• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与标准护理相比,专科虚拟病房中远程医疗辅助的急性心力衰竭门诊管理。

Telehealth-aided outpatient management of acute heart failure in a specialist virtual ward compared with standard care.

作者信息

Sankaranarayanan Rajiv, Rasoul Debar, Murphy Naomi, Kelly AnneMarie, Nyjo Siji, Jackson Carolyn, O'Connor Jane, Almond Peter, Jose Nisha, West Jenni, Kaur Rosie, Oguguo Chukwemeka, Douglas Homeyra, Lip Gregory Y H

机构信息

Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Aintree Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science at University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Dec;11(6):4172-4184. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15003. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1002/ehf2.15003
PMID:39138875
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11631251/
Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this propensity score matched cohort study was to assess the outcomes of telehealth-guided outpatient management of acute heart failure (HF) in our virtual ward (HFVW) compared with hospitalized acute HF patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This cohort study (May 2022-October 2023) assessed outcomes of telehealth-guided outpatient acute HF management using bolus intravenous furosemide in a HF-specialist VW. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed using logistic regression to adjust for potential differences in baseline patient characteristics between HFVW and standard care [Get With The Guidelines-HF score, clinical frailty score (CFS), Charlson co-morbidity index (CCI), NT-proBNP, and ejection fraction]. Clinical outcomes (re-hospitalizations and mortality) were compared at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months versus standard care-SC (acute HF patients managed without telehealth in 2021). Five hundred fifty-four HFVW ADHF patients (age 73.1 ± 10.9 years; 46% female) were compared with 404 ADHF patients (74.2 ± 11.8; P = 0.15 and 49% female) in the standard care-SC cohort. After propensity score matching for baseline patient characteristics, re-hospitalizations were significantly lower in the HFVW compared with SC (1 month-HFVW 8.6% vs. SC-21.5%, P < 0.001; 3 months-21% vs. 30%, P = 0.003; 6 months-28% vs 41%, P < 0.001 and 12 months-47% vs. 57%, P = 0.005) and mortality was also lower at 1 month (5% vs. 13.7%; P < 0.001), 3 months (9.5% vs. 15%; P = 0.001), 6 months (15% vs. 21%; P = 0.03), and 12 months (20% vs. 26%; P = 0.04). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that compared with standard care, HFVW management was associated with lower odds of readmission (1-month odds ratio (OR) = 0.3 [95% Confidence Interval CI 0.2-0.5], P < 0.0001; 3 month OR = 0.15 [0.1-0.3], P < 0.0001; 6-month OR = 0.35 [0.2-0.6], P = 0.0002; 12-month OR = 0.25 [0.15-0.4], P ≤ 0.001 and mortality (1-month OR = 0.26 [0.14-0.48], P < 0.0001; 3-month OR = 0.11 [0.04-0.27], P < 0.0001; 6-month OR = 0.35, [0.2; 0.61], P = 0.0002; 12-month OR = 0.6 [0.48; 0.73], P = 0.03. Higher GWTG-HF score independently predicted increased odds of re-hospitalization (1-month OR = 1.2 [1.1-1.3], P < 0.001; 3-month OR = 1.5 [1.37; 1.64], P < 0.0001; 6-month OR = 1.3 [1.2-1.4], P < 0.0001; 12-month OR = 1.1 [1.05-1.2], P = 0.03) as well as mortality (1-month OR = 1.21 [1.1-1.3], P < 0.0001; 3-month OR = 1.3 [1.2-1.4], P < 0.0001; 6-month OR = 1.2 [1.1-1.3], P < 0.0001; 12-month OR = 1.3 [1.1-1.7], P = 0.02). Similarly higher CFS also independently predicted increased odds of re-hospitalizations (1-month OR = 1.9 [1.5-2.4], P < 0.0001; 3-month OR = 1.8 [1.3-2.4], P = 0.0003; 6-month OR = 1.4 [1.1-1.8], P = 0.015; 12-month OR 1.9 [1.2-3], P = 0.01]) and mortality (1-month OR = 2.1 [1.6-2.8], P < 0.0001; 3-month OR = 1.8 [1.2-2.6], P = 0.006; 6-month OR = 2.34 [1.51-5.6], P = 0.0001; 12-month OR = 2.6 [1.6-7], P = 0.02). Increased daily step count while on HFVW independently predicted reduced odds of re-hospitalizations (1-month OR = 0.85[0.7-0.9], P = 0.005), 3-month OR = 0.95 [0.93-0.98], P = 0.003 and 1-month mortality (OR = 0.85 [0.7-0.95], P = 0.01), whereas CCI predicted adverse 12-month outcomes (OR = 1.2 [1.1-1.4], P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Telehealth-guided specialist HFVW management for ADHF may offer a safe and efficacious alternative to hospitalization in suitable patients. Daily step count in HFVW can help predict risk of short-term adverse clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

