Aquah Grace Esu-Ejemot, Niblett Daniel, Shokri Javad, Niasar Vahid
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 13;14(1):18812. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68681-4.
This study utilises computational fluid dynamics simulations with the OpenFOAM computational framework to investigate and compare the in-plane and through-plane permeability properties of four different gas diffusion layers (GDLs). Also the through-plane water and air relative permeability values and water saturations at different rates were simulated. Permeability analysis enhances our understanding of fluid flow, ways to decrease pressure loss in the GDL, and methods to enhance oxygen concentration at the catalyst layer interface through convection. The analysis reveals that the investigated GDL materials have spatial heterogeneity of porosity and permeability, especially in the Sigracet SGL 25 BA GDL. However, the porosity and permeability of the Toray TGP-H 060 and AvCarb 370 MGL GDLs exhibit less variations. The two-phase flow studies on GDL saturation show that at the same water injection flowrate, the AvCarb 370 MGL GDL has the largest remaining water saturation, with Sigracet SGL 25 BA GDL being the less saturated GDL among the four investigated GDLs. The compression from the ribs significantly affected the in-plane permeabilities of both Toray TGP-H 060 and especially impacted Sigracet SGL 25 BA GDL. This impact was expected as the pore size distribution varied significantly in the areas under the ribs versus the channel.
本研究利用OpenFOAM计算框架进行计算流体动力学模拟,以研究和比较四种不同气体扩散层(GDL)的面内渗透率和贯穿面渗透率特性。此外,还模拟了不同速率下的贯穿面水和气相对渗透率值以及水饱和度。渗透率分析有助于我们理解流体流动、降低GDL中压力损失的方法,以及通过对流提高催化剂层界面处氧气浓度的方法。分析表明,所研究的GDL材料在孔隙率和渗透率方面存在空间异质性,尤其是在Sigracet SGL 25 BA GDL中。然而,东丽TGP-H 060和AvCarb 370 MGL GDL的孔隙率和渗透率变化较小。对GDL饱和度的两相流研究表明,在相同的注水流量下,AvCarb 370 MGL GDL的剩余水饱和度最大,而Sigracet SGL 25 BA GDL是所研究的四种GDL中饱和度较低的GDL。肋条的压缩对东丽TGP-H 060的面内渗透率有显著影响,对Sigracet SGL 25 BA GDL的影响尤为明显。由于肋条下方区域与通道内的孔径分布差异显著,这种影响是预期的。