• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人特应性皮炎和非特应性皮炎患者的过敏性接触性皮炎:西班牙接触性皮炎登记处(REIDAC)的评估。

Allergic contact dermatitis in adults with and without atopic dermatitis: Evaluation of the Spanish Contact Dermatitis Registry (REIDAC).

机构信息

Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.

Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 2024 Nov;91(5):404-411. doi: 10.1111/cod.14672. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1111/cod.14672
PMID:39138883
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) are inflammatory skin conditions whose association is not clearly defined.

OBJECTIVES

To identify differences in ACD profile between patients with and without AD among those referred for patch testing. Additionally, to determine the prevalence of sensitisation to standard Spanish contact allergens in both groups.

METHODS

We analysed two groups (AD and non-AD) within the Spanish Registry of Research in Contact Dermatitis and Cutaneous Allergy (REIDAC). Contact allergy, clinical relevance and epidemiological data were compared between them.

RESULTS

A total of 5055 patients were included. Among them, 23% (1168) had a history or final diagnosis of AD. At least one positive reaction was seen in 468 (40%) of AD patients and 1864 (48%) of non-AD patients. In both groups, the most common positive reactions were to nickel sulphate, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone and cobalt chloride. Age-adjusted OR for sensitisation to nickel sulphate was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.61-0.86), indicating a decreased likelihood of sensitisation in AD patients compared to non-AD individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find an increased presence of ACD in patients with AD referred for patch testing, exhibiting similar profiles to non-AD population, except for a negative relationship between AD and sensitisation to nickel sulphate.

摘要

背景

特应性皮炎(AD)和过敏性接触性皮炎(ACD)是两种炎症性皮肤疾病,其关联尚不清楚。

目的

在因斑贴试验而就诊的患者中,确定 AD 患者和非 AD 患者之间 ACD 特征的差异。此外,确定这两组患者对标准西班牙接触过敏原的致敏率。

方法

我们分析了西班牙接触性皮炎和皮肤过敏研究登记处(REIDAC)中的两个组(AD 和非 AD)。比较了两组之间的接触过敏、临床相关性和流行病学数据。

结果

共纳入 5055 例患者。其中,23%(1168 例)有 AD 病史或最终诊断。AD 患者中有 468 例(40%)至少有 1 项阳性反应,而非 AD 患者中有 1864 例(48%)。在两组中,最常见的阳性反应均为硫酸镍、甲基氯异噻唑啉酮/甲基异噻唑啉酮和氯化钴。调整年龄后,AD 患者对硫酸镍的致敏比值比(OR)为 0.72(95%CI:0.61-0.86),表明与非 AD 个体相比,AD 患者致敏的可能性较低。

结论

我们没有发现因斑贴试验而就诊的 AD 患者中 ACD 的存在增加,其特征与非 AD 人群相似,只是 AD 与对硫酸镍的致敏之间存在负相关。

相似文献

1
Allergic contact dermatitis in adults with and without atopic dermatitis: Evaluation of the Spanish Contact Dermatitis Registry (REIDAC).成人特应性皮炎和非特应性皮炎患者的过敏性接触性皮炎:西班牙接触性皮炎登记处(REIDAC)的评估。
Contact Dermatitis. 2024 Nov;91(5):404-411. doi: 10.1111/cod.14672. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
2
Epidemiological, Clinical, and Allergy Profile of Patients With Atopic Dermatitis and Hand Eczema: Evaluation of the Spanish Contact Dermatitis Registry (REIDAC).特应性皮炎和手部湿疹患者的流行病学、临床和过敏特征:西班牙接触性皮炎登记处(REIDAC)的评估。
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2022 Mar;113(3):236-243. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
3
[Translated article] Epidemiological, Clinical, and Allergic Profile of Psoriatic Patients. Evaluation of the Spanish Registry of Contact Dermatitis and Cutaneous Allergy (REIDAC).[翻译文章] 银屑病患者的流行病学、临床和过敏特征。评估西班牙接触性皮炎和皮肤过敏登记处 (REIDAC)。
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2024 Jun;115(6):T539-T546. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2024.04.013. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
4
Allergic contact dermatitis in atopic individuals: Results of a 30-year retrospective study.特应性个体的过敏性接触性皮炎:一项 30 年回顾性研究的结果。
Contact Dermatitis. 2019 Dec;81(6):409-416. doi: 10.1111/cod.13363. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
5
Prevalence and Trend of Allergen Sensitization in Adults and Children with Atopic Dermatitis Referred for Patch Testing, North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 2001-2016.2001-2016 年北美接触性皮炎组资料:特应性皮炎患者斑贴试验的变应原致敏情况及流行趋势分析(成人和儿童)
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Jul;9(7):2853-2866.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.03.028. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
6
Four-year Epidemiological Surveillance of the Spanish Registry of Research in Contact Dermatitis and Cutaneous Allergy: Current Situation and Trends.四年间西班牙接触性皮炎和皮肤过敏研究登记处的流行病学监测:现状与趋势。
7
Cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis.特应性皮炎患者的皮肤迟发型超敏反应。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Aug;69(2):232-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
8
Pediatric Contact Dermatitis Registry Data on Contact Allergy in Children With Atopic Dermatitis.特应性皮炎患儿接触性过敏的儿科接触性皮炎登记数据。
JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Aug 1;153(8):765-770. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.6136.
9
Contact allergy in children with and without atopic dermatitis: An Italian multicentre study.儿童特应性皮炎与非特应性皮炎患者的接触过敏情况:一项意大利多中心研究。
Contact Dermatitis. 2022 Sep;87(3):265-272. doi: 10.1111/cod.14130. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
10
Contact allergy in Danish children: Current trends.丹麦儿童的接触过敏:当前趋势。
Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Nov;79(5):295-302. doi: 10.1111/cod.13079. Epub 2018 Aug 9.