Moss Alexander C, Chen Ang
Department of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, USA.
Quest. 2024;76(3):363-381. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2024.2351834. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
The line between gender and sex has become increasingly muddled in recent scientific literature, including within physical education. Tensions surrounding this topic are ever-increasing and definitions of the two are rarely consistent. For improving conceptual clarity for research, we adopted the Social Role Theory to offer spaces for researchers to explore how these two terms differ and relate by laying out a cyclical framework of biological, sociological, and psychological components. Herein, we discuss the origins of the binary sex construct, anatomical brain/ cognition differences, and sex/gender role implications for education and physical education. In this conceptual paper, we confront the controversial topic in a content area that continues to be masculine-oriented with the purpose to conceptualize sex/gender in physical education research through clarifying the evolutionary bio-social spectrum. Offering a reconceptualization of gender as a multi-dimensional construct in physical education could inspire further curricular reform for the content to be more inclusive of all participants, learnable by all students regardless of sex and gender, and beneficial both mentally and physically to all learners.
在包括体育教育领域在内的近期科学文献中,性别与性别的界限日益模糊。围绕这一话题的紧张关系不断加剧,而且这两者的定义很少一致。为了提高研究的概念清晰度,我们采用社会角色理论,通过构建一个由生物学、社会学和心理学成分组成的循环框架,为研究人员提供空间,以探讨这两个术语的差异和联系。在此,我们讨论二元性别的构建起源、大脑解剖/认知差异以及性别角色对教育和体育教育的影响。在这篇概念性论文中,我们在一个仍然以男性为主导的内容领域直面这一有争议的话题,目的是通过厘清进化生物社会谱系,在体育教育研究中对性/性别进行概念化。将性别重新概念化为体育教育中的多维结构,可能会激发进一步的课程改革,使教学内容更能包容所有参与者,所有学生无论性别都能学习,并且对所有学习者的身心健康都有益处。