UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia 5000, Australia.
Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia 5000, Australia.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2024 Oct;203:114453. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2024.114453. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
Increasing attention is being afforded to understanding the bidirectional relationship that exists between oral drugs and the gut microbiota. Often overlooked, however, is the impact that pharmaceutical excipients exert on the gut microbiota. Subsequently, in this study, we contrasted the pharmacokinetic performance and gut microbiota interactions between two commonly employed formulations for poorly soluble compounds, namely 1) an amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) stabilised by poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) K-30, and 2) a lipid nanoemulsion (LNE) comprised of medium chain glycerides and lecithin. The poorly soluble antipsychotic, lurasidone, was formulated with ASD and LNE due to its rate-limiting dissolution, poor oral bioavailability, and significant food effect. Both the ASD and LNE were shown to facilitate lurasidone supersaturation within in vitro dissolution studies simulating the gastrointestinal environment. This translated into profound improvements in oral pharmacokinetics in rats, with the ASD and LNE exerting comparable ∼ 2.5-fold improvements in lurasidone bioavailability, compared to the pure drug. The oral formulations imparted contrasting effects on the gut microbiota, with the LNE depleting the richness and abundance of the microbial ecosystem, as evidenced through reductions in alpha diversity (Chao1 index) and operational taxonomical units (OTUs). In contrast, the ASD exerted a 'gut neutral' effect, whereby a mild enrichment of alpha diversity and OTUs was observed. Importantly, this suggests that ASDs are effective solubility-enhancing formulations that can be used without comprising the integrity of the gut microbiota - an integral consideration in the treatment of mental health disorders, such as schizophrenia, due to the role of the gut microbiota in regulating mood and cognition.
人们越来越关注理解口服药物与肠道微生物群之间存在的双向关系。然而,经常被忽视的是药用辅料对肠道微生物群的影响。因此,在这项研究中,我们对比了两种常用于难溶性化合物的制剂的药代动力学性能和肠道微生物群相互作用,这两种制剂分别为 1)由聚乙烯吡咯烷酮 K-30 稳定的无定形固体分散体(ASD),和 2)由中链甘油酯和卵磷脂组成的脂质纳米乳液(LNE)。由于其限速溶解、口服生物利用度差和显著的食物效应,将难溶性抗精神病药鲁拉西酮制成 ASD 和 LNE 制剂。ASD 和 LNE 在模拟胃肠道环境的体外溶解研究中均能促进鲁拉西酮过饱和。这转化为在大鼠体内口服药代动力学的显著改善,ASD 和 LNE 使鲁拉西酮的生物利用度提高了约 2.5 倍,与纯药物相比。口服制剂对肠道微生物群产生了相反的影响,LNE 耗尽了微生物生态系统的丰富度和丰度,这表现在α多样性(Chao1 指数)和操作分类单元(OTUs)的减少。相比之下,ASD 产生了“肠道中性”的效果,观察到α多样性和 OTUs 的轻度富集。重要的是,这表明 ASDs 是有效的增溶制剂,可在不损害肠道微生物群完整性的情况下使用,这在治疗精神健康障碍(如精神分裂症)时是一个重要的考虑因素,因为肠道微生物群在调节情绪和认知方面发挥着作用。