本倾向评分匹配队列研究旨在评估在我们的虚拟病房(HFVW)中,远程医疗指导下的急性心力衰竭(HF)门诊管理与住院急性HF患者相比的结局。

方法与结果

本队列研究(2022年5月至2023年10月)评估了在HF专科虚拟病房中使用静脉推注速尿进行远程医疗指导的门诊急性HF管理的结局。使用逻辑回归进行倾向评分匹配(PSM),以调整HFVW与标准治疗[遵循指南-HF评分、临床衰弱评分(CFS)、Charlson合并症指数(CCI)、NT-proBNP和射血分数]之间基线患者特征的潜在差异。比较了1、3、6和12个月时的临床结局(再住院和死亡率)与标准治疗-SC(2021年未接受远程医疗管理的急性HF患者)。554例HFVW急性失代偿性HF患者(年龄73.1±10.9岁;46%为女性)与标准治疗-SC队列中的404例急性失代偿性HF患者(74.2±11.8;P = 0.15,49%为女性)进行比较。在对基线患者特征进行倾向评分匹配后,HFVW的再住院率显著低于SC(1个月-HFVW为8.6%,SC为21.5%,P < 0.001;3个月-21%对30%,P = 0.003;6个月-28%对41%,P < 0.001;12个月-47%对57%,P = 0.005),1个月时的死亡率也较低(5%对13.7%;P < 0.001),3个月时(9.5%对15%;P = 0.001),6个月时(15%对21%;P = 0.03),12个月时(20%对26%;P = 0.04)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,与标准治疗相比,HFVW管理与再入院几率较低相关(1个月优势比(OR)= 0.3 [95%置信区间CI 0.2 - 0.5],P < 0.0001;3个月OR = 0.15 [0.1 - 0.3],P < 0.0001;6个月OR = 0.35 [0.2 - 0.6],P = 0.0002;12个月OR = 0.25 [0.15 - 0.4],P ≤ 0.001)和死亡率(1个月OR = 0.26 [0.14 - 0.48],P < 0.0001;3个月OR = 0.11 [0.04 - 0.27],P < 0.0001;6个月OR = 0.35,[0.2;0.61],P = 0.0002;12个月OR = 0.6 [0.48;0.73],P = 0.03)。较高的GWTG-HF评分独立预测再住院几率增加(1个月OR = 1.2 [1.1 - 1.3],P < 0.001;3个月OR = 1.5 [1.37;1.64],P < 0.0001;6个月OR = 1.3 [1.2 - 1.4],P < 0.0001;12个月OR = 1.1 [1.05 - 1.2],P = 0.03)以及死亡率(1个月OR = 1.21 [1.1 - 1.3],P < 0.0001;3个月OR = 1.3 [1.2 - 1.4],P < 0.0001;6个月OR = 1.2 [1.1 - 1.3],P < 0.0001;12个月OR = 1.3 [1.1 - 1.7],P = 0.02)。同样,较高的CFS也独立预测再住院几率增加(1个月OR = 1.9 [1.5 - 2.4],P < 0.0001;3个月OR = 1.8 [1.3 - 2.4],P = 0.0003;6个月OR = 1.4 [1.1 - 1.8],P = 0.015;12个月OR = 1.9 [1.2 - 3],P = 0.01])和死亡率(1个月OR = 2.1 [1.6 - 2.8],P < 0.0001;3个月OR = 1.8 [1.2 - 2.6],P = 0.006;6个月OR = 2.34 [1.51 - 5.6],P = 0.0001;12个月OR = 2.6 [1.6 - 7],P = 0.02)。在HFVW期间每日步数增加独立预测再住院几率降低(1个月OR = 0.85[0.7 - 0.9],P = 0.005),3个月OR = 0.95 [0.93 - 0.98],P = 0.003和1个月死亡率(OR = 0.85 [0.7 - 0.95],P = 0.01),而CCI预测12个月的不良结局(OR = 1.2 [1.1 - 1.4],P = 0.03)。

