Suppr超能文献

儿童经 Heliox 持续输送沙丁胺醇的台架模型。

A Pediatric Bench Model of Continuous Albuterol Delivery Using Heliox.

机构信息

Department of Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Division of Respiratory Care, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois.

Department of Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Division of Respiratory Care, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois; and Department of Respiratory Care, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2024 Nov 18;69(12):1517-1522. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11713.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal setup for continuously administering albuterol with heliox remains unclear, especially for pediatric patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of continuous albuterol delivery with heliox using different nebulizer setups in a pediatric model.

METHODS

A pediatric manikin with simulated spontaneous breathing was used to receive continuous albuterol (20 mg/h) with heliox (80/20) in 3 setups: (1) The MiniHEART nebulizer, driven by oxygen at 3 L/min, was attached to a Y-piece, linking to a non-rebreather mask and a valved reservoir with 11 L/min heliox; (2) a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) placed at the humidifier inlet of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) with 11 L/min heliox and the manikin's mouth sealed; and (3) a VMN placed between a valved reservoir with 11 L/min heliox and a non-rebreather mask. Both tight-fitting and loose-fitting mask configurations were tested in the setup with vibrating mesh nebulizer and mask. Heliox of 70/30 was tested with a VMN and a loose-fitting mask. Albuterol was delivered continuously to the nebulizer via an infusion pump at 8 mL (20 mg)/h for each 20-min run and each experiment was repeated five times. A collecting filter placed between the manikin's trachea and lung model was removed after each run, and the drug was eluted and assayed via ultraviolet spectrophotometry (276 nm).

RESULTS

During continuous albuterol nebulization using heliox, the VMN either in line with HFNC or with a tight-fitting mask achieved the highest and similar inhaled dose (8.5 ± 0.4 vs 8.8 ± 0.7%, = .35), while the MiniHEART nebulizer yielded the lowest aerosol deposition (1.5 ± 0.2%). The inhaled dose was lower with the loose-fitting mask than with the tight-fitting mask (5.9 ± 0.9 vs 8.8 ± 0.7%, =.009), and heliox of 80/20 delivered a higher inhaled dose than heliox of 70/30 (5.9 ± 0.9 vs 3.9 ± 0.4%, = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

When administering continuous albuterol with heliox in a pediatric model, utilizing a VMN in line with HFNC during closed-mouth breathing yielded a higher inhaled dose compared to both the MiniHEART nebulizer and VMN with a loose-fitting mask.

摘要

背景

使用氦氧混合气持续给予沙丁胺醇的最佳设置仍不清楚,特别是对于儿科患者。本研究旨在评估在儿科模型中使用不同雾化器设置连续给予沙丁胺醇和氦氧混合气的效率。

方法

使用具有模拟自主呼吸的儿科人体模型,以 3 种设置接收连续沙丁胺醇(20mg/h)和氦氧混合气(80/20):(1)MiniHEART 雾化器由 3L/min 的氧气驱动,连接 Y 型件,连接到无重复呼吸面罩和带有 11L/min 氦氧混合气的活瓣储雾器;(2)放置在高流量鼻导管(HFNC)加湿器入口处的振动网雾化器(VMN),并密封人体模型的嘴,同时使用 11L/min 的氦氧混合气;(3)将 VMN 放置在带有 11L/min 氦氧混合气的活瓣储雾器和无重复呼吸面罩之间。在 VMN 和面罩设置中测试了紧密贴合和宽松贴合的面罩配置。在 VMN 和宽松贴合的面罩中测试了 70/30 的氦氧混合气。通过输液泵以 8mL(20mg)/h 的速度将沙丁胺醇连续输送至雾化器,每次 20 分钟运行一次,每个实验重复 5 次。每次运行后,从人体模型的气管和肺模型之间取出收集过滤器,并通过紫外分光光度法(276nm)洗脱和检测药物。

结果

在使用氦氧混合气进行连续沙丁胺醇雾化时,与 HFNC 或与紧密贴合面罩相连的 VMN 均实现了最高且相似的吸入剂量(8.5±0.4%与 8.8±0.7%, =.35),而 MiniHEART 雾化器的气溶胶沉积最低(1.5±0.2%)。与紧密贴合面罩相比,宽松贴合面罩的吸入剂量较低(5.9±0.9%与 8.8±0.7%, =.009),并且 80/20 氦氧混合气的吸入剂量高于 70/30 氦氧混合气(5.9±0.9%与 3.9±0.4%, =.009)。

结论

在儿科模型中使用氦氧混合气连续给予沙丁胺醇时,与 MiniHEART 雾化器和宽松贴合面罩的 VMN 相比,在闭气呼吸期间使用与 HFNC 相连的 VMN 可获得更高的吸入剂量。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验