• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的冠心病患者的趋势和结局:来自退伍军人事务部经导管主动脉瓣置换术注册研究的见解

Trends and Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing TAVR: Insights From VA CART.

作者信息

Shah Khanjan B, O'Donnell Colin, Mahtta Dhruv, Waldo Stephen W, Choi Calvin, Park Ki, Denktas Ali E, Paniagua David, Khalid Umair

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

Malcolm Randall VA Medical Center, Gainesville, Florida.

出版信息

J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Jun 27;2(5):101056. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101056. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.

DOI:10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101056
PMID:39132404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11307520/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is common in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. The management and impact of obstructive CAD in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have not been fully evaluated. We aimed to determine the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes among veterans undergoing TAVR with and without obstructive CAD and to determine temporal trends and association of pre-TAVR percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We identified all patients who underwent TAVR from 2012 to 2021 in the VA Health Care System. The sample population was divided into patients with and without obstructive CAD and further stratified by coronary intervention status 1 year prior to TAVR. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was major bleeding.

RESULTS

During the study period, 759 patients underwent TAVR, and 282 (37%) had obstructive CAD. Obstructive CAD was associated with higher 1-year mortality (15.6% vs 7.1%; < .01) after TAVR. The rate of PCI prior to TAVR increased from 2012 until 2016, after which it steadily declined such that 144 patients (51%) underwent PCI pre-TAVR during the entire study period. There was no difference in 1-year mortality (16.0% vs 15.2%; = .89) or bleeding (16.7% vs 12.3%; = .33) between patients who underwent or did not undergo pre-TAVR PCI.

CONCLUSIONS

Among veterans undergoing TAVR, the presence of obstructive CAD is associated with higher mortality though pre-TAVR coronary intervention is not associated with improved outcomes. Further studies could identify a subset of patients who may benefit from coronary revascularization prior to TAVR.

摘要

背景

阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)在有严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄的患者中很常见。经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者中阻塞性CAD的管理及影响尚未得到充分评估。我们旨在确定有和没有阻塞性CAD的退伍军人接受TAVR后的患者特征和临床结局,并确定TAVR前经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的时间趋势及其与临床结局的关联。

方法

我们识别了2012年至2021年在退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗保健系统中接受TAVR的所有患者。样本人群分为有和没有阻塞性CAD的患者,并根据TAVR前1年的冠状动脉介入治疗状态进一步分层。主要结局是1年全因死亡率,次要结局是大出血。

结果

在研究期间,759例患者接受了TAVR,其中282例(37%)有阻塞性CAD。阻塞性CAD与TAVR后较高的1年死亡率相关(15.6%对7.1%;P<0.01)。TAVR前PCI的发生率从2012年至2016年上升,此后稳步下降,以至于在整个研究期间有144例患者(51%)在TAVR前接受了PCI。接受或未接受TAVR前PCI的患者在1年死亡率(16.0%对15.2%;P=0.89)或出血(16.7%对12.3%;P=0.33)方面没有差异。

