Suppr超能文献

范围综述搜索实践在社会科学中的应用:范围综述。

Scoping review search practices in the social sciences: A scoping review.

机构信息

University of Toronto Libraries, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

McGill University Library, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Res Synth Methods. 2024 Nov;15(6):950-963. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1742. Epub 2024 Aug 12.

Abstract

A thorough literature search is a key feature of scoping reviews. We investigated the search practices used by social science researchers as reported in their scoping reviews. We collected scoping reviews published between 2015 and 2021 from Social Science Citation Index. In the 2484 included studies, we observed a 58% average annual increase in published reviews, primarily from clinical and applied social science disciplines. Bibliographic databases comprised most of the information sources in the primary search strategy (n = 9565, 75%), although reporting practices varied. Most scoping reviews (n = 1805, 73%) included at least one supplementary search strategy. A minority of studies (n = 713, 29%) acknowledged an LIS professional and few listed one as a co-author (n = 194, 8%). We conclude that to improve reporting and strengthen the impact of the scoping review method in the social sciences, researchers should consider (1) adhering to PRISMA-S reporting guidelines, (2) employing more supplementary search strategies, and (3) collaborating with LIS professionals.

摘要

全面文献检索是范围综述的一个关键特征。我们调查了社会科学研究人员在其范围综述中报告的搜索实践。我们从社会科学引文索引中收集了 2015 年至 2021 年发表的范围综述。在纳入的 2484 项研究中,我们观察到发表的综述数量以每年 58%的速度增长,主要来自临床和应用社会科学学科。书目数据库构成了主要检索策略中的大多数信息来源(n=9565,75%),尽管报告做法有所不同。大多数范围综述(n=1805,73%)至少包括一种补充检索策略。少数研究(n=713,29%)承认有一名 LIS 专业人员,很少有将其列为合著者(n=194,8%)。我们的结论是,为了提高报告质量并加强范围综述方法在社会科学中的影响力,研究人员应该考虑(1)遵守 PRISMA-S 报告指南,(2)采用更多的补充检索策略,以及(3)与 LIS 专业人员合作。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验