Jo Jung Ki, Seo Seong Il, Kang MinYong, Chung Jinsoo, Kwak Cheol, Hong Sung-Hoo, Song Cheryn, Park Jae Young, Jeong Chang Wook, Choi Seok Hwan, Kim Sung Han, Chang Hwang Eu, Lee Chan Ho, Lee Hakmin
Department of Urology, Medical and Digital Engineering, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Asian J Urol. 2024 Jul;11(3):450-459. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.11.004. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
The purpose of the study was to identify the best sequence of therapy beginning with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as the first-line therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and rates of discontinuation and adverse effects during the treatment period.
This is a retrospective, nationwide multicenter study of patients with mRCC after diagnosis at 10 different tertiary medical centers in Korea from January 1992 to December 2017. We focused on patients at either "favorable" or "intermediate" risk according to the International mRCC Database Consortium criteria, and they were followed up (median 335 days). Finally, a total of 1409 patients were selected as the study population. We generated a Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for covariates, and the different therapy schemes were statistically tested in terms of OS as well as PFS. In addition, frequencies of discontinuation and adverse events were compared among the therapy schemes.
Of the primary patterns of treatment sequences (24 sequences), "sunitinib-pazopanib" and "sunitinib-everolimus-immunotherapy" showed the most beneficial results in both OS and PFS with significantly lower hazards than "sunitinib", which is the most commonly treated agent in Korea. Considering that the "TKI-TKI" structure showed relatively higher discontinuation rates with higher adverse effects, the overall beneficial sequence would be "sunitinib-everolimus-immunotherapy".
Among several sequential therapy starting with TKIs, "sunitinib-everolimus- immunotherapy" was found to be the best scheme for mRCC patients with "favorable" or "intermediate" risks.
本研究旨在从总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)以及治疗期间的停药率和不良反应发生率方面,确定以酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)作为转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者一线治疗的最佳治疗顺序。
这是一项回顾性的全国多中心研究,研究对象为1992年1月至2017年12月在韩国10家不同的三级医疗中心确诊的mRCC患者。我们根据国际mRCC数据库联盟标准,重点关注“低危”或“中危”患者,并对其进行随访(中位随访335天)。最终,共1409例患者被选为研究人群。我们生成了一个经协变量调整的Cox比例风险模型,并对不同治疗方案的OS和PFS进行了统计学检验。此外,还比较了各治疗方案的停药频率和不良事件。
在主要的治疗顺序模式(24种顺序)中,“舒尼替尼-帕唑帕尼”和“舒尼替尼-依维莫司-免疫治疗”在OS和PFS方面均显示出最有益的结果,其风险显著低于韩国最常用的治疗药物“舒尼替尼”。考虑到“TKI-TKI”结构显示出相对较高的停药率和较高的不良反应,总体上最有益的顺序是“舒尼替尼-依维莫司-免疫治疗”。
在几种以TKI开始的序贯治疗中,“舒尼替尼-依维莫司-免疫治疗”被发现是“低危”或“中危”mRCC患者的最佳方案。