Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Oct 1;36(10):2166-2183. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02235.
A rapidly growing body of work suggests that visual working memory (VWM) is fundamentally action oriented. Consistent with this, we recently showed that attention is more strongly biased by VWM representations of objects when we plan to act on those objects in the future. Using EEG and eye tracking, here, we investigated neurophysiological correlates of the interactions between VWM and action. Participants (n = 36) memorized a shape for a subsequent VWM test. At test, a probe was presented along with a secondary object. In the action condition, participants gripped the actual probe if it matched the memorized shape, whereas in the control condition, they gripped the secondary object. Crucially, during the VWM delay, participants engaged in a visual selection task, in which they located a target as fast as possible. The memorized shape could either encircle the target (congruent trials) or a distractor (incongruent trials). Replicating previous findings, we found that eye gaze was biased toward the VWM-matching shape and, importantly, more so when the shape was directly associated with an action plan. Moreover, the ERP results revealed that during the selection task, future action-relevant VWM-matching shapes elicited (1) a stronger Ppc (posterior positivity contralateral), signaling greater attentional saliency; (2) an earlier PD (distractor positivity) component, suggesting faster suppression; (3) a larger inverse (i.e., positive) sustained posterior contralateral negativity in incongruent trials, consistent with stronger suppression of action-associated distractors; and (4) an enhanced response-locked positivity over left motor regions, possibly indicating enhanced inhibition of the response associated with the memorized item during the interim task. Overall, these results suggest that action planning renders objects in VWM more attentionally salient, supporting the notion of selection-for-action in working memory.
大量研究表明,视觉工作记忆(VWM)本质上是面向动作的。与这一观点一致,我们最近发现,当我们计划未来对这些物体进行操作时,注意力更容易受到 VWM 对物体的表示的影响。在这里,我们使用 EEG 和眼动追踪技术,研究了 VWM 和动作之间相互作用的神经生理学相关性。参与者(n=36)记住了一个形状,以备后续的 VWM 测试。在测试中,探针与辅助物体一起呈现。在动作条件下,如果探针与记忆中的形状匹配,参与者就会握住实际的探针,而在控制条件下,他们会握住辅助物体。至关重要的是,在 VWM 延迟期间,参与者进行了一项视觉选择任务,他们尽快找到目标。记忆中的形状可以环绕目标(一致试验)或分心物(不一致试验)。我们复制了先前的发现,发现目光偏向于与 VWM 匹配的形状,更重要的是,当形状与行动计划直接相关时,目光偏向更明显。此外,ERP 结果显示,在选择任务中,未来与动作相关的与 VWM 匹配的形状会引起:(1)更强的 Ppc(对侧后正),表示更高的注意力显著性;(2)更早的 PD(分心物正)成分,表明更快的抑制;(3)在不一致试验中,更大的反向(即正)持续对侧后负性,与对与动作相关的分心物更强的抑制一致;(4)在左运动区域中增强的反应锁定正性,可能表示在中间任务中对记忆项目相关反应的抑制增强。总体而言,这些结果表明,动作计划使 VWM 中的物体更具注意力显著性,支持了工作记忆中选择行动的观点。