结论

在接受TAVR的退伍军人中,阻塞性CAD的存在与较高死亡率相关,尽管TAVR前冠状动脉介入治疗与改善结局无关。进一步的研究可以确定可能从TAVR前冠状动脉血运重建中获益的患者亚组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2194/11307520/88bb2c9b7055/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2194/11307520/fac03e897480/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2194/11307520/928d39b20eef/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2194/11307520/5018ecd7b722/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2194/11307520/b1856bd840ec/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2194/11307520/c210357bd594/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2194/11307520/88bb2c9b7055/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2194/11307520/fac03e897480/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2194/11307520/928d39b20eef/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2194/11307520/5018ecd7b722/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2194/11307520/b1856bd840ec/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2194/11307520/c210357bd594/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2194/11307520/88bb2c9b7055/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends and Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing TAVR: Insights From VA CART.接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的冠心病患者的趋势和结局:来自退伍军人事务部经导管主动脉瓣置换术注册研究的见解
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Jun 27;2(5):101056. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101056. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.
2
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Complex Calcific Coronary Lesions Utilizing Orbital Atherectomy Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经皮冠状动脉介入术治疗复杂钙化冠状动脉病变,在经导管主动脉瓣置换术之前使用轨道旋磨术。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Apr;37:82-85. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.06.117. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
3
Optimized Screening of Coronary Artery Disease With Invasive Coronary Angiography and Ad Hoc Percutaneous Coronary Intervention During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中以有创冠状动脉造影和临时经皮冠状动脉介入优化筛查冠状动脉疾病。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug;10(8). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005234.
4
Clinical Outcomes of Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在前瞻性经导管主动脉瓣置换术之前的临床转归:一项全面的荟萃分析。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022 Nov;47(11):101339. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101339. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
5
The Effect of Coronary Lesion Complexity and Preprocedural Revascularization on 5-Year Outcomes After TAVR.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后 5 年的冠状动脉病变复杂性和术前血运重建对预后的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Aug 22;15(16):1611-1620. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.06.019.
6
Impact of coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention in women undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: From the WIN-TAVI registry.冠心病及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术女性患者的影响:来自WIN-TAVI注册研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 1;93(6):1124-1131. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28012. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
7
Assessment and management of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的冠状动脉疾病评估与管理。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2020 Sep;35(5):540-547. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000768.
8
Coronary artery disease, revascularization, and clinical outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Real-world results from the East Denmark Heart Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗中的冠状动脉疾病、血运重建和临床结局:来自丹麦东部心脏注册中心的真实世界结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct 1;92(4):818-826. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27440. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
9
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease.复杂冠状动脉疾病患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 22;14(22):2490-2499. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.073.
10
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement- management of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing aortic valve interventions: surgical compared to catheter-based approaches in hybrid procedures.经导管主动脉瓣置换术- 主动脉瓣介入治疗中合并严重冠状动脉疾病患者的管理:杂交手术中经导管与外科手术方法的比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 May 14;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1087-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Coronary Artery Disease and Severe Aortic Stenosis: Contemporary Treatment Options for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.冠状动脉疾病与严重主动脉瓣狭窄:经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的当代治疗选择
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 14;13(24):7625. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247625.

本文引用的文献

1
National Trends in TAVR and SAVR for Patients With Severe Isolated Aortic Stenosis.严重单纯性主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)和外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的全国趋势
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Nov 22;80(21):2054-2056. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.787. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
2
The Effect of Coronary Lesion Complexity and Preprocedural Revascularization on 5-Year Outcomes After TAVR.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后 5 年的冠状动脉病变复杂性和术前血运重建对预后的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Aug 22;15(16):1611-1620. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.06.019.
3
ACTIVATION (PercutAneous Coronary inTervention prIor to transcatheter aortic VAlve implantaTION): A Randomized Clinical Trial.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在前瞻性经导管主动脉瓣植入术之前的作用:一项随机临床试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep 27;14(18):1965-1974. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.06.041.
4
STS-ACC TVT Registry of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的STS-ACC TVT注册研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Nov 24;76(21):2492-2516. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.595.
5
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Programs: Clinical Outcomes and Developments.经导管主动脉瓣置换计划:临床结果与进展。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 21;9(8):e015921. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.015921. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
6
Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease.稳定型冠心病的初始侵入性或保守治疗策略。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 9;382(15):1395-1407. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915922. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
7
Comparison of a Complete Percutaneous Versus Surgical Approach to Aortic Valve Replacement and Revascularization in Patients at Intermediate Surgical Risk: Results From the Randomized SURTAVI Trial.中度手术风险患者经皮完全主动脉瓣置换与手术主动脉瓣置换及血运重建的比较:随机SURTAVI试验结果
Circulation. 2019 Oct 15;140(16):1296-1305. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.039564. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
8
Outcomes of Veterans Undergoing TAVR Within Veterans Affairs Medical Centers: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program.在退伍军人事务医疗中心接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的退伍军人的结局:来自退伍军人事务临床评估、报告和跟踪计划的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 11;12(21):2186-2194. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.040. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
9
Association of Coronary Anatomical Complexity With Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization in the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program.退伍军人事务部临床评估报告和跟踪计划中,经皮或手术血运重建后冠状动脉解剖复杂性与临床结局的关系。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Aug 1;4(8):727-735. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1923.
10
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Artery Revascularization Strategy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术联合或不联合经皮冠状动脉血运重建策略:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jun 27;6(6):e005960. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005960.