Levitt M
Brain Res. 1985 Dec;357(3):247-90. doi: 10.1016/0165-0173(85)90027-x.
The chronic deafferentation syndrome includes a complex pattern of abnormal self-directed behavior and a stress response. Subhuman self-mutilation is a secondary consequence of the chronic deafferentation syndrome. The evidence indicates that the chronic deafferentation syndrome in subhumans is a valid model for the induced and the spontaneous dysesthesias in humans. Objective criteria for the definition of subhuman dysesthesias have been derived from independent sources of evidence, in neurally intact subjects; those criteria are then found to match the subhuman syndrome of deafferentation. Support for the validity of the inference of subhuman dysesthesias derives from the parallels with the various facts of the human dysesthesias. The credibility of this argument is significantly strengthened by reports of morphological and excitatory physiological abnormalities, in central somatosensory structures, in response to deafferentation. There is no independent subhuman evidence in support of alternate interpretations of the deafferentation syndrome, and those interpretations seem to be inadequate in several aspects. Doubts concerning the validity of this animal model have been allayed by reports of dysesthesias in humans with spinal posterior rhizotomies or ganglionectomies, and also those with congenital analgesia. Moreover, the occurrence of this syndrome in hypoalgesic areas as a consequence of anterolateral cordotomy in monkeys, can best be interpreted as a reflection of dysesthesias. This syndrome is released by neuropathological or neurosurgical lesions in the peripheral or central nervous system; lesions which involve small caliber peripheral afferents or the spinothalamic tract. Variability in the release of this syndrome has been associated with several different factors. So far, the chronic syndrome is intractable. Evidence relates the abnormalities of this syndrome to pathophysiological foci in central relays of the somatosensory system, and suggests that the chronic abnormalities of this syndrome can be sustained at brain levels.
慢性去传入综合征包括一系列复杂的异常自我导向行为和应激反应模式。非人动物的自残行为是慢性去传入综合征的继发后果。有证据表明,非人动物的慢性去传入综合征是人类诱发性和自发性感觉异常的有效模型。非人动物感觉异常定义的客观标准源自神经功能正常受试者的独立证据来源;然后发现这些标准与非人动物的去传入综合征相匹配。非人动物感觉异常推断的有效性得到了与人类感觉异常各种事实的相似性的支持。中枢体感结构中因去传入而出现的形态学和兴奋性生理异常的报告显著增强了这一论点的可信度。没有独立的非人动物证据支持对去传入综合征的其他解释,而且这些解释在几个方面似乎都不充分。脊髓后根切断术或神经节切除术患者以及先天性无痛觉患者出现感觉异常的报告消除了对这种动物模型有效性的怀疑。此外,猴子因脊髓前外侧切开术导致痛觉减退区域出现这种综合征,最好解释为感觉异常的反映。这种综合征由外周或中枢神经系统的神经病理或神经外科损伤引发;这些损伤涉及小口径外周传入神经或脊髓丘脑束。该综合征发作的变异性与几个不同因素有关。到目前为止,这种慢性综合征难以治疗。有证据将该综合征的异常与体感系统中枢中继中的病理生理病灶联系起来,并表明该综合征的慢性异常可在脑水平维持。