• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特泊替尼联合化疗治疗转移性三阴性乳腺癌的成本效果分析。

Toripalimab plus chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 29;12:1421826. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1421826. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1421826
PMID:39135924
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11317436/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study focuses on assessing the cost-effectiveness of incorporating toripalimab alongside chemotherapy for the treatment of patients diagnosed with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model was constructed to simulate the costs and health outcomes over the lifetime of patients with mTNBC. Clinical data regarding overall survival, progression-free survival, and treatment-related adverse events were derived from the TORCHLIGHT clinical trials. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated based on the gains in quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was defined as $39,855.79 per QALY. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of the model.

RESULTS

The total cost incurred by the group receiving toripalimab was $38,040.62, while the placebo plus chemotherapy was $26,102.07. The utilization of the toripalimab regimen resulted in an increase of 0.74 QALYs and an incremental cost of $11,938.55 compared to the placebo plus chemotherapy group. The ICER was $16,133.18/QALY, indicating that toripalimab plus chemotherapy is a cost-effective strategy according to the WTP threshold. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the addition of toripalimab to chemotherapy for the treatment of mTNBC is a cost-effective strategy. The findings provide valuable evidence to guide decision-making regarding treatment selection for patients with mTNBC in China.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在从中国医疗保健系统的角度评估替雷利珠单抗联合化疗治疗转移性三阴性乳腺癌(mTNBC)患者的成本效益。

方法

构建了一个分割生存模型,以模拟 mTNBC 患者的终生成本和健康结果。总生存期、无进展生存期和治疗相关不良事件的临床数据来源于 TORCHLIGHT 临床试验。根据质量调整生命年(QALY)的获益计算增量成本效果比(ICER)。意愿支付阈值(WTP)定义为每 QALY 39,855.79 美元。此外,还进行了敏感性分析以检验模型的稳健性。

结果

接受替雷利珠单抗治疗的患者总费用为 38,040.62 美元,而安慰剂加化疗组为 26,102.07 美元。与安慰剂加化疗组相比,替雷利珠单抗方案的使用导致 QALY 增加了 0.74 个,增量成本为 11,938.55 美元。ICER 为 16,133.18/QALY,表明替雷利珠单抗联合化疗符合 WTP 阈值的成本效益策略。敏感性分析证实了结果的稳健性。

结论

本研究表明,替雷利珠单抗联合化疗治疗 mTNBC 是一种具有成本效益的策略。研究结果为中国 mTNBC 患者的治疗选择提供了有价值的决策依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efd9/11317436/6e0ceb5fe3eb/fpubh-12-1421826-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efd9/11317436/e8fea2b93572/fpubh-12-1421826-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efd9/11317436/21fa37bb456f/fpubh-12-1421826-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efd9/11317436/6e0ceb5fe3eb/fpubh-12-1421826-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efd9/11317436/e8fea2b93572/fpubh-12-1421826-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efd9/11317436/21fa37bb456f/fpubh-12-1421826-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efd9/11317436/6e0ceb5fe3eb/fpubh-12-1421826-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Toripalimab plus chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.特泊替尼联合化疗治疗转移性三阴性乳腺癌的成本效果分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 29;12:1421826. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1421826. eCollection 2024.
2
Toripalimab plus chemotherapy in American patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.特瑞普利单抗联合化疗治疗美国复发性或转移性鼻咽癌患者的成本效果分析。
Cancer Med. 2024 May;13(10):e7243. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7243.
3
Cost-effectiveness of Sacituzumab Govitecan versus Single-agent Chemotherapy for Patients with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in China.中国转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者Sacituzumab Govitecan 与单药化疗相比的成本效益。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2024 Oct;24(7):e545-e553.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.04.010. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
4
Economic evaluation of toripalimab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.特瑞普利单抗联合化疗治疗非小细胞肺癌的经济学评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 24;11:1137255. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1137255. eCollection 2023.
5
Economic value of toripalimab plus axitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma in China: a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis.特瑞普利单抗联合阿昔替尼作为中国晚期肾细胞癌一线治疗的经济学价值:基于模型的成本效果分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Jun;24(5):653-659. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2333334. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
6
Cost‑effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.替雷利珠单抗联合化疗治疗中国晚期或转移性食管鳞癌患者的成本-效果分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 31;14(1):17734. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68399-3.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China.特瑞普利单抗联合化疗对比单纯化疗用于中国晚期非小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析。
Front Immunol. 2023 May 29;14:1169752. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1169752. eCollection 2023.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of toripalimab plus chemotherapy for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China.托瑞帕利单抗联合化疗用于中国晚期食管鳞状细胞癌患者的成本效益分析
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Feb;24(2):285-292. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2270159. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
9
Cost-effectiveness of toripalimab plus chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.特瑞普利单抗联合化疗治疗晚期食管鳞癌的成本效果分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Jun;45(3):641-649. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01540-w. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China.替雷利珠单抗联合化疗一线治疗中国晚期或转移性食管鳞癌的成本效果分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 15;19(5):e0302961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302961. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for patients with previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in China.帕博利珠单抗联合化疗与安慰剂联合化疗用于中国既往未治疗的局部复发性不可切除或转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者的成本效益分析
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 22;16:1654177. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1654177. eCollection 2025.
2
Toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.托瑞帕利单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗作为广泛期小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本效益分析
Front Immunol. 2025 Jul 1;16:1591517. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1591517. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.2022 年全球癌症统计数据:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率全球估计数。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
Toripalimab plus nab-paclitaxel in metastatic or recurrent triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial.特泊替尼联合白蛋白紫杉醇用于转移性或复发性三阴性乳腺癌:一项随机 3 期试验。
Nat Med. 2024 Jan;30(1):249-256. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02677-x. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
3
Price negotiation and pricing of anticancer drugs in China: An observational study.
中国抗肿瘤药物的价格谈判和定价:一项观察性研究。
PLoS Med. 2024 Jan 2;21(1):e1004332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004332. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus chemotherapy treated in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on the DESTINY-Breast02 trial.曲妥珠单抗 deruxtecan 对比化疗治疗人表皮生长因子受体 2 阳性转移性乳腺癌患者:基于 DESTINY-Breast02 试验的成本效果分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Mar;24(3):387-395. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2291157. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
5
Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.晚期三阴性乳腺癌。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2024 Feb;40(1):151548. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151548. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
6
A review of cost-effectiveness analysis: From theory to clinical practice.成本效益分析述评:从理论到临床实践。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Oct 20;102(42):e35614. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035614.
7
An overview of current advances of PD-L1 targeting immuno-imaging in cancers.癌症中 PD-L1 靶向免疫成像的最新进展概述。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2023 Aug;19(4):866-875. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_88_23.
8
Advances in immunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer.三阴性乳腺癌的免疫治疗进展。
Mol Cancer. 2023 Sep 2;22(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12943-023-01850-7.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-low advanced breast cancer based on DESTINY-Breast04.基于 DESTINY-Breast04 研究的曲妥珠单抗-德鲁替康治疗 HER2 低表达晚期乳腺癌的成本效果分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 30;11:1049947. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1049947. eCollection 2023.
10
Advances in systemic therapies for triple negative breast cancer.三阴性乳腺癌的系统治疗进展。
BMJ. 2023 May 30;381:e071674. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071674.