Suppr超能文献

与标准护理相比,专科虚拟病房中远程医疗辅助的急性心力衰竭门诊管理。

Telehealth-aided outpatient management of acute heart failure in a specialist virtual ward compared with standard care.

作者信息

Sankaranarayanan Rajiv, Rasoul Debar, Murphy Naomi, Kelly AnneMarie, Nyjo Siji, Jackson Carolyn, O'Connor Jane, Almond Peter, Jose Nisha, West Jenni, Kaur Rosie, Oguguo Chukwemeka, Douglas Homeyra, Lip Gregory Y H

机构信息

Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Aintree Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science at University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Dec;11(6):4172-4184. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15003. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this propensity score matched cohort study was to assess the outcomes of telehealth-guided outpatient management of acute heart failure (HF) in our virtual ward (HFVW) compared with hospitalized acute HF patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This cohort study (May 2022-October 2023) assessed outcomes of telehealth-guided outpatient acute HF management using bolus intravenous furosemide in a HF-specialist VW. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed using logistic regression to adjust for potential differences in baseline patient characteristics between HFVW and standard care [Get With The Guidelines-HF score, clinical frailty score (CFS), Charlson co-morbidity index (CCI), NT-proBNP, and ejection fraction]. Clinical outcomes (re-hospitalizations and mortality) were compared at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months versus standard care-SC (acute HF patients managed without telehealth in 2021). Five hundred fifty-four HFVW ADHF patients (age 73.1 ± 10.9 years; 46% female) were compared with 404 ADHF patients (74.2 ± 11.8; P = 0.15 and 49% female) in the standard care-SC cohort. After propensity score matching for baseline patient characteristics, re-hospitalizations were significantly lower in the HFVW compared with SC (1 month-HFVW 8.6% vs. SC-21.5%, P < 0.001; 3 months-21% vs. 30%, P = 0.003; 6 months-28% vs 41%, P < 0.001 and 12 months-47% vs. 57%, P = 0.005) and mortality was also lower at 1 month (5% vs. 13.7%; P < 0.001), 3 months (9.5% vs. 15%; P = 0.001), 6 months (15% vs. 21%; P = 0.03), and 12 months (20% vs. 26%; P = 0.04). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that compared with standard care, HFVW management was associated with lower odds of readmission (1-month odds ratio (OR) = 0.3 [95% Confidence Interval CI 0.2-0.5], P < 0.0001; 3 month OR = 0.15 [0.1-0.3], P < 0.0001; 6-month OR = 0.35 [0.2-0.6], P = 0.0002; 12-month OR = 0.25 [0.15-0.4], P ≤ 0.001 and mortality (1-month OR = 0.26 [0.14-0.48], P < 0.0001; 3-month OR = 0.11 [0.04-0.27], P < 0.0001; 6-month OR = 0.35, [0.2; 0.61], P = 0.0002; 12-month OR = 0.6 [0.48; 0.73], P = 0.03. Higher GWTG-HF score independently predicted increased odds of re-hospitalization (1-month OR = 1.2 [1.1-1.3], P < 0.001; 3-month OR = 1.5 [1.37; 1.64], P < 0.0001; 6-month OR = 1.3 [1.2-1.4], P < 0.0001; 12-month OR = 1.1 [1.05-1.2], P = 0.03) as well as mortality (1-month OR = 1.21 [1.1-1.3], P < 0.0001; 3-month OR = 1.3 [1.2-1.4], P < 0.0001; 6-month OR = 1.2 [1.1-1.3], P < 0.0001; 12-month OR = 1.3 [1.1-1.7], P = 0.02). Similarly higher CFS also independently predicted increased odds of re-hospitalizations (1-month OR = 1.9 [1.5-2.4], P < 0.0001; 3-month OR = 1.8 [1.3-2.4], P = 0.0003; 6-month OR = 1.4 [1.1-1.8], P = 0.015; 12-month OR 1.9 [1.2-3], P = 0.01]) and mortality (1-month OR = 2.1 [1.6-2.8], P < 0.0001; 3-month OR = 1.8 [1.2-2.6], P = 0.006; 6-month OR = 2.34 [1.51-5.6], P = 0.0001; 12-month OR = 2.6 [1.6-7], P = 0.02). Increased daily step count while on HFVW independently predicted reduced odds of re-hospitalizations (1-month OR = 0.85[0.7-0.9], P = 0.005), 3-month OR = 0.95 [0.93-0.98], P = 0.003 and 1-month mortality (OR = 0.85 [0.7-0.95], P = 0.01), whereas CCI predicted adverse 12-month outcomes (OR = 1.2 [1.1-1.4], P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Telehealth-guided specialist HFVW management for ADHF may offer a safe and efficacious alternative to hospitalization in suitable patients. Daily step count in HFVW can help predict risk of short-term adverse clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

