欧洲精神科医生对迷幻药的态度:一项横断面调查研究。

Attitudes of European psychiatrists on psychedelics: a cross-sectional survey study.

机构信息

Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2a, 21000, Split, Croatia.

Department of Medical Humanities, University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2a, 21000, Split, Croatia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 12;14(1):18716. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69688-7.

Abstract

Research and public interest in psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy (PAP) are growing. This study investigated attitudes toward psychedelics among a diverse and multinational sample of psychiatrists currently working in Europe. We conducted an anonymous, web-based survey consisting of demographic information, a test of basic knowledge on psychedelics, and the previously validated 20-item Attitudes on Psychedelics Questionnaire (APQ), which was validated for the first time in English within this sample. We included N = 419 participants from 33 countries in the study. One-third of participants (34%) reported past use of psychedelics. The APQ sub-scale with the highest score was Openness to Psychedelics, while Risk Assessment of Psychedelics was rated lowest. Regression modelling, explaining 31.3% of variance in APQ scores, showed that younger male psychiatrists who identified as spiritual, were better at recognizing and classifying substances as psychedelics and had previously used psychedelics had more positive attitudes on psychedelics. No professional variables besides self-reported previous experience with PAP or psychedelic research predicted APQ scores. European psychiatrists, therefore, show a general openness to psychedelics and PAP, but are concerned by the potential risks associated with them. Our findings overall suggest that psychedelics are a subject where it is difficult to remain impartial. Protocol registration: The study was pre-registered at the Open Science Framework (available online at https://osf.io/upkv3 ).

摘要

研究和公众对迷幻药辅助心理治疗(PAP)的兴趣正在增长。本研究调查了目前在欧洲工作的不同和多国精神病医生对迷幻剂的态度。我们进行了一项匿名的、基于网络的调查,其中包括人口统计学信息、迷幻剂基本知识测试和之前经过验证的 20 项迷幻剂态度问卷(APQ),该问卷在本样本中首次以英文进行验证。我们在研究中包括了来自 33 个国家的 419 名参与者。三分之一的参与者(34%)报告过去使用过迷幻剂。APQ 量表中得分最高的子量表是对迷幻剂的开放性,而对迷幻剂的风险评估得分最低。解释 APQ 得分 31.3%差异的回归模型显示,年轻的男性精神病医生如果认为自己是精神上的,更善于识别和分类物质作为迷幻剂,并且之前使用过迷幻剂,那么他们对迷幻剂的态度就越积极。除了自我报告的 PAP 或迷幻剂研究经验外,没有其他专业变量可以预测 APQ 得分。因此,欧洲精神病医生总体上对迷幻剂和 PAP 持开放态度,但对与之相关的潜在风险感到担忧。我们的研究结果总体表明,迷幻剂是一个很难保持公正的主题。研究方案注册:该研究在开放科学框架(可在 https://osf.io/upkv3 在线获取)上预先注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cd8/11319490/613277a32b04/41598_2024_69688_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索