结论

对于急性失代偿性HF,远程医疗指导的专科HFVW管理可能为合适的患者提供一种安全有效的替代住院治疗的方法。HFVW中的每日步数有助于预测短期不良临床结局的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc42/11631251/66953b14592f/EHF2-11-4172-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc42/11631251/dbc25442f2ba/EHF2-11-4172-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc42/11631251/10b498d47c77/EHF2-11-4172-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc42/11631251/2be703ea0477/EHF2-11-4172-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc42/11631251/eddb0a477faa/EHF2-11-4172-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc42/11631251/c3f138a0339b/EHF2-11-4172-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc42/11631251/66953b14592f/EHF2-11-4172-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc42/11631251/dbc25442f2ba/EHF2-11-4172-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc42/11631251/10b498d47c77/EHF2-11-4172-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc42/11631251/2be703ea0477/EHF2-11-4172-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc42/11631251/eddb0a477faa/EHF2-11-4172-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc42/11631251/c3f138a0339b/EHF2-11-4172-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc42/11631251/66953b14592f/EHF2-11-4172-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Telehealth-aided outpatient management of acute heart failure in a specialist virtual ward compared with standard care.与标准护理相比,专科虚拟病房中远程医疗辅助的急性心力衰竭门诊管理。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Dec;11(6):4172-4184. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15003. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
2
Comparative performance of risk prediction indices for mortality or readmission following heart failure hospitalization.心力衰竭住院后死亡率或再入院风险预测指数的比较性能
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Apr;12(2):1227-1236. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15129. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
3
Dose of furosemide before admission predicts diuretic efficiency and long-term prognosis in acute heart failure.入院前呋塞米剂量可预测急性心力衰竭患者的利尿效果和长期预后。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Feb;9(1):656-666. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13696. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
4
The ADHF/NT-proBNP risk score to predict 1-year mortality in hospitalized patients with advanced decompensated heart failure.ADHF/NT-proBNP 风险评分预测晚期失代偿性心力衰竭住院患者 1 年死亡率。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Apr;33(4):404-11. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
5
Effect of a Telemedicine Model on Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction in a Resource-Limited Setting in Vietnam: Cohort Study.越南资源有限环境下远程医疗模式对射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的影响:队列研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 19;27:e67228. doi: 10.2196/67228.
6
Design and baseline characteristics of SALT-HF trial: hypertonic saline therapy in ambulatory heart failure.SALT-HF 试验的设计和基线特征:门诊心力衰竭中高渗盐水治疗。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Jun;11(3):1767-1776. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14720. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
7
Weight telemonitoring of heart failure versus standard of care in a real-world setting: Results on mortality and hospitalizations in a 6-month nationwide matched cohort study.心力衰竭的体重远程监测与常规治疗在真实环境中的比较:一项全国性、6 个月匹配队列研究中对死亡率和住院率的结果。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 May;26(5):1201-1214. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3191. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
8
Hospitalization for Recently Diagnosed Versus Worsening Chronic Heart Failure: From the ASCEND-HF Trial.因新发诊断或恶化的慢性心力衰竭住院:来自 ASCEND-HF 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jun 27;69(25):3029-3039. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.043.
9
Torsemide vs Furosemide Among Patients With New-Onset vs Worsening Chronic Heart Failure: A Substudy of the TRANSFORM-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.托塞米与呋塞米在新发与恶化的慢性心力衰竭患者中的比较: TRANSFORM-HF 随机临床试验的亚研究。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Feb 1;9(2):182-188. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.4776.
10
Long-term results of intensified, N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide-guided versus symptom-guided treatment in elderly patients with heart failure: five-year follow-up from TIME-CHF.强化、N 末端 pro-B 型利钠肽指导与症状指导治疗老年心力衰竭患者的长期结果:TIME-CHF 的 5 年随访。
Circ Heart Fail. 2014 Jan;7(1):131-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000527. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to the use of virtual wards: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence.虚拟病房使用的障碍与促进因素:定性证据的系统评价
Int J Qual Health Care. 2025 Jul 4;37(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf065.
2
Hospital-at-Home care for acute heart failure: Feasibility and safety pilot.急性心力衰竭的居家医院护理:可行性与安全性试点研究
Neth Heart J. 2025 May;33(5):157-162. doi: 10.1007/s12471-025-01949-0. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
3
Economic evaluation of the Liverpool heart failure virtual ward model.利物浦心力衰竭虚拟病房模式的经济评估。

