Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Department of Computational Science and Philosophy, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Frankfurt a. M, Germany.
Infect Dis (Lond). 2024 Oct;56(10):897-902. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2024.2388222. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
Public health systems reported low mortality from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in East Asia, in low-income countries, and for children during the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. These reports led commentators to suggest that cross-reactive immunity from prior exposure to other pathogens reduced fatality risk. Resolution of initial infection waves also contributed to speculation that herd immunity prevented further waves prior to vaccination. Serology instead implied that immunity was too limited to achieve herd immunity and that there was little impact from cross-reactive protection. Paediatric deaths exceeded those from influenza, with higher age-specific fatality risk in lower-income nations and similar fatality risk in East Asia compared with demographically similar regions. Neither pre-outbreak exposure to related pathogens nor immunity induced by initial infection waves are necessarily a reliable response to future pathogen outbreaks. Preparedness for future pathogen outbreaks should instead focus on strategies such as voluntary behavioural changes, nonpharmaceutical interventions, and vaccination.
公共卫生系统报告称,在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行的第一年,东亚、低收入国家和儿童的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)死亡率较低。这些报告导致评论员提出,先前暴露于其他病原体产生的交叉反应性免疫降低了死亡风险。初始感染浪潮的解决也促使人们猜测,在接种疫苗之前,群体免疫阻止了进一步的浪潮。然而,血清学研究表明,免疫的局限性太大,无法实现群体免疫,交叉反应性保护的影响也很小。儿科死亡人数超过了流感,在低收入国家,特定年龄组的死亡率风险更高,与人口统计学相似的东亚地区相比,死亡率风险相似。无论是爆发前对相关病原体的暴露还是初始感染浪潮引起的免疫,都不一定是对未来病原体爆发的可靠反应。未来病原体爆发的准备工作应侧重于自愿行为改变、非药物干预和疫苗接种等策略。