本倾向评分匹配队列研究旨在评估在我们的虚拟病房(HFVW)中,远程医疗指导下的急性心力衰竭(HF)门诊管理与住院急性HF患者相比的结局。

方法与结果

本队列研究(2022年5月至2023年10月)评估了在HF专科虚拟病房中使用静脉推注速尿进行远程医疗指导的门诊急性HF管理的结局。使用逻辑回归进行倾向评分匹配(PSM),以调整HFVW与标准治疗[遵循指南-HF评分、临床衰弱评分(CFS)、Charlson合并症指数(CCI)、NT-proBNP和射血分数]之间基线患者特征的潜在差异。比较了1、3、6和12个月时的临床结局(再住院和死亡率)与标准治疗-SC(2021年未接受远程医疗管理的急性HF患者)。554例HFVW急性失代偿性HF患者(年龄73.1±10.9岁;46%为女性)与标准治疗-SC队列中的404例急性失代偿性HF患者(74.2±11.8;P = 0.15,49%为女性)进行比较。在对基线患者特征进行倾向评分匹配后,HFVW的再住院率显著低于SC(1个月-HFVW为8.6%,SC为21.5%,P < 0.001;3个月-21%对30%,P = 0.003;6个月-28%对41%,P < 0.001;12个月-47%对57%,P = 0.005),1个月时的死亡率也较低(5%对13.7%;P < 0.001),3个月时(9.5%对15%;P = 0.001),6个月时(15%对21%;P = 0.03),12个月时(20%对26%;P = 0.04)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,与标准治疗相比,HFVW管理与再入院几率较低相关(1个月优势比(OR)= 0.3 [95%置信区间CI 0.2 - 0.5],P < 0.0001;3个月OR = 0.15 [0.1 - 0.3],P < 0.0001;6个月OR = 0.35 [0.2 - 0.6],P = 0.0002;12个月OR = 0.25 [0.15 - 0.4],P ≤ 0.001)和死亡率(1个月OR = 0.26 [0.14 - 0.48],P < 0.0001;3个月OR = 0.11 [0.04 - 0.27],P < 0.0001;6个月OR = 0.35,[0.2;0.61],P = 0.0002;12个月OR = 0.6 [0.48;0.73],P = 0.03)。较高的GWTG-HF评分独立预测再住院几率增加(1个月OR = 1.2 [1.1 - 1.3],P < 0.001;3个月OR = 1.5 [1.37;1.64],P < 0.0001;6个月OR = 1.3 [1.2 - 1.4],P < 0.0001;12个月OR = 1.1 [1.05 - 1.2],P = 0.03)以及死亡率(1个月OR = 1.21 [1.1 - 1.3],P < 0.0001;3个月OR = 1.3 [1.2 - 1.4],P < 0.0001;6个月OR = 1.2 [1.1 - 1.3],P < 0.0001;12个月OR = 1.3 [1.1 - 1.7],P = 0.02)。同样,较高的CFS也独立预测再住院几率增加(1个月OR = 1.9 [1.5 - 2.4],P < 0.0001;3个月OR = 1.8 [1.3 - 2.4],P = 0.0003;6个月OR = 1.4 [1.1 - 1.8],P = 0.015;12个月OR = 1.9 [1.2 - 3],P = 0.01])和死亡率(1个月OR = 2.1 [1.6 - 2.8],P < 0.0001;3个月OR = 1.8 [1.2 - 2.6],P = 0.006;6个月OR = 2.34 [1.51 - 5.6],P = 0.0001;12个月OR = 2.6 [1.6 - 7],P = 0.02)。在HFVW期间每日步数增加独立预测再住院几率降低(1个月OR = 0.85[0.7 - 0.9],P = 0.005),3个月OR = 0.95 [0.93 - 0.98],P = 0.003和1个月死亡率(OR = 0.85 [0.7 - 0.95],P = 0.01),而CCI预测12个月的不良结局(OR = 1.2 [1.1 - 1.4],P = 0.03)。

结论

对于急性失代偿性HF,远程医疗指导的专科HFVW管理可能为合适的患者提供一种安全有效的替代住院治疗的方法。HFVW中的每日步数有助于预测短期不良临床结局的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc42/11631251/dbc25442f2ba/EHF2-11-4172-g005.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验