Bayesian network analysis of risk classification strategies in the regulation of cellular products.

Cell therapy, a burgeoning therapeutic strategy, necessitates a scientific regulatory framework but faces challenges in risk-based regulation due to the lack of a global consensus on risk classification. This study applies Bayesian network analysis to compare and evaluate the risk classification strategies for cellular products proposed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), and World Health Organization (WHO), using real-world data to validate the models. The appropriateness of key risk factors is assessed within the three regulatory frameworks, along with their implications for clinical safety. The results indicate several directions for refining risk classification approaches. Additionally, a substudy focuses on a specific type of cell and gene therapy (CGT), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. It underscores the importance of considering CAR targets, tumor types, and costimulatory domains when assessing the safety risks of CAR T cell products. Overall, there is currently a lack of a regulatory framework based on real-world data for cellular products and a lack of risk-based classification review methods. This study aims to improve the regulatory system for cellular products, emphasizing risk-based classification. Furthermore, the study advocates for leveraging machine learning in regulatory science to enhance the assessment of cellular product safety, illustrating the role of Bayesian networks in aiding regulatory decision-making for the risk classification of cellular products.