Drains in Abdominoplasties: The Less the Better?

BACKGROUND

Drains are traditionally inserted during surgery for reduction of fluid accumulation in the post-operative period. The appearance of drained fluids and their quantity can be early predictors of complications. Over the years, several studies have been conducted in attempt to determine the optimal number of drains that result in low rates of fluid accumulation with minimal impairment of quality of life.

PURPOSE

Determine the optimal number of suction drains in abdominoplasty procedures.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study, analyzing all abdominoplasty patients operated by a single surgeon. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on number of drains inserted at the end of the procedure. Rate of complications was compared between the groups and a multivariate logistic regression model was computed for the development of complications.

RESULTS

Seven-hundred and forty three patients were included in the analysis of this study. No drains were inserted in 355 patients (45%), whereas a single drain was inserted in 153 (20.6%) 2 drains in 255 patients (34.4%). Patients for whom a single drain was inserted intra-operatively, experienced at a statistically significant lower rate, surgical site infections (OR = 0.235), hypertrophic scars (OR = 0.326), wound dehiscence (OR = 0.272), as compared to patients with no drains. On the contrary, insertion of single drain was associated with a statistically significant higher risk for development of seroma (OR = 6.276) and the need for revision surgery (OR = 2.452).

CONCLUSION

Insertion of a single drain is associated with a lower risk of SSI and wound- dehiscence, but a greater risk for seroma development that requires surgical intervention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.