Oldham Jessie R, Howell David R, Lanois Corey J, Berkner Paul D, Iverson Grant L, Mannix Rebekah C, Meehan William P
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA.
Northeastern University, Boston, MA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2025 Jan 1;57(1):54-59. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003539. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
Our purpose was to represent a rare cohort of female collision sport athletes and investigate the association between sport type (collision, contact, and noncontact), symptoms, and performance on baseline neurocognitive assessments.
We conducted a cross-sectional study using baseline computerized neurocognitive scores (Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing [ImPACT]) of 75,128 female high school student-athletes (age, 15.27 ± 1.05 yr) playing multiple sports. The dependent variables were verbal memory, visual memory, visual motor speed, reaction time, and total symptom score. The independent variable was sport type, categorized as collision, contact, noncontact, adjusted for the effect of the following covariables: age, concussion history, and comorbidities (learning disability, ADHD, psychiatric condition, headaches, migraines, speech therapy, special education, and repeating one of more years of school) using multivariable regression models.
Female collision sport athletes reported significantly higher symptoms (9.81 ± 12.63) at baseline compared with contact (5.78 ± 9.25) or noncontact (6.39 ± 9.74) sport athletes ( P < 0.001). Using noncontact sports as a reference, there was no significant association between collision sport participation and cognitive composite scores (verbal memory: β = -0.57, 95% confidence interval = -1.80 to 0.66, P = 0.38; visual memory: β = -0.83, 95% confidence interval = -2.46 to 0.79, P = 0.31; visual motor speed: β = -0.21, 95% confidence interval = -1.01, 0.59, P = 0.61; reaction time: β = 0.01, 95% confidence interval = -0.01 to 0.02, P = 0.29).
Participation in collision sports appears to be associated with baseline symptoms but not neurocognitive functioning among female adolescent athletes.
我们的目的是呈现一组罕见的女性碰撞类运动项目运动员,并研究运动类型(碰撞类、接触类和非接触类)、症状以及基线神经认知评估表现之间的关联。
我们开展了一项横断面研究,使用了75128名参与多项运动的高中女运动员(年龄15.27±1.05岁)的基线计算机化神经认知评分(即时脑震荡评估和认知测试[ImPACT])。因变量为言语记忆、视觉记忆、视觉运动速度、反应时间和总症状评分。自变量为运动类型,分为碰撞类、接触类、非接触类,并使用多变量回归模型对以下协变量的影响进行了调整:年龄、脑震荡病史和合并症(学习障碍、注意力缺陷多动障碍、精神疾病、头痛、偏头痛、言语治疗、特殊教育以及留级一年或以上)。
与接触类(5.78±9.25)或非接触类(6.39±9.74)运动项目的运动员相比,女性碰撞类运动项目运动员在基线时报告的症状明显更高(9.81±12.63)(P<0.001)。以非接触类运动作为参照,碰撞类运动项目参与与认知综合评分之间无显著关联(言语记忆:β=-0.57,95%置信区间=-1.80至0.66,P=0.38;视觉记忆:β=-0.83,95%置信区间=-2.46至0.79,P=0.31;视觉运动速度:β=-0.21,95%置信区间=-1.01至0.59,P=0.61;反应时间:β=0.01,95%置信区间=-0.01至0.02,P=0.29)。
对于女性青少年运动员,参与碰撞类运动似乎与基线症状相关,但与神经认知功能无关。