Petutschnigg Thomas, Häni Levin, Goldberg Johannes, Dobrocky Tomas, Piechowiak Eike I, Raabe Andreas, Jesse C Marvin, Schär Ralph T
Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern , Switzerland.
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern , Switzerland.
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2025 Mar 1;28(3):379-385. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000001310. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
In patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH), microsurgical repair is recommended in Type 1 (ventral) dural leaks, when conservative measures fail. However, there is lacking consensus on the optimal surgical technique for permanent and safe closure of ventral leaks.
We performed a retrospective analysis of surgically treated SIH patients with Type 1 leaks at our institution between 2013 and 2023. Patients were analyzed according to the type of surgical technique: (1) Microsurgical suture vs (2) extradural and intradural patching (sealing technique). End points were resolution of spinal longitudinal epidural cerebrospinal fluid collection (SLEC), change in brain SIH-Score (Bern-Score), headache resolution after 3 months, surgery time, complications, and reoperation rates.
In total, 85 (66% women) patients with consecutive SIH (mean age 47 ± 11 years) underwent transdural microsurgical repair. The leak was sutured in 53 (62%) patients (suture group) and patch-sealed in 32 (38%) patients (sealing group). We found no significant difference in the rates of residual SLEC and resolution of headache between suture and sealing groups (13% vs 22%, P = .238 and 89% vs 94%, P = .508). No changes were found in the postoperative Bern-Score between suture and sealing groups (1.4 [±1.6] vs 1.7 [±2.1] P = 1). Mean surgery time was significantly shorter in the sealing group than in the suture group (139 ± 48 vs 169 ± 51 minutes; P = .007). Ten patients of the suture and 3 of the sealing group had a complication (23% vs 9%, P = .212), whereas 6 patients of the suture and 2 patients of the sealing group required reoperation (11% vs 6%, P = .438).
Microsurgical suturing and patch-sealing of ventral dural leaks in patients with SIH are equally effective. Sealing alone is a significantly faster technique, requiring less spinal cord manipulation and may therefore minimize the risk of surgical complications.
对于自发性颅内低压(SIH)患者,当保守治疗失败时,建议对1型(腹侧)硬脑膜漏进行显微外科修复。然而,对于永久性安全闭合腹侧漏的最佳手术技术,目前尚无共识。
我们对2013年至2023年在我院接受手术治疗的1型漏的SIH患者进行了回顾性分析。根据手术技术类型对患者进行分析:(1)显微外科缝合与(2)硬膜外和硬膜内修补(封闭技术)。终点指标为脊髓纵向硬膜外脑脊液聚集(SLEC)的消退、脑SIH评分(伯尔尼评分)的变化、3个月后头痛缓解情况、手术时间、并发症及再次手术率。
共有85例(66%为女性)连续性SIH患者(平均年龄47±11岁)接受了经硬膜显微外科修复。53例(62%)患者采用缝合漏口的方法(缝合组),32例(38%)患者采用修补封闭漏口的方法(封闭组)。我们发现缝合组和封闭组之间残余SLEC率和头痛缓解率无显著差异(分别为13%对22%,P = 0.238;89%对94%,P = 0.508)。缝合组和封闭组术后伯尔尼评分无变化(分别为1.4[±1.6]对1.7[±2.1],P = 1)。封闭组的平均手术时间显著短于缝合组(分别为139±48分钟对169±51分钟;P = 0.007)。缝合组10例患者和封闭组3例患者出现并发症(分别为23%对9%,P = 0.212),而缝合组6例患者和封闭组2例患者需要再次手术(分别为11%对6%,P = 0.438)。
SIH患者腹侧硬脑膜漏的显微外科缝合和修补封闭同样有效。单纯封闭是一种明显更快的技术,需要更少的脊髓操作,因此可能将手术并发症风险降至最低。