• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术术后漏:危险因素的 2024 年更新。

Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: 2024 update on risk factors.

机构信息

Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, 'La Sapienza' University of Rome-Polo Pontino, Bariatric Centre of Excellence SICOB, Latina, Italy.

Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Division of General Surgery and Bariatric Center of Excellence SICOB, Referral Training Center of ISHAWS (Italian Chapter EHS), 'La Sapienza' University of Rome, Roma, Italy.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Aug 13;409(1):249. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03424-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-024-03424-7
PMID:39136791
Abstract

PURPOSE

Leaks after sleeve gastrectomy remain a deadly complication significantly affecting outcomes and medical costs. The aim of the present review is to provide an updated decalogue on leak prevention.

METHODS

Risk factors of leakage after LSG were examined based on an extensive review of literature (in period time 2016-2024) and summary of evidence was provided using Oxford levels of evidence scale.

RESULTS

Pathogenesis of leakage after LSG still remain related to ischemic and mechanical factors and, therefore, no new evidence has been reported. Conversely, some technical aspect of the procedure has changed: bougie size, antrum resection, staple line reinforcement, and intraoperative leak testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Bougie size 36 F is effective and safe achieving similar leakage rate compared to larger bougie sizes (EL:2) 2024 UPDATE; There is no significant difference in the leak rate between restrictive (< 6 cm) and conservative (6 cm) antrum resection (EL: 1) 2024 UPDATE; Surgical experience and case volume affect the leak rate more consistently than every kind of SLR (EL: 2) 2024 UPDATE; Intraoperative leak test after LSG represents a decision based on surgeon preference in absence of standardization (endoscopy, bubble test, methylene blue, indocyanine green.) and strong detection/prevention rate (EL: 3) 2024 UPDATE.

摘要

目的

袖状胃切除术后的漏液仍然是一种致命的并发症,严重影响手术结果和医疗费用。本综述的目的在于提供一套最新的关于预防漏液的十项建议。

方法

基于对文献(2016-2024 年期间)的广泛回顾,检查了 LSG 后漏液的危险因素,并使用牛津证据等级量表提供了证据总结。

结果

LSG 后漏液的发病机制仍与缺血和机械因素有关,因此没有新的证据报道。相反,该手术的一些技术方面已经发生了变化:胃管大小、胃窦切除、吻合口加固和术中漏液检测。

结论

36F 号胃管是有效且安全的,其漏液发生率与更大号胃管(EL:2)相似;限制型(<6cm)和保守型(6cm)胃窦切除的漏液发生率无显著差异(EL: 1);手术经验和病例量比任何一种 SLR 更能一致地影响漏液率(EL: 2);LSG 后的术中漏液检测是基于外科医生的偏好,目前尚未标准化(内镜、气泡试验、亚甲蓝、吲哚菁绿),检测/预防率较高(EL: 3)。

相似文献

1
Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: 2024 update on risk factors.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术术后漏:危险因素的 2024 年更新。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Aug 13;409(1):249. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03424-7.
2
Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: overview of pathogenesis and risk factors.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后的渗漏:发病机制与危险因素概述
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Sep;401(6):757-66. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1464-6. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
3
Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in four staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review.四种吻合口加固方式下腹腔镜袖状胃切除术漏率的比较:一项系统评价
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Jul-Aug;10(4):713-23. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
4
Evaluating the effect of operative technique on leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a case-control study.评估手术技术对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后渗漏的影响:一项病例对照研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Apr;13(4):560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.027. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
5
Intraoperative leak testing has no correlation with leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后,术中渗漏检测与术后渗漏并无关联。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):883-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4286-7. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
6
Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review.五种缝钉线加固方案在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中漏率的比较:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):396-407. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06782-2. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
7
Current role of staple line reinforcement in 30-day outcomes of primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of MBSAQIP data, 2015-2016 PUF.2015-2016 年 MBSAQIP 数据 PUF 分析:缝线加固在原发性腹腔镜袖状胃切除术 30 天结果中的当前作用。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Oct;14(10):1454-1461. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.06.024. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
8
Surgical strategies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 cases.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术术后漏的可能减少的手术策略:9991 例的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2013 Feb;257(2):231-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826cc714.
9
Endoscopic Therapy for Treatment of Staple Line Leaks Post-Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG): Experience from a Large Bariatric Surgery Centre in New Zealand.内镜治疗腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)后吻合口漏:来自新西兰一家大型减肥手术中心的经验
Obes Surg. 2016 Jun;26(6):1155-62. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1931-0.
10
Gastric leaks post sleeve gastrectomy: review of its prevention and management.袖状胃切除术后胃漏:预防与处理综述
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 14;20(38):13904-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13904.

引用本文的文献

1
Technical variability and safety of sleeve gastrectomy: a nationwide survey of bariatric centers in Poland.袖状胃切除术的技术变异性与安全性:波兰肥胖症治疗中心的全国性调查。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2025 May 28;20(2):209-214. doi: 10.20452/wiitm.2025.17954. eCollection 2025 Jul 8.
2
Evaluation of complete gastric staple line bioabsorbable reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score matched analysis.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中完全胃吻合钉线生物可吸收加固的评估:倾向评分匹配分析
Updates Surg. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02326-7.
3
Staple line leakage after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Japan: a nationwide survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Customized bariatric stents for sleeve gastrectomy leak: are they superior to conventional esophageal stents? A systematic review and proportion meta-analysis.定制减重支架治疗胃袖状切除术漏:它们优于传统食管支架吗?系统评价和比例荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1025-1038. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08147-6. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
2
Clinical and economic burden of colorectal and bariatric anastomotic leaks.结直肠和减重吻合口漏的临床和经济负担。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Oct;34(10):4374-4381. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07210-1. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
3
Gastric leaks post sleeve gastrectomy: review of its prevention and management.
日本腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后吻合口漏的全国性调查。
Surg Today. 2025 May 14. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03057-3.
袖状胃切除术后胃漏:预防与处理综述
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 14;20(38):13904-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13904.