本文引用的文献

1
Remote management of worsening heart failure to avoid hospitalization in a real-world setting.在真实环境中远程管理心力衰竭恶化以避免住院。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Dec;10(6):3637-3645. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14553. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
2
Technology-enabled virtual ward for COVID management of the elderly and immunocompromised in Singapore: a descriptive cohort.新加坡利用技术实现的老年人和免疫功能低下者 COVID 管理虚拟病房:描述性队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 21;23(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08040-2.
3
Virtual wards: a rapid evidence synthesis and implications for the care of older people.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2025 Mar 3;11(2):197-205. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae095.
虚拟病房:快速证据综合分析及其对老年人护理的影响。
Age Ageing. 2023 Jan 8;52(1). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac319.
4
Outpatient versus inpatient intravenous diuretic therapy for heart failure in the United States.美国门诊与住院患者心力衰竭静脉利尿剂治疗对比
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Nov;24(11):2199-2202. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2727. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
5
Performance of the heart failure risk scores in predicting 1 year mortality and short-term readmission of patients.心力衰竭风险评分在预测患者 1 年死亡率和短期再入院率方面的表现。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;10(1):502-517. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14208. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
6
Multispecialty multidisciplinary input into comorbidities along with treatment optimisation in heart failure reduces hospitalisation and clinic attendance.多学科多专业共同参与心力衰竭的合并症治疗并优化治疗方案可减少住院和就诊次数。
Open Heart. 2022 Jul;9(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-001979.
7
The Impact of Frailty and Comorbidities on Heart Failure Outcomes.衰弱和共病对心力衰竭预后的影响。
Card Fail Rev. 2022 Mar 21;8:e07. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2021.29. eCollection 2022 Jan.
8
2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.2021 ESC 急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南:由欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断和治疗工作组制定。特别感谢欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会(HFA)的贡献。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Jan;24(1):4-131. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2333.
9
Ambulatory intravenous furosemide for decompensated heart failure: safe, feasible, and effective.门诊静脉注射呋塞米治疗失代偿性心力衰竭:安全、可行且有效。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;8(5):3906-3916. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13368. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
10
Hospital-at-Home Interventions vs In-Hospital Stay for Patients With Chronic Disease Who Present to the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.医院居家干预与慢性疾病患者急诊留观的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2111568. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11568.