Srinivasan Anisha P, Nishiguchi Erika Phelps, Gonzalez Cassandra, Jimenez Manuel E, Zuckerman Katharine E, Lion Katherine C
Division of Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
MIND Institute, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2024;45(6):e505-e512. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001312. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
To describe intake requirements among autism clinics and to assess how well intake paperwork aligns with national standards for enhancing language and literacy accessibility.
This was a survey of 126 autism clinics in the Children's Hospital Association, assessing intake processes and intake paperwork readability conducted between November 2021 and August 2022. Descriptive analyses characterized intake requirements and paperwork components. Free-text responses about intake support strategies were categorized into themes. Logistic regression models examined associations between clinic patient demographics and odds of requiring intake paperwork. Intake packet length, content, and reading grade level were examined.
Of the invited clinics, 73% completed the survey. Among the participating clinics, 55% required intake paperwork before scheduling appointments, 34% offered English forms only, and 89% had no plain language forms. Clinic patient demographics were not associated with intake paperwork requirements. Analyzed intake packets (n = 67) averaged 11 pages long, and most were written above the fifth-grade reading level. Most packets solicited medical, developmental, and educational/therapy history. Many also requested psychoeducational evaluations and teacher rating forms. Reported intake support strategies for families with language or literacy needs included making ad hoc exceptions to the usual process, task shifting to outside organizations, providing support at family's request, and delegating to support staff.
Many autism clinics nationwide require intake paperwork before diagnostic evaluation. Many clinics offer intake paperwork in English only, and paperwork often does not meet health literacy standards. Reducing paperwork requirements and providing more routine and robust intake support may facilitate equitable access to autism diagnostic evaluations.
描述自闭症诊所的接诊要求,并评估接诊文书与提高语言和读写能力可及性的国家标准的契合程度。
这是一项对儿童医院协会126家自闭症诊所的调查,评估了2021年11月至2022年8月期间的接诊流程和接诊文书的可读性。描述性分析对接诊要求和文书组成部分进行了特征描述。关于接诊支持策略的自由文本回复被归类为主题。逻辑回归模型检验了诊所患者人口统计学特征与需要接诊文书的几率之间的关联。对接诊资料包的长度、内容和阅读年级水平进行了检查。
在受邀诊所中,73%完成了调查。在参与调查的诊所中,55%在安排预约前要求提供接诊文书,34%仅提供英文表格,89%没有使用通俗易懂语言的表格。诊所患者的人口统计学特征与接诊文书要求无关。分析的接诊资料包(n = 67)平均有11页长,大多数的写作水平高于五年级。大多数资料包都要求提供医疗、发育和教育/治疗史。许多资料包还要求提供心理教育评估和教师评分表。报告的针对有语言或读写需求家庭的接诊支持策略包括对常规流程做出临时例外、将任务转移到外部组织、应家庭要求提供支持以及委托给支持人员。
全国许多自闭症诊所在进行诊断评估前要求提供接诊文书。许多诊所仅提供英文的接诊文书,而且文书往往不符合健康素养标准。减少文书要求并提供更常规和有力的接诊支持可能有助于公平获得自闭症诊断评估。