Suppr超能文献

高危非肌层浸润性膀胱癌经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术再分期时残余肿瘤的预后意义。

Prognostic significance of residual tumor at restaging transurethral bladder resection in high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

机构信息

Department of Urology, La Conception Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France.

Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2024 Aug 12;42(1):480. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05192-x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess prognostic significance of residual tumor at repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) in contemporary non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients.

METHODS

Patients were identified retrospectively from eight referral centers in France, Italy and Spain. The cohort included consecutive patients with high or very-high risk NMIBC who underwent reTUR and subsequent adjuvant BCG therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 440 high-risk NMIBC patients were screened, 29 (6%) were upstaged ≥ T2 at reTUR and 411 were analyzed (T1 stage: n = 275, 67%). Residual tumor was found in 191 cases (46%). In patients with T1 tumor on initial TURBT, persistent T1 tumor was found in 18% of reTUR (n = 49/275). In patients with high-grade Ta tumor on initial TURBT, T1 tumor was found in 6% of reTUR (n = 9/136). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, we found no statistical association between the use of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD, p = 0.4) or type of resection (conventional vs. en bloc, p = 0.6) and the risk of residual tumor. The estimated 5-yr recurrence and progression-free survival were 56% and 94%, respectively. Residual tumor was significantly associated with a higher risk of recurrence (p < 0.001) but not progression (p = 0.11). Only residual T1 tumor was associated with a higher risk of progression (p < 0.001) with an estimated 5-yr progression-free survival rate of 76%.

CONCLUSIONS

ReTUR should remain a standard for T1 tumors, irrespective of the use of en bloc resection or PDD and could be safely omitted in high-grade Ta tumors. Persistent T1 tumor at reTUR should not exclude these patients from conservative management, and further studies are needed to explore the benefit of a third resection in this subgroup.

摘要

目的

评估在当代非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者中重复经尿道电切术(reTUR)后残余肿瘤的预后意义。

方法

从法国、意大利和西班牙的 8 个转诊中心回顾性地确定了患者。该队列包括接受 reTUR 及随后辅助卡介苗(BCG)治疗的高风险或极高风险 NMIBC 连续患者。

结果

共筛选了 440 例高危 NMIBC 患者,29 例(6%)在 reTUR 时升级为≥T2,411 例进行了分析(T1 期:n=275,67%)。191 例(46%)发现残余肿瘤。在初始 TURBT 为 T1 肿瘤的患者中,reTUR 中发现持续 T1 肿瘤的比例为 18%(n=49/275)。在初始 TURBT 为高级别 Ta 肿瘤的患者中,reTUR 中发现 T1 肿瘤的比例为 6%(n=9/136)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,我们发现使用光动力诊断(PDD,p=0.4)或切除类型(常规 vs. 整块,p=0.6)与残余肿瘤风险之间无统计学关联。估计的 5 年复发和无进展生存率分别为 56%和 94%。残余肿瘤与更高的复发风险显著相关(p<0.001),但与进展无关(p=0.11)。只有残余 T1 肿瘤与更高的进展风险相关(p<0.001),估计 5 年无进展生存率为 76%。

结论

reTUR 应仍是 T1 肿瘤的标准治疗方法,无论是否使用整块切除或 PDD,高分级 Ta 肿瘤均可安全省略。reTUR 时持续存在 T1 肿瘤不应使这些患者排除在保守治疗之外,需要进一步研究来探索在该亚组中第三次切除的获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验