Sustained submaximal isometric wrist flexion and wrist extension contractions uniquely impair maximal voluntary contraction force in the antagonist wrist action.

When fatigued, the wrist extensors, which are the primary wrist stabilizers, impair distal upper limb motor performance in a surprisingly similar way as when fatiguing the wrist flexors. It is possible that the wrist extensors are so active as antagonists that they develop an equal degree of fatigue during wrist flexion contractions, making it difficult to truly isolate their impact on performance. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine how wrist flexion/extension forces are impaired following either agonist or antagonist sustained submaximal wrist contractions. 13 male participants attended four laboratory sessions. In these sessions, fatigue was induced via a sustained submaximal isometric contraction of either wrist flexion or extension. These contractions were held for up to 10 min at 20% of the participant's baseline maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force. Throughout the sustained contraction, intermittent agonist (matching the sustained contraction) or antagonist (opposing the sustained contraction) MVCs were performed. Unsurprisingly, agonist MVC forces decreased significantly more than antagonist (Agonist: 58.5%, Antagonist: 86.5% of MVC, P < 0.001). However, while there were no differences in antagonist wrist extension and flexion MVC decreases (Wrist Flexion: 87.5%, Wrist Extension: 85.5%, P = 0.41), wrist extension MVCs did decrease significantly more than wrist flexion MVCs when forces were expressed relative to the agonist (P = 0.036). These findings partially support the hypothesis that the wrist extensors may be more susceptible to developing fatigue when functioning as antagonists than the wrist flexors. This work will help equip future research into the motor control of the upper limb and the prevention of forearm-related musculoskeletal disorders.