• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣植入术后血管并发症的发生率和预测因素:MANTA 和缝线式血管闭合装置的比较。

Incidence and predictors of vascular complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A comparison of the MANTA and suture-based vascular closure devices.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Cardiology, Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Oct;104(4):812-819. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31185. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.31185
PMID:39138822
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vascular complications post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are common. Recent data regarding predictors of vascular complications are limited, particularly comparing newer plug-based devices versus traditional suture-based vascular closure devices (VCD).

AIM

The primary objective was to identify characteristics that predict a higher risk of vascular complications in TAVI patients, as judged by the VARC-3 criteria, specifically comparing risk factors between suture-based vs MANTA device closure.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent TAVI between December 2019 and September 2023 was performed. Logistic regression and propensity score matching was performed to ascertain risk factors for vascular complications post-TAVI.

RESULTS

Of the 1763 patients, there were 106 vascular complications (6%). There was a nonsignificant increased complication rate in MANTA vs suture-based device closure (8.3% vs 5.3%, p = 0.064). Among these, the most common complications were VCD failure (23%), pseudoaneurysm (20%) and arterial dissection (19%). Obesity (p = 0.021), anemia (p = 0.039) and MANTA device use (p = 0.027) were predictors of vascular complications. Within the MANTA cohort, novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) use was predictive of vascular complications (p = 0.002). Among suture-based devices, obesity (p = 0.037) and anaemia (p = 0.017) were significant predictors. A propensity matched analysis derived 90 pairs of patients matched for age, gender, diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, NOAC use, anemia and obesity, identifying an average treatment effect of 0.039 (p = 0.04) when MANTA device closure was performed.

CONCLUSION

Vascular complications in TAVI remain common. Identifying predictors such as MANTA device closure, obesity, anemia, and baseline NOAC use will allow for improved risk stratification and appropriate VCD selection in patients undergoing TAVI.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)后血管并发症很常见。关于血管并发症预测因素的最新数据有限,特别是比较新型的基于塞子的设备与传统的基于缝合的血管闭合装置(VCD)。

目的

主要目的是根据 VARC-3 标准确定 TAVI 患者发生血管并发症的风险较高的特征,特别是比较基于缝合与 MANTA 装置闭合的风险因素。

方法

对 2019 年 12 月至 2023 年 9 月期间接受 TAVI 的患者进行回顾性分析。采用逻辑回归和倾向评分匹配来确定 TAVI 后血管并发症的危险因素。

结果

在 1763 例患者中,有 106 例发生血管并发症(6%)。MANTA 与基于缝合的装置相比,并发症发生率无显著增加(8.3% vs 5.3%,p=0.064)。在这些并发症中,最常见的是 VCD 失败(23%)、假性动脉瘤(20%)和动脉夹层(19%)。肥胖症(p=0.021)、贫血(p=0.039)和 MANTA 装置的使用(p=0.027)是血管并发症的预测因素。在 MANTA 组中,新型口服抗凝剂(NOAC)的使用与血管并发症相关(p=0.002)。在基于缝合的装置中,肥胖症(p=0.037)和贫血(p=0.017)是显著的预测因素。通过倾向评分匹配分析得出了 90 对年龄、性别、糖尿病、外周动脉疾病、NOAC 使用、贫血和肥胖匹配的患者,当使用 MANTA 装置闭合时,平均治疗效果为 0.039(p=0.04)。

结论

TAVI 后的血管并发症仍然很常见。识别 MANTA 装置闭合、肥胖症、贫血和基线时使用 NOAC 等预测因素,将有助于对接受 TAVI 的患者进行更好的风险分层和适当的 VCD 选择。

相似文献

1
Incidence and predictors of vascular complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A comparison of the MANTA and suture-based vascular closure devices.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后血管并发症的发生率和预测因素:MANTA 和缝线式血管闭合装置的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Oct;104(4):812-819. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31185. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
2
Comparison of MANTA versus Perclose Prostyle large-bore vascular closure devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.比较 MANTA 与 Perclose Prostyle 大口径血管闭合装置在经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的应用。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan;103(1):160-168. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30921. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
3
Propensity-matched comparison of large-bore access closure in transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus Perclose: A real-world experience.使用 MANTA 和 Perclose 进行经导管主动脉瓣置换术大口径入路闭合的倾向评分匹配比较:真实世界经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep;98(3):580-585. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29786. Epub 2021 May 29.
4
A propensity-matched comparison of plug- versus suture-based vascular closure after TAVI.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后基于封堵器与缝线的血管闭合的倾向匹配比较。
EuroIntervention. 2025 Mar 3;21(5):e272-e281. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00120.
5
Early Outcomes After Percutaneous Closure of Access Site in Transfemoral Transcatheter Valve Implantation Using the Novel Vascular Closure Device Collagen Plug-Based MANTA.使用新型血管闭合装置胶原塞基 MANTA 经股动脉经导管瓣膜植入术后经皮闭合入路的早期结果。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 15;124(8):1265-1271. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.030. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
6
Manta versus Perclose ProGlide vascular closure device after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Initial experience from a large European center.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后使用Manta与Perclose ProGlide血管闭合装置的比较:来自欧洲大型中心的初步经验。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Apr;37:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.06.134. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
7
Clinical outcomes of MANTA vs suture-based vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: An updated meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 MANTA 与缝线式血管闭合装置的临床结局:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Indian Heart J. 2023 Jan-Feb;75(1):59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
8
Single suture-mediated closure system after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A single-center real-world experience.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术后单缝线介导闭合系统:单中心真实世界经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jun;103(7):1125-1137. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31054. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
9
Percutaneous plug-based vascular closure device in 1000 consecutive transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantations.在连续1000例经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术中使用基于封堵器的经皮血管闭合装置。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Jul 15;359:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.04.033. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
10
ProGlide-AngioSeal versus ProGlide-FemoSeal for vascular access hemostasis posttranscatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后血管入路止血中 ProGlide-AngioSeal 与 ProGlide-FemoSeal 的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Nov;104(6):1251-1259. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31259. Epub 2024 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous Cannulation for Minimally Invasive Heart Valve Surgery: Results from a Multicenter Registry.经皮插管在微创心脏瓣膜手术中的应用:多中心注册研究结果
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Jul 1;67(7). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaf219.