 6;18(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01774-9.
9
Action after Adverse Events in Healthcare: An Integrative Literature Review.医疗保健中不良事件后的行动:综合文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 30;17(13):4717. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134717.
10
A systematic review of factors that enable psychological safety in healthcare teams.对医疗团队中促进心理安全的因素的系统评价。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Jun 4;32(4):240-250. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa025.