Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland.
Universität Siegen, Siegen, Deutschland.
NTM. 2024 Sep;32(3):213-250. doi: 10.1007/s00048-024-00399-w. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
The text attempts to understand the development of collaborative audiovisual knowledge practices in anthropology as situated and diffractive knowledge (Haraway, Barad, Smith). By considering specific stages in the history of collaborative and participatory projects, the article argues that collaborative filmmaking is not only a decentering of one-sided authorship and one-sided modes of representation, but also a media-specific form of knowledge that is bound to and embedded in social contexts. Through the example of colonial film, the article describes stations of demarcation and attempts to decolonize film. Current film experiments with marginalized groups have their origins in "shared anthropologies" (Rouch) and have further developed this approach through more consistent forms of Fourth Cinema and power sharing with Indigenous communities. Film is thus also able to depict amateur knowledge practices within collaborative research projects.
这段文本试图理解人类学中协作视听知识实践的发展,将其视为情境化和有散射性的知识(哈拉威、巴拉德、史密斯)。通过考虑协作和参与式项目历史上的特定阶段,本文认为协作电影制作不仅是对片面创作和片面表现模式的去中心化,而且是一种特定于媒体的知识形式,它必然与社会背景联系在一起并嵌入其中。通过殖民电影的例子,本文描述了划分的阶段,并试图对电影进行非殖民化。当前与边缘化群体合作的电影实验起源于“共享人类学”(Rouch),并通过更一致的第四电影形式和与土著社区分享权力进一步发展了这种方法。因此,电影也能够描绘协作研究项目中的业余知识实践。